On Thu, May 26 2011 at 48:23, Oeschger Patrick wrote:
hi all
obsd 4.9 seems to support 128 routing domains
is this a hard limit or is it configurable?
how about 512/1024/2048 routing domains? (silly idea?)
...i want to consolidate more than 128 small firewalls on one hardware and
routing
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 09:18:48AM +0200, Claer wrote:
On Thu, May 26 2011 at 48:23, Oeschger Patrick wrote:
hi all
obsd 4.9 seems to support 128 routing domains
is this a hard limit or is it configurable?
how about 512/1024/2048 routing domains? (silly idea?)
...i want to consolidate
Hola misc, si no podes visualizar este correo, podes hacerlo clickeando
en este enlace.
MASTER SECURITY Y TECNICOS EN PC 2011
Un Pack en DVDs con las ultimas novedades en programas para
Hacking Seguridad de Sistemas y Tecnicos en PC. Envio SIN CARGO a todo el
Pais !!!
Los mismos no tienen
Hi,
For some months now, I have exactly the same problem than:
http://marc.info/?t=12985968427r=1w=2
and I carefully read the post of Philip.
I have a local repo (synced through cvsync) and it seems that updating
sources with a local repo triggers a problem.
I checked out
Si no puede ver esta informacisn haga click aqum
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Junio
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Viernes
03
Jun.2011
[IMAGE]
DICTAMEN LOCAL 2010 PARA EL DF INCLUYE REFORMAS 2011 AL CSDIGO FISCAL DF
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
C.P.C. Vicente Velazquez Melindez
Inicio: 09
I tried to build a sol console connection on Dell PE T310/OpenBSD 4.8/
iDRAC6 embedded BMC using ipmitool (downloaded from ports' webpage).
Enabling IPMI in kernel (using config) gives an access to sensors, but
I cannot establish any
remote sol console connection to this machine even from
Re: Firewall PF WITH NETWORK ALIAS
Sorry, but PF does not run well on openbsd? then do not understand why I have
to go alone to the freebsd lists.
you understand when someone needs help with a problem and need some idea for
solution?
I am sorry to have bothered anyone, but my only intention was
Hi,
I'm trying to forward multicast traffic through my firewalls using PIM-SM.
Are there any alternatives to XORP?
Is multicast_router=YES enough in rc.conf.local?
regards,
Giannis
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which
had a name of smime.p7s]
Hi,
Is there a way to tell ldapd(8) to write it's PID in /var/run ?
TIA,
Jo
MArtin Grados Marquina themartin...@yahoo.es writes:
Sorry, but PF does not run well on openbsd? then do not understand why I have
to go alone to the freebsd lists.
There are significant differences between the PF in FreeBSD (equivalent
to OpenBSD 4.1, roughly) and recent OpenBSD versions,
Hi,
On Fri, 27 May 2011 19:53:15 +0700, Kapetanakis Giannis
bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to forward multicast traffic through my firewalls using
PIM-SM.
Only DVMRP
Are there any alternatives to XORP?
Yes. dvmrpd (8).
Is multicast_router=YES enough in
27 maj 2011 kl. 14.55 skrev Joel Carnat:
Hi,
Is there a way to tell ldapd(8) to write it's PID in /var/run ?
No. You can use 'pgrep ldapd' instead.
.martin
TIA,
Jo
On 2011-05-27, Marek Czubenko marek.czube...@umk.pl wrote:
Under FreeBSD i set the asf flag, installed ipmitool and it worked.
Under OpenBSD i enabled ipmi, installed ipmitool and it didnn't work.
Shared NIC or dedicated? OpenBSD doesn't support IPMI with shared NIC.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 03:53:15PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to forward multicast traffic through my firewalls using PIM-SM.
Are there any alternatives to XORP?
Is multicast_router=YES enough in rc.conf.local?
regards,
Giannis
[demime 1.01d removed an
*hmmm*
i did a test using ipsec vpn colouring aka. tagging
ipsec.conf offers the option to tag the vpn traffic for further PF filtering
using these tags i can instruct PF to use different public NAT addresses
(outgoing to internet) for each VPN
but when you have overlapping subnets behind the VPNs
On 05/27/2011 08:55 AM, Joel Carnat wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to tell ldapd(8) to write it's PID in /var/run ?
why?
OpenBSD isn't too fond of PID files...
Nick.
On Fri, May 27 2011 at 07:16, Oeschger Patrick wrote:
*hmmm*
*hmmm*,
i did a test using ipsec vpn colouring aka. tagging
ipsec.conf offers the option to tag the vpn traffic for further PF filtering
using these tags i can instruct PF to use different public NAT addresses
(outgoing to
I just realized I am having exactly the same problem described in this
thread:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=127601909229979w=2
In my case, I also see an error:
mtrr set failled: invalid argument
According to the thread, this was solved in current. Previous versions
of current worked fine
Is there a way bgpctl will produce run-time information not using
asdot format? I am trying to convert my OpenBGP conf to RPSL but the
later is old enough that wont accept as-dot format, therefore I need
it in 4-byte ASN notation.
Thanks.
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal:
I was able to lab it up and confirm and recreate the bug. I realize
that this subject has been beaten to death now but I wanted to chime
in saying:
* Yes, it's definitely fixed in -current. This isn't new information
but good info for my organization.
* There's a simple way to reliable reproduce
I just realized I am having exactly the same problem described in this
thread:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=127601909229979w=2
In my case, I also see an error:
mtrr set failled: invalid argument
I also see it daily on amd64 but there is no problem with X for me.
IMHO that's not
On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer dudu.me...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way bgpctl will produce run-time information not using
asdot format?
Not at present, OpenBGP only accepts as-plain for input, it always
outputs as-dot.
I think we should probably change this, rfc5396 came out a couple
of years
Hi Amit,
Thanks for the response.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
I just realized I am having exactly the same problem described in this
thread:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=127601909229979w=2
In my case, I also see an error:
mtrr set
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer dudu.me...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way bgpctl will produce run-time information not using
asdot format?
Not at present, OpenBGP only accepts as-plain for input, it always
outputs
On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer dudu.me...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer dudu.me...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way bgpctl will produce run-time information not using
asdot format?
Not at present,
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 08:54:25PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer dudu.me...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer dudu.me...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way bgpctl will
Hello all:
Purely for curiosity, is is possible to enable mpls on the tun(4) interface?
Thanks,
Matt
Hello list:
Purely for curiosity, is it possible to enable mpls on a tun(4) interface?
Thanks,
Matt
On 05/27/11 14:53, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to supply a command to screen. Unfortunatly when using putty
or ssh nothing seems to happen:
screen? screen? I dimly recall a program called screen. Archaic piece
of sh**, as I recall.
[helmut@OBSDHelmut ~]$ screen ls -la
[screen
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:27:59PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
On 05/27/11 14:53, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to supply a command to screen. Unfortunatly when using putty
or ssh nothing seems to happen:
screen? screen? I dimly recall a program called screen. Archaic piece
Just saying that at least, screen has been working for decades
properly. Even if it was archaic. But it's not like tty are anything
new themselves (the 8bit version ones).
Go read the source code some time.
bye bye.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Hugo Villeneuve
harpa...@jwales.eintr.net wrote:
Has tmux been fixed to work on 150 MHz computers since it has
moved to libevent?
Has anyone reported what doesn't work?
32 matches
Mail list logo