Old Sony Vaio and ACPI problem

2014-03-18 Thread hannu . vuolasaho
Hello everyone! I'm trying to run rather old 32-bit Sony Vaio with 5.4 fresh install. Its chassis says Sony-Vaio-PCG-7M1M and dmesg bios0: Sony Corporation VGN-FS515B Anyway. If I have APM enabled iwi0 doesn't work. On the other hand if I disable apm from UKC I get thermal shutdown but iwi wor

A small package browser

2014-03-18 Thread marst
Really, nothing out of the ordinary... Been working lately on a simple OpenBSD package browser. No extensive graphics, works from the terminal with navigation similar to vim. I do this for fun. I find it convenient for exploring existing packages. Small description and screenshot available her

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-18 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 18-03-2014 18:18, Ted Unangst escreveu: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:23, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > >> anything these days using dynamic ip addresses. If your IP address >> changes you will stay a few seconds without receiving any mail, and also >> may have some mail delayed, but you shouldn't

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-18 Thread Ted Unangst
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:23, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > anything these days using dynamic ip addresses. If your IP address > changes you will stay a few seconds without receiving any mail, and also > may have some mail delayed, but you shouldn't lose anything. And you can Unless of course the

Re: link in faq leads to inexisting page

2014-03-18 Thread Fred
On 03/18/14 19:13, Marko Cupać wrote: Hi, I just noticed that link "FTP Reviewed": http://www.pintday.org/whitepapers/ftp-review.shtml ...in "More information on FTP" section of "PF: Issues with FTP": http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html#info ...leads to inexisting page. Perhaps this could

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-18 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 18-03-2014 15:56, Kevin Chadwick escreveu: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:23:12 -0300 > Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > > It's perfectly useful, mail is only dropped by some idiotic systems > (already mentioned) that don't understand or care about more effective > anti spam methods or the little guy and

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:23:12 -0300 Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > A static IP address without a meaningful reverse name mapping such as > mail.myopenbsdhomeserver.com isn't very useful. Most ISP's wont do > reverse mappings or will charge your eyeballs for it. It's perfectly useful, mail is only dr

link in faq leads to inexisting page

2014-03-18 Thread Marko Cupać
Hi, I just noticed that link "FTP Reviewed": http://www.pintday.org/whitepapers/ftp-review.shtml ...in "More information on FTP" section of "PF: Issues with FTP": http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html#info ...leads to inexisting page. Perhaps this could be fixed. -- Marko Cupać

pf and nat

2014-03-18 Thread Friedrich Locke
Hi folks, i am studying pf and a doubt arose! Since my state policy if if-bound (set state-policy if-bound) i need two rules for each traffic i want to pass. Is that understanding right ? For instance, for nat i could : pass out on tl0 from dc0:network to any nat-to tl0 pass in on dc0 from dc0

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-18 Thread Jan Stary
> I'm looking for a more private ESP. Personally, I am also fed up with people interfering with my earthquake precognitions.

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-18 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 18-03-2014 09:44, Kevin Chadwick escreveu: > previously on this list Jean-Philippe Ouellet contributed: > >> Also, "absolutely sure privacy is totally respected"??? >> Let me know when you find a jurisdiction in which you can reasonably >> expect that to even be possible to begin with. > Yeah, I

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-18 Thread James Shupe
On 3/15/2014 11:54 AM, Jean-Francois Simon wrote: Hello all, I'm looking for a secure mail provider, i fpossible using OpenBSD, also wondering if OpenBSD itself provides it for interested people. If anybody has informations thanks would be interesting to share. Regards Jeff Get an inexpensive

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-18 Thread Craig R. Skinner
On 2014-03-17 Mon 20:25 PM |, Jean-Francois Simon wrote: > > Just to mention, I'm looking for a more private ESP. As I know that > OpenBSD conveys an idea of security, I tend to trust a provider > relying on this OS. > > >If you want to read documentation, become your own "mail provider > >using

Re: install55.fs

2014-03-18 Thread Marcus MERIGHI
sven.falem...@gmail.com (sven falempin), 2014.03.18 (Tue) 13:58 (CET): > For usbs ? is this what you are looking for? ``USB install image for OpenBSD 5.5 - TESTING REQUIRED'' http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=139362793608228 Bye, Marcus

install55.fs

2014-03-18 Thread sven falempin
For usbs ? -- - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
previously on this list Jean-Philippe Ouellet contributed: > Also, "absolutely sure privacy is totally respected"??? > Let me know when you find a jurisdiction in which you can reasonably > expect that to even be possible to begin with. Yeah, I believe you have to pin STARTTLS for each host manua

Re: obsd pf

2014-03-18 Thread Marko Cupać
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 01:15:16 + (UTC) Stuart Henderson wrote: > The ruleset is now traversed in order, changes made in match rules > are "sticky" and affect rules lower down in the ruleset. More > predictable, no more "oh this 'nat pass' rule which you included > halfway down the ruleset actua

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014-03-17, Jean-Francois Simon wrote: > Just to mention, I'm looking for a more private ESP. As I know that > OpenBSD conveys an idea of security, I tend to trust a provider relying > on this OS. "conveys an idea of security" won't help you if the provider uses bad mail daemons or configura

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-18 Thread Zé Loff
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:02:00PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > > The last time I checked (and it was a long time ago), GMail rewrote > > either the sender or the reply-to address with the one you use to > > authenticate the connection. Again, it might not be true now, but it > > has happened to

Re: ffs2

2014-03-18 Thread Craig R. Skinner
On 2014-03-17 Mon 21:19 PM |, Adam Thompson wrote: > OK, obviously I missed something. > How do you resize ffs filesystems without a dump/restore step? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/207756

Re: current/macppc on a Powerbook6,1

2014-03-18 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 17/03/14(Mon) 13:58, James Hartley wrote: > Has the information in FAQ7.4 changed? That indicates that virtual > terminals are only supported on amd64, i386, & Alpha. Zaurus has limited > support, but with a different keystroke patterns. Indeed since 5.4 macppc also supports virtual consoles,