Booting single processor generic is fine, bsd.mp panics on boot.
Jeff
(also filed with sendbug)
boot> bsd.mp
booting hd0a:bsd.mp: 6085700+1035580 [52+318368+300636]=0x761d24
entry point at 0x200120
[ using 619428 bytes of bsd ELF symbol table ]
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
I discovered that rules like
pass in on $int_if route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) from any to any
must route-to an interface and not that interface's ip address. The rule
set will load without an error message but the route-to rule will not
work if the ip address is specified.
My first question is
2008/7/21 Nuno MagalhC#es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm trying to scp from Debian to OpenBSD on two local machines but
> it's obviously not working. They're connected through a router and i
> can scp to another local Debian machine. Here's the output:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> scp -vr ~/folder/folder/
On 2008-07-21, William Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sorry for not mentioning it was a vmWare instance. The packet
> replay seemed to be the culprit.
>
> This occured when we moved the image to a vmWare host running vmWare ESX
> 3.5 from 3.0. Our working theory is that under 3.5 pernic
> These are both local machines, why would DNS be required?
Because in the modern world DNS -- or any other kind of reliable
name->address + address->name mapping -- is required.
You might as well get used to it.
>Your DNS is setup wrong.
Too vague.
>Try setting "UseDNS no" on the server in /etc/ssh/sshd_config.
That solved the slowness, thanks. I tried -HUP ing the sshd processes
but that didn't solve it at once (it only killed my connections fo
course); reboting the machine did, now it logs in fast. Is t
On 7/21/08, Jonathan Steel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is the line 'setenv BLOCKSIZE 1k' present in the .cshrc file? We
> noticed this because csh appears to be the default shell for our 3.5 and 3.6
> boxes and subsequently any functions that use sys/stat.h are messed up.
It's been like that
Hi
Why is the line 'setenv BLOCKSIZE 1k' present in the .cshrc file? We
noticed this because csh appears to be the default shell for our 3.5 and
3.6 boxes and subsequently any functions that use sys/stat.h are messed up.
Thanks
Jonathan Steel
Thank you guys for your quick responses :) This mailing list(group)
is awesome.
So last night, I changed my 4.3 openbsd gateway to 4.2 one, slapped on
the same pf rules BUT with user land pppoe and PRESTO it works like a
charm.
I could access my webserver in the lab totally fine.
I think
Nuno MagalhC#es escreveu:
> I'm trying to scp from Debian to OpenBSD on two local machines but
> it's obviously not working. They're connected through a router and i
> can scp to another local Debian machine. Here's the output:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> scp -vr ~/folder/folder/ 192.168.2.80:~
> Exec
I'm trying to scp from Debian to OpenBSD on two local machines but
it's obviously not working. They're connected through a router and i
can scp to another local Debian machine. Here's the output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> scp -vr ~/folder/folder/ 192.168.2.80:~
Executing: program /usr/bin/ssh host 192.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:51:10AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:28:57AM -0600, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> > Greetings:
> >
> > Sorry for not using sendbug, but I wanted to get something out quickly
> > while I have a moment.
> >
>
> it is always better to use sen
Hello everyone,
I am sorry for not mentioning it was a vmWare instance. The packet
replay seemed to be the culprit.
This occured when we moved the image to a vmWare host running vmWare ESX
3.5 from 3.0. Our working theory is that under 3.5 pernicious mode
works differently than under 3.0 a
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Joe Warren-Meeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The default limit for number of states is quite low. Try adding the
> following to pf.conf and running pfctl -vf /etc/pf.conf
> "
> set limit { states 5000, frags 5000, src-nodes 5000 }
> "
>
> You can up the values if
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:55:41PM +0200, Amaury De Ganseman wrote:
Hey there,
> I run OpenBSD 4.3 on my gateway. But when a machine behind the
> NAT/gateway uses bittoreent (or gtk-gnutella) I loss packets.
> For example when I try to do a ping www.google.com I can see "ping:
> sendto: No buffe
Daniel Melameth escreveu:
> Does the issue go away when you make ping part of the high priority queue?
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Amaury De Ganseman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I run OpenBSD 4.3 on my gateway. But when a machine behind the
>> NAT/gateway uses bittor
Does the issue go away when you make ping part of the high priority queue?
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Amaury De Ganseman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I run OpenBSD 4.3 on my gateway. But when a machine behind the
> NAT/gateway uses bittoreent (or gtk-gnutella) I loss packets.
> F
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:53:36PM -0700, my mail wrote:
| i have success build OpenBSD 4.3 ISO using floppy43.fs, and after
| testing, this iso work perfectly.
|
| but when i build OpenBSD 4.3 ISO using cd43.iso, my ISO can't boot,
| i have using options -no-emul-boot because this file to large.
my mail wrote:
> i have success build OpenBSD 4.3 ISO using floppy43.fs, and after testing,
> this iso work perfectly.
>
> but when i build OpenBSD 4.3 ISO using cd43.iso, my ISO can't boot, i have
> using options -no-emul-boot because this file to large.
>
> it's possibel to using cd43.iso whe
Hi all,
I run OpenBSD 4.3 on my gateway. But when a machine behind the
NAT/gateway uses bittoreent (or gtk-gnutella) I loss packets.
For example when I try to do a ping www.google.com I can see "ping:
sendto: No buffer space available" (on my gateway)
It's the same if I use gtk-gnutella. I think i
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:51:53 -0500
Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to present GPL version 10^100^100! (that's not an
> exclaimation, that's a factorial.)
>
> Over the years, clauses have been _removed_ from BSD-like licenses.
> The GPL keeps getting things _added_.
>
> *inser
> nice. btw, there is also a light http server called nostromo,
> developed by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's nhttpd, didn't you rtfm? The monkeys will eat you alive if you
didn't (beats masturbating the whole day).
--
Nuno MagalhC#es
* Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008-07-20, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Henning Brauer wrote:
> >> lighttpd.
> >
> > can it do reverse proxying, as needed for zope?
>
> it definitely can in 1.5, I'm not sure about the in-tree version
> but I think it's likely.
nice. btw, there i
On 2008-07-20, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Henning Brauer wrote:
>> lighttpd.
>
> can it do reverse proxying, as needed for zope?
it definitely can in 1.5, I'm not sure about the in-tree version
but I think it's likely.
hi,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:28:57AM -0600, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> Sorry for not using sendbug, but I wanted to get something out quickly
> while I have a moment.
>
it is always better to use sendbug because it helps us to remember and
to track the bug.
> Summary: I have a je
25 matches
Mail list logo
