Hi Uwe,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 01:54:06PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Ryan Flannery wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
>>
>>> Recently, I noticed an ssh user on one of my machines, who never logged on,
>>> is not visible with 'last', seems to have no terminal active, a
Ryan Flannery wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
Recently, I noticed an ssh user on one of my machines, who never logged on,
is not visible with 'last', seems to have no terminal active, and is back
immediately after a reboot.
Hmm.
root 13415 0.0 0.9 3280 2420 ?
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Recently, I noticed an ssh user on one of my machines, who never logged on,
> is not visible with 'last', seems to have no terminal active, and is back
> immediately after a reboot.
> Hmm.
> root 13415 0.0 0.9 3280 2420 ?? Ss12:04PM
Recently, I noticed an ssh user on one of my machines, who never logged
on, is not visible with 'last', seems to have no terminal active, and is
back immediately after a reboot.
Hmm.
root 13415 0.0 0.9 3280 2420 ?? Ss12:04PM0:00.08 sshd:
isuser
isuser 702 0.0 0.7 3280 18
Hi there all
I'm expecting this to be in a manpage somewhere but I cant find it
(Google-foo not being good it seems today) so please bear with be if I'm
being a bit daft here.
What I've setup is a PPPoE concentrator (OpenBSD/i386 4.5-GENERIC as a host
OS) with a FreeRADIUS+MySQL backend and for s
En caso de no poder ver correctamente este correo favor de dar haga clic aqum
Vigencia del 14 de agosto al 20 de diciembre 2009
No aplica en puentes
Este mensaje fue enviado para informacisn de nuestras promociones. No
pretendemos saturar su correo ni causarle molestias. Este mensaje de correo
e
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
La Sociedad Rural Argentina y la Universidad Catslica de La Plata,
lo invitan a participar del curso a distancia:
Produccisn de Porcinos
Profesor Titular:
Sr. Eugenio Bobes
Cuales son los beneficios de este curso:
Este curso introduce en el negocio de la crma de cer
On Aug 10, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
I have a couple of questions regarding setting up ipsec.
I've read the "4 minutes" page and modified the older setup to work
with 2 OpenBSD 4.5 boxes. That's enough to get me going with an
IPsec tunnel by IP addresses but one side
I use this one
http://www.lacie.com/es/products/product.htm?pid=10802
on a daily basis, encrypted. It behaves as it's supposed to.
2009/8/20 Marcos Laufer :
> I've installed two of these on a MacOS X the day before i posted my
> message and i liked
> them a lot. I'd love to use them with my Open
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:50:59AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I am sure you misunderstood me.
No, I understand quite clearly that ZCR is a pile of marketing drivel.
At this point in my life, I apply that same belief to any "RAID"
technology that ships standard on a motherboard. There might
Thanks Romain and Olivier (and Vijay),
Romain Bertrand wrote:
> Check the Virtual option of xorg.conf (in subsection Display)
Olivier Mehani wrote:
> Maybe add the following to your xorg.conf, and have a quick read of [0]
> for more details.
> ...
> [0] http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Xorg_RandR_1.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:49:10PM +0300, Lars Noodin wrote:
> $ xrandr --output VGA --left-of LVDS
> xrandr: screen cannot be larger than 1680x1680 (desired size 2320x1050)
> $ xrandr --output VGA --right-of LVDS
> xrandr: screen cannot be larger than 1680x1680 (desired size 2320x1050)
> How d
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-08-19, Jeff Ross wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
ZCR is marketing fluff. It ads nothing.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:42:10PM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
Hi,
I'm due to take delivery tomorrow of a new-to-me SuperMicro 2U server
with the X5DPA-8GG motherboard. Onbo
I recently tried to upgrade several of my OpenBSD machines to 4.5 (X86). I
also upgraded the Amanda clients on them to 2.6.1, which I have working on
FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris 5, Solaris 8, and HP-UX.
Despite my best efforts, I have yet to get the OpenBSD 4.5 clients to back
up correctly. All the c
Thursday 20 Aug 2009 17:49:10 (+0300), Lars Noodin wrote :
> How do I circumvent the screen size limitation?
Check the Virtual option of xorg.conf (in subsection Display)
I'm running current on i386. X or xrandr doesn't seem to enjoy attempts
at dual head with the relative placement side-by-side:
$ xrandr --output VGA --left-of LVDS
xrandr: screen cannot be larger than 1680x1680 (desired size 2320x1050)
$ xrandr --output VGA --right-of LVDS
xrandr: screen cann
I am sure you misunderstood me.
LSI RAID and SCSI/SAS cards are great. The best in the industry. In
fact I run virtually all my machines on some variation of those cards.
I even revamped ami(4) last christmas. At the same time I added bio(4)
support for mpi(4) cards.
I can't comment on ARC but
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 06:01:57PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> ZCR is marketing fluff. It ads nothing.
The same could be said for most LSI megaRAID products.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=mfi&sektion=4&arch=i386&apropos=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current
seems to be an exception, but I
I've installed two of these on a MacOS X the day before i posted my
message and i liked
them a lot. I'd love to use them with my OpenBSD server farm
Brian A. Seklecki escribis:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 13:53 -0300, Marcos Laufer wrote:
>
>> Hello, has anyone had any experience with LaCie Raid
Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Lars Nooden wrote:
>> If $random_http_site is acceptable despite the weaker protocol and no
>> one is set on a specific domain name, then hosting accounts are
>> available at the Internet Archive:
>>http://www.archive.org/create/
>>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 8/20/09, Igor Sobrado wrote:
>> we have a few problems here too (using TeX Live in both OpenBSD 4.6
>> and -current, on i386 and amd64); i would suggest sending a detailed
>> bug report to the TeX Live developers at this mailing list:
>
> O
On 2009-08-19, Jeff Ross wrote:
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
>> ZCR is marketing fluff. It ads nothing.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:42:10PM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm due to take delivery tomorrow of a new-to-me SuperMicro 2U server
>>> with the X5DPA-8GG motherboard. Onboard
On 8/20/09, Igor Sobrado wrote:
>> Thoughts? (Sorry if this is such a sketchy report, but I'm pressed for
>> time right now!)
>
> we have a few problems here too (using TeX Live in both OpenBSD 4.6
> and -current, on i386 and amd64); i would suggest sending a detailed
> bug report to the TeX Live
Woodchuck wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > You do not say which version of OpenBSD you are running. I
> > tried your example on current (amd64 and i386) and 4.5 (amd64)
> > and did get the proper results.
>
> 4.2 I've been too cowardly to upgrade.
It's not that h
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:54:26AM -0400, Woodchuck wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > You do not say which version of OpenBSD you are running. I tried your
> > example on current (amd64 and i386) and 4.5 (amd64) and did get the
> > proper results.
> >
> >
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:10:35AM -0400, Woodchuck wrote:
> Sorry for cowering behind a pseudonymous email address, (...)
> Perhaps this is cowardly in certain nations more closely associated
> with their former or present colonial Masters than my own (...)
Please keep politics off this list and
Woodchuck wrote:
>> You do not say which version of OpenBSD you are running. I tried your
>> example on current (amd64 and i386) and 4.5 (amd64) and did get the
>> proper results.
>>
> 4.2 I've been too cowardly to upgrade. I'd have thought that "sort"
> might have been frozen in amber a few deca
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> You do not say which version of OpenBSD you are running. I tried your
> example on current (amd64 and i386) and 4.5 (amd64) and did get the
> proper results.
>
>-Otto
4.2 I've been too cowardly to upgrade. I'd have thought that "so
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:51:25 +0200
merlyn wrote:
> On Monday 17 August 2009 00:51:28 stan wrote:
> > I realize that there is histroy here but I really need to make this
> > tool work, and OpenBSD is my OS of choice for network related
> > functions.
> >
> > Has anyone gotten wireshark to compile
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:10:35AM -0400, Woodchuck wrote:
> I have transposed the output to rows for ease of study. For these
> examples, ascii collating order and numeric collating order are by
> coincidence the same.
>
> cat testfile
> 16.88 16.54 15.12 15.00 14.57
>
> sort testfile
> 14.57
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
>
> I bulled ahead and installed the 2008 texlive from TUG, but still
> errors. Say I do:
[...]
> Thoughts? (Sorry if this is such a sketchy report, but I'm pressed for
> time right now!)
we have a few problems here too (using TeX Live in both
Sorry for cowering behind a pseudonymous email address,
but I have the same given names as certain famous people in
professions related to mine and wish to avoid confusion. Moreover
such fame and identity as I have is tied to the delightful creature,
the woodchuck, after which I am pseudonamed.
P
According to pf.conf:
If no-df is given, fragments with the dont-fragment bit set have
it cleared before entering the fragment cache, and thus the
reassembled packet doesn't have dont-fragment set either.
But from reading the code, and from experimentation, this seems
backwards: dont-
33 matches
Mail list logo
