Re: X (vesa) doesn't work with recent shapshot

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:15:00PM +0200, Zoran Kolic wrote: > > > How this 16th april snapshot differs from 5.3? > > > I will base my node on "release". > > > > > > > > Thanks, Matthieu! > I was aware of this sched

Re: Blocking traceroute

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:52:00PM -0400, Stuart McMurray wrote: > You don't even need socat. You could do it all with pf. > Except for DNS, though, you'd have to block outbound DNS traffic to > maintain anonymity. It's not possible to redirect outgoing traffic back to local IP where source host

Re: USB Wireless Adapter with hostap

Quoting Ted Unangst : On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 18:28, Vijay Sankar wrote: I am trying to replace an Apple Extreme base station with an OpenBSD router and tried quite a few Linksys/Cisco, D-Link etc., wireless USB adapters but none of them seem to support hostap mode. Everything I tried uses run,

Re: USB Wireless Adapter with hostap

Quoting Erling Westenvik : On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 06:28:23PM -0500, Vijay Sankar wrote: I am trying to replace an Apple Extreme base station with an OpenBSD router and tried quite a few Linksys/Cisco, D-Link etc., wireless USB adapters but none of them seem to support hostap mode. Everything I

nginx in 5.2 without mail proxy features - Reasons?

Today I wanted to test the mail reverse proxy features of nginx. For this I've installed a fresh VM running release 5.2. To my surprise I had to realize that nginx is compiled without the mail proxy features in the base system. [bruno@gateway ~]$ /usr/sbin/nginx -V nginx version: nginx/1.2.2 b

Re: nginx in 5.2 without mail proxy features - Reasons?

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:59:17PM +0200, Bruno Flueckiger wrote: > --without-mail_pop3_module --without-mail_imap_module > --without-mail_smtp_module > > The last two lines show that all three mail modules (POP3/IMAP/SMTP) > had been disabled by configure before compilation took place. > > Can a

Re: ospf and multiple areas

Hi, I got hit by this one yesterday, this time on a different router. The setup looks like this: area .8 | area .0 | area .7 |cisco1|--(ext)|OBSD|(int)---|cisco2| |

Re: nginx in 5.2 without mail proxy features - Reasons?

On 19.04.2013 14:32, Jiri B wrote: I would say maybe because nginx' purpose in base install is to be webserver ? :) You can use one from ports. jirib The ports tree didn't come to my mind when I've been writing my mail. Thanks for the hint. I see the point that it is meant to be a webser

Disappointing ISC BIND performance on OpenBSD 5.3 snapshot

Hello all, quite a few months ago I had evaluated OpenBSD for a large scale anycast DNS resolving setup: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=133828399728289&w=2 The findings at the time (using VMs in a lab environment) was that OpenBSD failed to meet my performance requirements and the main suspi

OpenBSD 5.3 npppd pppoe segmantation fault

hi, I have problem in the OpenBSD -snapshots 5.3 npppd pppoe setting! server's npppd was down for segmantation fault. when client to attache the server. before -current version was fine. but new -snapshots is suck. if anyone could help my problem. please suggest for me. #server #/etc/sysctl.con

OpenBSD 5.3 npppd pppoe segmantation fault

hi, I have problem in the OpenBSD -snapshots 5.3 npppd pppoe setting! server's npppd was down for segmantation fault. when client to attache the server. before -current version was fine. but new -snapshots is suck. if anyone could help my problem. please suggest for me. #server #/etc/sysctl.con

Re: Disappointing ISC BIND performance on OpenBSD 5.3 snapshot

Give up. For the record. I had BIND on Ubuntu 12.04 on Dell R610. It constantly segfaulted for yet unknown reason (lazy to debug). This machine was overloaded with resources. However, not much of load as yours, but I'v tired of this and put all zones to R620 with OpenBSD 5.3. So far not a soun

Re: Disappointing ISC BIND performance on OpenBSD 5.3 snapshot

Kostas Zorbadelos writes: Here is the missing dmesg: OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #40: Tue Mar 26 10:25:59 MDT 2013 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 17082220544 (16290MB) avail mem = 16619790336 (15849MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0:

Re: Disappointing ISC BIND performance on OpenBSD 5.3 snapshot

mxb writes: > Give up. > > For the record. > I had BIND on Ubuntu 12.04 on Dell R610. It constantly segfaulted for yet > unknown reason (lazy to debug). > This machine was overloaded with resources. > > However, not much of load as yours, but I'v tired of this and put all zones > to R620 with O

Re: Disappointing ISC BIND performance on OpenBSD 5.3 snapshot

>From mine point of view, OpenBSD is a stable OS (even some aged snapshots). I don't put any "performance pressure" on it. I just want services to be STABLE. If I want STABLE, I replace Linux or any other with OpenBSD. //mxb On 19 apr 2013, at 20:22, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: > mxb writes: > >

Re: Disappointing ISC BIND performance on OpenBSD 5.3 snapshot

mxb writes: > From mine point of view, OpenBSD is a stable OS (even some aged snapshots). > I don't put any "performance pressure" on it. I just want services to > be STABLE. I really can't speak for the developers, but achieving less that 1/4 of the performance of Linux for DNS and mainly, ach

Re: X (vesa) doesn't work with recent shapshot

Upgraded to 16th april snapshot. Looks fine, except one thing: it seems to dislike usb switch to share keyboard and mouse. I had to remove the switch and put old kb and mouse into the configuration. So far no X antics. Luakit browser experienced some errors, but it was not openbsd problem. Thanks a

Re: Disappointing ISC BIND performance on OpenBSD 5.3 snapshot

Well, I actually told you to "Give up" in my first mail :) So do it. In your env. in is(probably) better to run Linux. Do it. I just tell you MINE point of view. If your don't want to hear it - I'll shut up. P.S. std. answer to ANY on this list - You ever contribute with code or you wait for y

Re: relayd on active-active CARP

OT: as of 5.3 its is NOT possible to have several "check" statements - last one rules over the rest. Hopefully this can change. Currently I have to specify two(2) checks in check_web.sh: 1. http-code 200 2. telnet, which returns '1' or '0' 2) is a check if I upgrade machine or not Eg. port 80 m