On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:04:23AM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:12:49PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
Hello misc@
I once created an USB stick (uSDHC card with reader, actually) using
OpenBSD 5.4 (might have been an
* Andy a...@brandwatch.com [2014-08-05 18:06]:
Correct me if I'm wrong here Henning, but we have always used the approach
of only ever assigning queues to the physical interface (whether it has
VLANs or not), as this means that both the physical interfaces untagged
network, plus all the tagged
* Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com [2014-08-05 18:36]:
On 05-08-2014 03:36, Henning Brauer wrote:
the 90s are over.
Yep, I know Henning. Vlan's are pretty secure. But they add complexity
and if you use physical separation you can mitigate problems caused by
misconfiguration. Either
On 2014-08-06, Todd Zimmermann toddo.zimmerm...@gmail.com wrote:
What eliminated the weirdness was binding to the wildcard addy:
unbound.conf
interface: 0.0.0.0
Careful with this, it is usually a bad idea because it means that you
generate reply packets with the source address
On 2014-08-05, David Dahlberg david.dahlb...@fkie.fraunhofer.de wrote:
I do not know enough of Cisco to be able to tell you whether or not
one may cluster their routers/VPN gateways. But you have multiple
options to emulate the fallback behaviour that you described above.
1) Just configure
On 2014-08-01, Mike Larkin mlar...@azathoth.net wrote:
I know other people have said that hostap mode is not
stable but on this machine it's been rock solid.
Historically there have been problems where a setup could be completely
stable, then move it to a different environment
On 2014-08-04, Christophe t...@stuxnet.org wrote:
Second question :
I used to write route-to and reply-to rules in pf.conf in a static context.
As far as I've seen, there are modifiers on interface specifications
like :network or :peer. But is there a :gateway or something similar
telling pf
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:04:23AM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:12:49PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
Hello misc@
I once created an USB stick (uSDHC card with reader,
Am Dienstag, den 05.08.2014, 17:05 +0100 schrieb Andy:
Considering all this, there should never be a good reason to apply
queues to the VLAN interfaces at all?
Well, there may be. For example a VLAN may indeed just represent a port
on a switch elsewhere. Where a certain policy applies (e.g.
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 11:43:37PM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:04:23AM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
: : : :
My guess is that if there has been a metadata format change in softraid
it
previously on this list Stuart Henderson contributed:
on this machine it's been rock solid.
Historically there have been problems where a setup could be completely
stable, then move it to a different environment (different clients around?
different other APs? I'm not sure) and it would
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:06:54PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014-08-01, Mike Larkin mlar...@azathoth.net wrote:
I know other people have said that hostap mode is not
stable but on this machine it's been rock solid.
Historically there have been problems where a
On 06-08-2014 05:34, Henning Brauer wrote:
Your preferences are your preferences, you're free to do that - just
like you're free to stab a knife in your eye.
Not sure I'd go with this analogy. Here in my country things are a
little different. Not always the networks are correctly configured.
On 01-08-2014 15:47, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
I wonder if a short list of access mode capable devices or chipsets
that are known to work well for atleast 24 hours or maybe 60 days would
be a good addition to the access point section of the faq (6.13)
especially with OpenBSD being such a good
On 2014-08-04, Eric Dilmore ericdilm...@gmail.com wrote:
I just set up a new OpenBSD 5.5 gateway for a small nonprofit. The
gateway has one external interface and one internal, with the internal
network split into several VLANs: one for secure traffic, one for
guests, one for internal phones,
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
In my (admittedly very limited) testing with the new queueing system,
it hasn't done very well with low bandwidth queues (ADSL type speeds) that
used to work OK with altq (symptom, packets being assigned to queues as
Hello,
I am testing (playing with it, too) bridge capabilities in OpenBSD and with
this sequence of commands:
ifconfig bridge0 add et1
for i in `jot - 0 500 1`; do ifconfig vether$i create; ifconfig vether$i
up; ifconfig bridge0 add vether$i; done
ifconfig vether500 192.168.1.1/24
ifconfig
The version numbers of less and perl in 56.html are incorrect.
Here are the links to the commit messages:
for perl:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=139567356426747w=2
for less:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=139843312032453w=2
Index: 56.html
Hi Stuart,
Appreciate the feedback.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014-08-06, Todd Zimmermann toddo.zimmerm...@gmail.com wrote:
What eliminated the weirdness was binding to the wildcard addy:
unbound.conf
interface: 0.0.0.0
Careful
Dear OpenBSD users,
We have a new hp proliant dl 320e gen 8 server with 2 x 1TB Hard
disks. When we are going to install Open BSD 5.5 64 bit, Openbsd can't
detect These 2 Hard disks ( 2 x 1 TB)
These are 2 hard disks of 7.2 K SATA 1 TB
It asks which is the Hard disk with this sign ? '
It does
That machine apparently ships with Dynamic Smart Array B120i
which has a vendor specific software RAID mode.
Looks like it only works on Linux with a closed source 'hpvsa' driver
https://access.redhat.com/articles/118133
See if you can switch it to a standard AHCI/SATA mode in the bios.
On Thu,
21 matches
Mail list logo
