I run an icecast server which may grow into 10 000 listeners or more.
Are their any gotchas that I might need to patch change with sysctl?
I've changed kern.maxfiles and wondering if I could run out of TCP
sockets, or file descriptors, or something else I may have missed?
Aiming for high
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Thomas Frell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run an icecast server which may grow into 10 000 listeners or more.
Are their any gotchas that I might need to patch change with sysctl?
I've changed kern.maxfiles and wondering if I could run out of TCP
sockets, or
On 21/04/2008, at 1:53 PM, Matthew Weigel wrote:
David Gwynne wrote:
solaris suffers from this problem. you cant use big disks with
32bit solaris kernels.
For UFS, at least, but doesn't ZFS on i386 (not amd64) scale?
this is a block layer problem, nothing to do with the filesystems. if
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 22:53 -0500, Matthew Weigel wrote:
David Gwynne wrote:
solaris suffers from this problem. you cant use big disks with 32bit
solaris kernels.
For UFS, at least, but doesn't ZFS on i386 (not amd64) scale?
The filesystem yes, but the block addressing no. I had to split
Hello I use OpenBSD 4.2 with spamd ( all works ok !! )
But a have a question - can I use spamassasin with spamd
SzymonN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.0penbsd.pl
Visit http://www.inbox.com/email to find out more!
On 2008-04-21, Siegbert Marschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think there are some companies out there having collected a lot
more smart-data the we do, wonder what they do with it... ;)
in the case of Google, they wrote a paper, Failure Trends in a
Large Disk Drive Population (Pinheiro, Weber,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Matthieu Herrb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Amarendra Godbole
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am unable to move the display to a projector or an external monitor
on my Thinkpad X60, which is running OpenBSD 4.2-current. Fn-F7 is
Szymon Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello I use OpenBSD 4.2 with spamd ( all works ok !! )
But a have a question - can I use spamassasin with spamd
Yes.
Spamassassin also comes with a 'spamd' binary, but it installs in a
different location in the file system. The way things
In October 2007 I have established contact with QLogic, to investigate
whether they could help us in making iSCSI HBAs work in OpenBSD by
donating some hardware and by providing free programming documentation.
o;?Unfortunately, Qlogic has chosen to be difficult. This means, I am
forced to make
* Edwin Eyan Moragas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-19 07:34]:
been reading the select(2) man pages and it mentions poll(2)
being more efficient in most cases. this makes it obvious to
discard the use of select(2) in writing new servers.
yes. poll is the way better API, easier to use, easier
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:43:20AM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Edwin Eyan Moragas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the question is, which one is more useful when writing new servers?
kqueue or poll?
poll is more portable, while kqueue should be more performant (at
least, that's why it was
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:56:53PM -0400, Jan Schaumann wrote:
Hey,
So at work we ran into a situation where a process had to fdopen more
than 32K files, which lead to a file descriptor leak. The reason for
this leak was that while regular fds are ints, _file is a short, so if
fdopen got
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 03:35:13PM -0400, Chris Zakelj wrote:
Matthew Weigel wrote:
Chris Zakelj wrote:
... I'm wondering if thought is being given on how to make the physical
size (not filesystem... I totally understand why those should be kept
small) limitation of
Marc, Henning,
thank you for the insight.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:43:20AM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Edwin Eyan Moragas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the question is, which one is more useful when writing new
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:31:26PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
programming w/ libevent is convenient at times, the decision poll vs
libevent should not be made based on performance considerations,
exception beeing the above massive concurrent connection case.
I spent a lot of time doing
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 08:01:15PM +, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
I spent some time today testing Free/Open/NetBSD on the 2 PowerEdges which
turned up yesterday.
You can find the dmesgs here:
http://geeklan.co.uk/files/poweredge_t105/
a brief write up here:
http://www.geeklan.co.uk/?p=102
hello,
i can't build the ifconfig on landisk.
snapshot is from 2008/04/18 /usr/src is up to date.
see attached logfile.
best regards
thomas
cc -O2 -pipe-DINET6 -c ifconfig.c
ifconfig.c: In function `setifwmm':
ifconfig.c:1422: error: storage size of `wmm' isn't known
ifconfig.c:1426: error:
On 2008-04-21, Thomas Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 08:01:15PM +, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
I spent some time today testing Free/Open/NetBSD on the 2 PowerEdges which
turned up yesterday.
You can find the dmesgs here:
http://geeklan.co.uk/files/poweredge_t105/
a
Run make includes in /usr/src/include/ first.
Damien
| hello,
| i can't build the ifconfig on landisk.
| snapshot is from 2008/04/18 /usr/src is up to date.
|
| see attached logfile.
|
| best regards
| thomas
| cc -O2 -pipe-DINET6 -c ifconfig.c
| ifconfig.c: In function `setifwmm':
|
* Thomas Frell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-21 02:15:29]:
I run an icecast server which may grow into 10 000 listeners or more.
Are their any gotchas that I might need to patch change with sysctl?
I've changed kern.maxfiles and wondering if I could run out of TCP
sockets, or file descriptors,
Hi all,
I'm using 4.2 without problem, and I'm trying to find one xterm to my
personal use with only one thing in mind: low cpu and memory usage.
I discarded xterm because it have some things I don't need and it uses a
lot of memory too.
My two favourite options are aterm and rxvt. I have done
Hi folks,
For a variety of reasons and features, I'd like to install the
apache-httpd-2.2.4.tgz package. As a side note, I tried to install it
on OpenBSD 4.2, and there are a few package dependencies it apparently
is missing (at least on my box, which runs 4.2 without X) because the
install fails.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:19:18AM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
| Hi folks,
| For a variety of reasons and features, I'd like to install the
| apache-httpd-2.2.4.tgz package. As a side note, I tried to install it
| on OpenBSD 4.2, and there are a few package dependencies it apparently
| is missing (at
On Mon, Apr 21 2008 at 34:18, Jesus Sanchez wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
I'm using 4.2 without problem, and I'm trying to find one xterm to my
personal use with only one thing in mind: low cpu and memory usage.
I discarded xterm because it have some things I don't need and it uses a
lot of memory
Ed Flecko schrieb:
Hi folks,
For a variety of reasons and features, I'd like to install the
apache-httpd-2.2.4.tgz package. As a side note, I tried to install it
on OpenBSD 4.2, and there are a few package dependencies it apparently
is missing (at least on my box, which runs 4.2 without X)
Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
For a variety of reasons and features, I'd like to install the
apache-httpd-2.2.4.tgz package. As a side note, I tried to install it
on OpenBSD 4.2, and there are a few package dependencies it apparently
is missing (at least on my box, which runs 4.2 without X) because
Coincidentally, I have just received an update from QLogic in which
they emphasize their will to ship us the promised HBAs. Please pause
your efforts in sending emails to QLogic for now - it seems it already
has helped a lot.
I will update you as soon as I hear back from them, which should be end
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 09:43:43AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:31:26PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
programming w/ libevent is convenient at times, the decision poll vs
libevent should not be made based on performance considerations,
exception beeing the above
Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
For a variety of reasons and features, I'd like to install the
apache-httpd-2.2.4.tgz package. As a side note, I tried to install it
on OpenBSD 4.2, and there are a few package dependencies it apparently
is missing (at least on my box, which runs 4.2 without X) because
Jesus Sanchez wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using 4.2 without problem, and I'm trying to find one xterm to my
personal use with only one thing in mind: low cpu and memory usage.
I have been using mrxvt for years. It's also multi-tabbed. Currently,
I'm running 10 terminals in a single mrxvt process and
Has anyone had an opportunity to gauge Samba
performance on OpenBSD recently, either officially or
simply casual observations, I'd love to hear opinions.
I'm curious how it might compare to Samba on a modern
Linux machine on similar hardware.
Thanks in advance.
31 matches
Mail list logo
