ok. count me in for $100.
happy birthday Theo!
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I know Theo wants this:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/Arcteryx-Naos-55-backpack-size-tall-Arcteryx-/300559016308?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item45fab6a174
>
> I am bidding on it so contact me off lis
I know Theo wants this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Arcteryx-Naos-55-backpack-size-tall-Arcteryx-/300559016308?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item45fab6a174
I am bidding on it so contact me off list if you want to contribute.
Remember hiking == code.
On Sat, 21 May 2011, Paul M wrote:
>On 20/05/2011, at 12:27 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
>> FWIW I've encountered several ASUS notebooks which panic during boot
>> (in aml_parse or parse_aml, I can't remember which is correct); since
>
>aml_xparse
>
>> these are store demo machines I don't have any
Gentilissimo Cliente
Abbiamo il piacere di farLe presente che il nostro sistema informatico
ha scelto la sua posizione per un regalo unico nel suo genere, legga
cliccando nell'allegato le istruizioni per ricevere il suo regalo!
Gentilissimo Cliente
Abbiamo il piacere di farLe presente che il nostro sistema informatico
ha scelto la sua posizione per un regalo unico nel suo genere, legga
cliccando nell'allegato le istruizioni per ricevere il suo regalo!
On 20/05/2011, at 12:27 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
FWIW I've encountered several ASUS notebooks which panic during boot
(in aml_parse or parse_aml, I can't remember which is correct); since
aml_xparse
these are store demo machines I don't have any good way to capture the
detailed information (
On 05/20/2011 05:26 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
Better tha
iptables?
http://www.esecurityplanet.com/news/article.php/3934151/Fedora-15-Boosts
-Linux-Security.htm
maybe...
But apps opening pinholes?
Oh dear.
Those of us running pf for years know that being able to do rule
changes on the fly is a G
Nope. Was changing a iptable rule on the fly on a ubuntu server at
work yesterday. This is nothing new. The new shit is allowing programs
to talk to the firewall. This may or may not be a good thing depend on
how much control over which program may talk to it and what it can
change. I certainly won
>> Better tha
>> iptables?
>> http://www.esecurityplanet.com/news/article.php/3934151/Fedora-15-Boosts
>> -Linux-Security.htm
>> maybe...
>>
>> But apps opening pinholes?
>
> That's just asking for trouble!
You fuddy duddy guys don't know anything. Did you check wikipedia, the
authoritative sourc
On Fri, 20 May 2011 17:49:22 -0500, John Jackson wrote:
>On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 08:26:50AM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>> Better tha
>> iptables?
>> http://www.esecurityplanet.com/news/article.php/3934151/Fedora-15-Boosts
>> -Linux-Security.htm
>> maybe...
>>
>> But apps opening pinholes?
>
>Tha
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 08:26:50AM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> Better tha
> iptables?
> http://www.esecurityplanet.com/news/article.php/3934151/Fedora-15-Boosts
> -Linux-Security.htm
> maybe...
Imagine the dynamic firewall technology in the cloud!
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 08:26:50AM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> Better tha
> iptables?
> http://www.esecurityplanet.com/news/article.php/3934151/Fedora-15-Boosts
> -Linux-Security.htm
> maybe...
>
> But apps opening pinholes?
That's just asking for trouble!
>
> Oh dear.
>
> Those of us runnin
Better tha
iptables?
http://www.esecurityplanet.com/news/article.php/3934151/Fedora-15-Boosts
-Linux-Security.htm
maybe...
But apps opening pinholes?
Oh dear.
Those of us running pf for years know that being able to do rule
changes on the fly is a Good Thing(tm).
And I think that we'd all laugh
On 20 May 2011 09:37, Leonardo Lombardo wrote:
> I see... I have to define a separate queue for each IP. But as far as i know
> I'd have to recompile the kernel in order to have as much queues as I need
> (more than 200).
>
> Don't you think I'd be nice to have something that helps in defining suc
Hi,
we're struggling with that for quite a while, and I didn't find any hints in
4.8 or 4.9 about it being fixed.
The setup (simplified, there's also another firewall with pfsync, but that
does not matter):
One firewall with three interfaces. em0 is the local interface with an IP,
em1 an interfac
Yes,
it would be interesting to hear some devs on this topic.
A specially about drivers "on board":
1. What can be done and what is missing.
2. What hw is worth to spend money on and what kind of hw devs need to make it
worth to spend money on.
I'd like to see this kind on acceleration perform b
o;?
Lease/Monetize Bank
Instrument
We can arrange an
instrument in your name/company name from Major Banks and Institutions
which
include: Barclays, HSBC, Bank of America and others (Top 25) with a time
period
available from 1 to 5 years.
B7
SBLC/BG/MTN in U.S.D. or
Euros
B7
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Gary Thornock wrote:
> My previous company has a pair of firewalls running OpenBSD 4.4 with
> CARP. They've been running with no problem since just after the 4.4
> release, until the last couple of days.
>
> Now, the firewall that should be in BACKUP state has som
Sorry for the subject, but there's no Internet in the 2 connection. It is
IP VPN, to connect 2 sites.
But i have 2 connections RouterB1 and RouterB2 connected to router A.
I want to accumulate the 2 x 1M with OpenBSD,(if it is possible) and so
have A big Connection 2M.
(B)---LANOpenBSD(rou
Invitacisn a Curso Experto en Google y Posicionamiento Web, Curso con
sede en:
Cursos de Posicionamiento en Google.
11 de Mayo en Santiago de Chile.
13 de Mayo en Temuco Chile.
21 de Mayo en Monterrey
02 de Junio en Canczn
7 de Junio Online en la comodidad de su casa u Oficina.
10 de Junio en Mixic
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Ariane van der Steldt
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For development on OpenBSD, I need a sun v120 machine in Eindhoven,
> > the Netherlands.
> > It turns out, I don't have a 64-bit big-endian machine (and suns are
> > just awesome).
> >
> > Please contact me if you h
Hi,
I have a client who have 2 locations : A, B
On side A : he has a RDS Server (TSE), with a router provided by ISP
(there's no internet, it's a 2M connection)
On side B : he has 2 IP VPN Connection to Side A (2 x routers, there's no
internet, but the link is 1M, so 2 x 1M). Users in B works
Hello,
We had the same problem a few weeks ago, where one interface on the
backup machine decides to become master.
This will create an ARP conflict as both machines will respond to the
ARP request, and that will make it very slow.
The first thing to check is wether the two interfaces see eac
I see... I have to define a separate queue for each IP. But as far as i know I'd have to recompile the kernel in order to have as much queues as I need (more
than 200).
Don't you think I'd be nice to have something that helps in defining such
things ? Maybe I'm approaching this problem the wron
Psicolibro Ediciones y la
Escuela Sistimica Argentina
Invitan a la presentacisn del libro
TODOS FRACASOS
Experiencias Terapiuticas. Para Psicslogos,
Pacientes e impacientes.
De HORACIO SEREBRINSKY
COLECCISN CUENTOS
Martes 24 de Mayo a las 19.30 hs.
en Dolce Vita
Nicaragua 4849 Ciudad
25 matches
Mail list logo
