Please advise how I can wake up my MCP55 on board network interface.
During installation of AMD64 OpenBSD 4.4 or i386 OpenBSD 4.3 the
network interface does not respond: "no link...sleeping".
The ethernet card is on board NVIDIA MCP55.
After reboot, I tried to manually configure the card, but I
Thanks to LEVAI Daniel for providing his dmesg. To add mere confirmation, I
too was able to boot 4.4 release with NIC interface active/recognized after
'boot -c' + 'disable acpi', however I was unable to muster the skill to
accomplish the ftp transfer. Is Daniel's dmesg sufficient for debug, o
Just to put everything in visual perspective:
Hi,
I have STATIC dsl - with 5 static ips. I don't use the Netopia router
that came with it, instead used OpenBSD as the router/firewall. So
for this I setup openbsd on a box with pppoe and pf. The setup works
totally fine. People can reach
Hi,
I have STATIC dsl - with 5 static ips. I don't use the Netopia router
that came with it, instead used OpenBSD as the router/firewall. So
for this I setup openbsd on a box with pppoe and pf. The setup works
totally fine. People can reach my webservers fine which are BEHIND my
openb
On Nov 8, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Alfredo Perez wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 04:00:23PM -0800, johan beisser wrote:
On Nov 8, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Alfredo Perez wrote:
Hi
I have the following configuration
router/firewall <--- OPENBSD BOX <- Wireless switch
I'm confused. Why isn't the O
On Nov 8, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Alfredo Perez wrote:
Hi
I have the following configuration
router/firewall <--- OPENBSD BOX <- Wireless switch
I'm confused. Why isn't the OpenBSD box the router/firewall?
nat.conf shows
nat on rl0 from dc0/24 to any -> rl0
nat.conf? Do you mean pf.con
Hi
I have the following configuration
router/firewall <--- OPENBSD BOX <- Wireless switch
Openbsd box has two NICs
rl0 connects OPENBSD BOX to router/firewall
dc0 connects Wireless swith to OPENBSD BOX
nat.conf shows
nat on rl0 from dc0/24 to any -> rl0
sysctl.conf shows:
net.inet.ip
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Chris Miller wrote:
And then maybe I'm completely mis-understanding how to run multiple
internal ssl servers on one external IP address and that it can't be
done without more external IPs from Qwest.
I think this can be done with a proxy server that decrypts the SSL connect
Rod Whitworth wrote:
...
> Let's look at this a little more analytically:
> My firewall is a Soekris 4801 with sis0, sis1 and sis2.
> sis0 is the 0utside (ADSL)
> sis1 is the 1nside (LAN)
> sis2 is the 2erver LAN
heh. I gotta remember that naming/numbering convention, I like it!
> If 0 fails the
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
"Denis Doroshenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
what keeps you from writing a script that would be called
from the end of /etc/netstart; the script would check whether the
initialized network interfaces match those described by a
predefined table? in case of failure i
--- On Sat, 11/8/08, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?
> To: "Francisco Valladolid Hdez." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Saturday, November 8, 2008, 8:17 AM
> * Francisco Vallad
"Denis Doroshenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what keeps you from writing a script that would be called
> from the end of /etc/netstart; the script would check whether the
> initialized network interfaces match those described by a
> predefined table? in case of failure it would react somehow..
On Thursday 06 November 2008 22.24.49 Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Jamie Cuesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I was hoping to include a dmesg via serial port capture (my box
> > does not include a floppy), but
>
> Use ftp.
On Friday 07 November 2008 17.24.52 Ted Unangst
Hi, using stable 4.3.
Does the cdrecord port supports DVD? I have a few
problems with pipelines and growisofs and cdrecord
seems to allow them well.
thanks for all
-Jesus.
Hi!
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 09:17:53AM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
>Keep in mind that the Webserver in base has seen a lot of security and other
>improvements like chroot() by default etc. It is not a stock 1.3 Apache,
>it is only based on Apache 1.3.
>Apache 2 in ports was only imported to make i
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the bad configuration the NIC with 00:30:48:d2:9a:06 is
> called "em2", in the good one it is called "em4". Maybe you
> can imagine how PF screws up, if this NIC would have been
> physically connected to the Internet.
>
And then maybe I'm completely mis-understanding how to run multiple
internal ssl servers on one external IP address and that it can't be
done without more external IPs from Qwest.
I think this can be done with a proxy server that decrypts the SSL
connection then passes it on to the web server.
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, johan beisser wrote:
>On Nov 7, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Dave Anderson wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps most of these issues could be dealt with by changing the
>> network
>> configuration procedure to have a hierarchy of interface-configuration
>> files rather than just hostname.. If hostname.
Hi all,
I've got a problem with my web server and ssl that I'm having a hard
time figuring out. This might take a while to explain so bail now or
bear with me ;-)
I'm on Qwest DSL with one static IP. The dsl modem is set to port
forward all ports (putting the web server in the modem's DMZ is a
Theo de Raadt ha scritto:
You're right Theo, but isn't better an answer like: RTFC ? Just 4 char.
There is no point in telling people who can't read the code, to go
read the code. It won't change a thing. They really will keep coming
back to misc showing their false expectations.
I t
> I think the mailing lists would be better if it wasn't always full of
> people asking stupid questions, and then being answered by people with
> ridiculous or uneducated answers.
> Not that I want to be here providing the correct answers. Why bother?
> They won't be understood, and it isn't wor
thanks for the reply. i guess i'll go for a pci card with a silicon
image chip then
On Nov 7, 2008, at 22:48, Anathae Townsend wrote:
I have had varied success with this card under openbsd. It would
nearly
always cause a hang with a timeout error to the primary console when
installed on an
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:09:08PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > You're right Theo, but isn't better an answer like: RTFC ? Just 4 char.
>
> There is no point in telling people who can't read the code, to go
> read the code. It won't change a thing. They really will keep coming
> back to misc
Francisco Valladolid Hdez. ha scritto:
Hi folks.
I need a recomendation for using one or other web server for a shared web
hosting for a small company.
Always prefer using Apache from base, whenever I watch that Apache 2 include
best performance compared to 1.3 (included in base), and best re
Boris Goldberg wrote:
Hello Alexander,
Thursday, November 6, 2008, 7:44:16 AM, you wrote:
AH> OpenBSD 4.4-current (RAMDISK_CD) #203: Sun Nov 2 13:41:35 MST 2008
AH> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/RAMDISK_CD
You might want to try i386.
Good idea. Of course I'd prefer
* Francisco Valladolid Hdez. wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I need a recomendation for using one or other web server for a shared web
> hosting for a small company.
>
> Always prefer using Apache from base, whenever I watch that Apache 2 include
> best performance compared to 1.3 (included in base), an
On Saturday 08 November 2008 08:40:55 Francisco Valladolid Hdez. wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I need a recomendation for using one or other web server for a shared
> web hosting for a small company.
>
> Always prefer using Apache from base, whenever I watch that Apache 2
> include best performance compar
27 matches
Mail list logo
