Invitación para Recursos Humanos y Supervisores

290205 [IMAGE] Pms de Mixico prestigiada firma de capacitacisn a nivel nacional trae para usted dos exclusivos eventos. Taller de Formacisn para Supervisores Altamente Productivos y Motivacionales 14 de Noviembre, Cd. de Mixico. Hoy mas que nunca, se requiere en las empresas hombres pensantes

Re: shift+backspace in X

On 02/11/11 02:09 -0200, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: >On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 05:12:47PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> In X, shift + backspace used to work the same as backspace on its own >> (i.e. delete the previous character), but no longer does so in recent >> -current, most likely follo

Re: shift+backspace in X

On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 05:12:47PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > In X, shift + backspace used to work the same as backspace on its own > (i.e. delete the previous character), but no longer does so in recent > -current, most likely following the xkb update. > > Does anyone know how to restore th

Re: OpenBSD 5.0 released Nov 1, 2011

Hi, Thanks a lot for you and all the developers. On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Nov 1, 2011. > > We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.0. > This is our 30th release on CD

Re: OpenBSD 5.0 released Nov 1, 2011

Congrats and thanks to you and the entire OpenBSD team!

Re: traffic shaping in OpenBSD

ZZ Wave writes: > What solution should be used for traffic shaping on real-life, "production" > gateways with tens and hundreds users? PF queues seem to be too > "userspace"-ish and CPU consuming. PF setups with various altq disciplines are serving sites with larger user bases than that. If i

Re: traffic shaping in OpenBSD

ZZ Wave writes: > For example, in FreeBSD there is "slow" pf in userspace and "fast" > kernel-level netgraph. Wow, I can scarcely imagine a single sentence that reveals more thoroughly and conclusively how little familiarity you have with any of the systems you mention. Hint: both pf and netgra

shift+backspace in X

In X, shift + backspace used to work the same as backspace on its own (i.e. delete the previous character), but no longer does so in recent -current, most likely following the xkb update. Does anyone know how to restore the previous behaviour? I don't have any keyboard-related sections in xorg.co

Re: OpenBSD 5.0 released Nov 1, 2011

Great news =) This is awesome! Good work // Johan

Re: OpenBSD 5.0 released Nov 1, 2011

Awesome! Thanks for what is sure to be another great release. Is this officially the first release that didn't have a patch issued? http://www.openbsd.org/errata49.html I've only been paying attention since about 2.6, and don't recall a clean track record like this. If so, that's an amazing fea

Re: OpenBSD 5.0 released Nov 1, 2011

Thanks! and Yeah! On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Nov 1, 2011. > > We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.0. > This is our 30th release on CD-ROM (and 31th via FTP). We remai

Re: OpenBSD 5.0 released Nov 1, 2011

Yeah!! El 01-11-2011, a las 11:38, Theo de Raadt escribiC3: > > Nov 1, 2011. > > We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.0. > This is our 30th release on CD-ROM (and 31th via FTP). We remain > proud of

OpenBSD 5.0 released Nov 1, 2011

Nov 1, 2011. We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.0. This is our 30th release on CD-ROM (and 31th via FTP). We remain proud of OpenBSD's record of more than ten years with only two remote holes in the

Re: HP ProLiant DL360 G4p

On 31.10.2011. 19:04, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011-10-31, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: hello everyone, everything is working fine, but after bios update i see some acpi log in dmesg acpicpu0 at acpi0acpi0: unable to load \\_PR_.CPU0._PDC.IST0 acpicpu1 at acpi0### AML PARSE ERROR (0x3cb): Undefi

Re: herbstluftwm

Also, forgot that default autostart file needs some adjustments in order to work in other shells (it is a bash script). I just removed brackets in function names and commented tag stuff to work with ksh.

herbstluftwm

I find it extremely good and it has just replaced ratpoison as my WM. Maybe it will be a good match for someone else too (it is virtually unknown). Here's a patch for it to compile on OpenBSD (you'll need `gmake` and `asciidoc`): diff --git a/Ma

Re: Pointers on starting X, then run browser and when it quits, automatically shutdown the computer X

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 01:29:58PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Sime Ramov [2011-10-29 13:58]: > > * Tito Mari Francis Escaqo > > [2011-10-29T17:50+0800]: > > > My idea is for the whole system to run off a Live CD, but I'm quite > > > lost how to start the X windowing system, then the web br

Re: bootstrap.pl

* Ingo Schwarze [2011-11-01 14:12+0100]: > You are reinventing parts of site50.tgz, install.site, and > rc.firsttime(8), but in a way that requires more manual labour. Yep, you are right, forgot about those, thanks! > Parts seem to be missing here to edit mailer.conf(5) and > rc.conf.local(8) to

Re: bootstrap.pl

Hi Sime, Sime Ramov wrote on Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:45:29PM +0100: > I've got tired of setting up my system after clean installs of -current > so I wrote this simple script which I pipe to perl immediately after > first boot. You want to look at http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#site You

Undelivered mail

--> Error description: Error-For: alban...@listserv.buffalo.edu Error-Code: 5.1.1 Error-Text: No such list. Error-End: One error reported. Reporting-MTA: dns; LISTSERV.BUFFALO.EDU Final-Recipient: RFC822; alban...@listserv.buffalo.edu Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 (No such list)

Re: traffic shaping in OpenBSD

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 08:53:46 +0100 > "Bret S. Lambert" wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 09:47:35AM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote: >> > On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:17:56 +0400 >> > ZZ Wave wrote: >> > >> > > What solution should be used for tr

Re: OpenBSD and shebang line to a script not supported?

Hmm, I guess all those ports that are ported over from Linux sources, well that must be false information. Those damn liars. And when they talk about how FreeBSD and NetBSD does source/drivers a workable way, and maybe we should try to adapt to OpenBSD, Hmm, another lie! I am so glad you cleare

Re: OpenBSD and shebang line to a script not supported?

The underlying question, not asked here, is "why do you want to do this" ? It's a few more lines of code to take the first wrapper script and pass the arguments to another intepriter script, much like this: #!/bin/sh second-perl-script $@ There might be some command line argument handling

Re: KDE 4 on OpenBSD

Stupid gmail. The correct link is: https://groups.google.com/group/openbsd-kde/attach/39c330dd15c777e5/snapshot1.png?part=2&authuser=0&view=1

Re: KDE 4 on OpenBSD

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: >> When 5.0 comes out, I could gladly test it on sparc64, > You'll need -CURRENT for testing anyway, too many KDE-related changes since > release: CMake 2.8.6, Raptor2, wscanf(3), removal of JDK <= 1.5, Qt 4 > updates... > SPARC tests would

Re: Performance problems with OpenBSD 4.9 under ESXi 5

On 1. nov. 2011, at 00.15, carlopmart wrote: > On 10/31/2011 10:01 PM, Tyler Morgan wrote: >> Hi, I setup four 4.9-RELEASE installs under ESXi 5.0.0: >> >> amd64 as "Other" >> amd64 as "FreeBSD" >> i386 as "Other" >> i386 as "FreeBSD" >> >> All 4 got 512megs of RAM, unlimited use of the 8 availabl

Re: Sales & Traffic?? We Can Help!!

On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:50:06 +0530, Sabey Malhotra wrote: >I am Sabey, SEO Consultant > S= Stupid E= Excreta O= Output > > >Advertising in the online world is one of most inexpensive and highly >effective ways of promoting a business. > You have just demonstrated that what you say is bullshit. It

Re: OpenBSD and shebang line to a script not supported?

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Eric Furman wrote: > Nobody cares. This is not a list devoted to > a stupid piece of shit OS developed by the > dumb shit Linus Torvalds. ...But the world's dumbest troll is you.

Re: OpenBSD and shebang line to a script not supported?

Nobody cares. This is not a list devoted to a stupid piece of shit OS developed by the dumb shit Linus Torvalds. On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 7:07 PM, "Joel Wiramu Pauling" wrote: > On 1 November 2011 18:21, "K. AndrC) Braselmann" > wrote: > > > Am 01.11.2011 um 01:08 schrieb Mikolaj Kucharski

Re: Performance problems with OpenBSD 4.9 under ESXi 5

On 11/01/2011 12:47 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote: ESXi 3.5?? Can you test with ESXi 4 U2?? I read his tests to be under 5.0 >> Hi, I setup four 4.9-RELEASE installs under ESXi 5.0.0: Only the host was a 3.5 year old server. You may want to read it again. Best, Daniel Yes, yes ... was my fa

Sales & Traffic?? We Can Help!!

Hello, I am Sabey, SEO Consultant Advertising in the online world is one of most inexpensive and highly effective ways of promoting a business. We are a Leading Indian Based SEO & Web Development Company and one of the very few company which offer organic SEO services with a full range

Re: High interrupt rates after resume

* Leroy van Engelen [111019 19:07]: > This was also seen on a macbook by Jan Stary: > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=131213545109050&w=2 > > And on my Samsung N210: > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=131193104030288&w=2 > > I still have this problem, and ran out of options to investigate.

Re: traffic shaping in OpenBSD

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:26 AM, ZZ Wave wrote: > For example, in FreeBSD there is "slow" pf in userspace and "fast" > kernel-level netgraph. And what has this to do with OpenBSD?

Re: traffic shaping in OpenBSD

ah, you mean nat? In OpenBSD all firewall functions (uhmm, almost all, to be technically correct, in the presence of [t]ftp-proxy) i.e. packet filtering, NAT, shaping are done on the kernel level. On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:26:30 +0400 ZZ Wave wrote: > For example, in FreeBSD there is "slow" pf in

Re: traffic shaping in OpenBSD

On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 12:26:30PM +0400, ZZ Wave wrote: > For example, in FreeBSD there is "slow" pf in userspace and "fast" > kernel-level netgraph. *headasplode* > > 2011/11/1 Gregory Edigarov > > > On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:17:56 +0400 > > ZZ Wave wrote: > > > > > What solution should be used

Re: traffic shaping in OpenBSD

On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 12:26:30PM +0400, ZZ Wave wrote: | For example, in FreeBSD there is "slow" pf in userspace and "fast" | kernel-level netgraph. This isn't a FreeBSD list. This is OpenBSD - pf is in the kernel. And besides .. do you think the cpu runs slower when it's executing userland cod

Re: traffic shaping in OpenBSD

For example, in FreeBSD there is "slow" pf in userspace and "fast" kernel-level netgraph. 2011/11/1 Gregory Edigarov > On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:17:56 +0400 > ZZ Wave wrote: > > > What solution should be used for traffic shaping on real-life, > > "production" gateways with tens and hundreds users?

NUEVO Motorola ex119 LIBRE < $899 > En OFERTA para vos!!!

LA NOVEDAD!!! MOTOROLA EX119 Precio Oferta Lanzamiento $899.- (para ver las caracteristicas del equipo permita mostrar imagenes en le email) El 10 equipo alta gama de Motorola, Dual Sim, para usar con 2 lineas simultaneas de cualquier compaqia!!! ENVIOS A TODO EL PAMS RETIRA PERSONALMENTE EN: -

Re: traffic shaping in OpenBSD

On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 08:53:46 +0100 "Bret S. Lambert" wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 09:47:35AM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:17:56 +0400 > > ZZ Wave wrote: > > > > > What solution should be used for traffic shaping on real-life, > > > "production" gateways with tens

Re: traffic shaping in OpenBSD

On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 09:47:35AM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:17:56 +0400 > ZZ Wave wrote: > > > What solution should be used for traffic shaping on real-life, > > "production" gateways with tens and hundreds users? PF queues seem to > > be too "userspace"-ish and CPU

Re: traffic shaping in OpenBSD

On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:17:56 +0400 ZZ Wave wrote: > What solution should be used for traffic shaping on real-life, > "production" gateways with tens and hundreds users? PF queues seem to > be too "userspace"-ish and CPU consuming. Pardon? What do you mean "userspace"-ish ? -- With best regards

traffic shaping in OpenBSD

What solution should be used for traffic shaping on real-life, "production" gateways with tens and hundreds users? PF queues seem to be too "userspace"-ish and CPU consuming.