Re: Route Bad address or network unreacheable

2013-05-26 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
Cesar Calvo admin at urulab.com writes: All packets from net1 ip are delivery via 190.64.x.x gateway. But on openbsd, route syntax is different. I have hostname.em0 with: inet 200.124.200.125 255.255.255.248 none !route add 190.64.x.x -iface em0 Above route add syntax seems strange to me.

Re: Hyper-V drivers?

2013-05-26 Thread Edho Arief
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote: Guillaume Filion g...@logidac.com writes: I did some tests with OpenBSD 5.3 running as a Hyper-V 2012 virtual machine and the performance is disappointing (see

Re: Hyper-V drivers?

2013-05-26 Thread Anders Berggren
At the risk of sounding like an idiot, did you do anything particular in the OpenBSD configuration to make Hyper-V's Legacy Network Adapter work? I can't seem to make it do so--OpenBSD picks it up as de0, and I've configured /etc/hostname.de0 appropriately. The same Hyper-V setup works okay

Re: Route Bad address or network unreacheable

2013-05-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-05-25, Cesar Calvo ad...@urulab.com wrote: Hi people. I have a linux server a try to migrate to openbsd 5.3/amd64. I am totatly new in this amazing OS. In linux I have: - ip addr 200.124.200.125/32 dev net1 - ip route add 190.64.x.x dev net1 - ip route add default via

updated shared X libs missing in sparc64 snapshots from 2013-05-26

2013-05-26 Thread Markus Lude
Hi, be careful with the latest x sets on sparc64 from 2013-05-26. The shared X libs which were updated recently are missing. Regards, Markus

Re: Route Bad address or network unreacheable

2013-05-26 Thread Cesar Calvo
Hi, thanks for sharing http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=134643340822363 hostname.if: !route add -llinfo -iface -net 10.255.0.0/16 10.255.255.1 -ifp nfe0 inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.255 inet 1.2.4.3 255.255.255.255 ... mygate: 10.255.255.1 I change all inet values for sanbox testing

Re: divert-to with bridge

2013-05-26 Thread Patrick Wildt
Hi Luiz, I actually have seen that on a bridge setup I had, too. Although the divert-to points to localhost, I see the packet trying to pass out on the interface to the original destination, as your data shows, too. No idea why that's happening though. \Patrick Am 23.05.2013 um 22:45 schrieb

Re: updated shared X libs missing in sparc64 snapshots from 2013-05-26

2013-05-26 Thread Zoran Kolic
The same seems to be the case for amd64. Anyway, spite error warnings, X works. Zoran

Re: Seeking GUI refuge

2013-05-26 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi, On 05/26/13 05:21, Patrick Mc(avery wrote: I am still on Linux on my primary desktop. I loaded a few GNUstep apps from the repos, your right, they don't look that bad and yes, I am sure they can be tweaked even if they did. Your sleek theme looks very promising. :) good. Yes

Re: Route Bad address or network unreacheable

2013-05-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/05/26 12:52, Cesar Calvo wrote: Hi, thanks for sharing http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=134643340822363 hostname.if: !route add -llinfo -iface -net 10.255.0.0/16 10.255.255.1 -ifp nfe0 inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.255 inet 1.2.4.3 255.255.255.255 ... mygate:

Unable to get ftp-proxy to work as expected when using authpf

2013-05-26 Thread Steven
Hi, Over my wired network (not using authpf) I can connect to ftp sites over ftp-proxy fine. Similarly when connecting to ftp sites over my wifi without authpf. However, using authpf on my wifi gives me errors when connecting to ftp sites over ftp-proxy. In man authpf(8) the following

Seeking GUI refuge

2013-05-26 Thread Jan Lambertz
Hi Patrick, My Gui problem is (was) quite similar. I was searching intensivly for a correct,fast,non bloated desktop manager for years. I have checked at least 10 products ( non windows ) and in the end i felt depressed,like you. So what saved my live ? At work i had to build an environment for