> > If you don't understand that snapshots get built, that libraries
> > crank, that there are PEOPLE building this, that the data takes time
> > to get to the mirrors, and that this is a non-static situation, that
> > small catch-up syncronization errors are made, that they get fixed by
> > real p
On 2014-12-11, Stan Gammons wrote:
> Ok. The way I normally update is by downloading the install5x.iso, make
> the cd and boot from it, do an upgrade, reboot, do a sysmerge, then do
> pkg_add -u. After all the failures because of the library mismatch, kde4
> will no longer start due to an ssl li
Hi misc,
I have about 600 destinations to reach via wan1 and wan2.( 300 via wan1
and 300 via wan2 )
my /etc/mygate is *wan_gw1*
Let's say *ip_list1 and *
*ip_list2. **Let's assume /etc/ip_list1 and *
*/etc/ip_list2 have ip addresses in this format /etc/ip_list1* *(this
consists of about 30
> The conversation is very META.
What is META?
That it is a discussion about a discussion, not about any topic of its own.
2014-12-11 12:37 GMT+01:00 Mihai Popescu :
> > The conversation is very META.
>
>
> What is META?
>
>
--
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:27:46 -0500
"STeve Andre'" wrote:
> You might want to subscribe to the ports-changes changes list,
> which will show you what's been changed. The source-changes
> list will show you all the other cvs commits. Look at
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
Btw, now that th
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:59:55AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> Btw, now that the topic has come up. Is there a way to view the
> diffs quickly on a source- or port-change?
Not official and not instantly updated:
http://anoncvs.estpak.ee/cgi-bin/cgit/openbsd-ports/log/
--
Oliver PETER oli.
you could try http://anoncvs.estpak.ee/cgi-bin/cgit/openbsd-ports/log/
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:59 AM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:27:46 -0500
> "STeve Andre'" wrote:
>
> > You might want to subscribe to the ports-changes changes list,
> > which will show you what's been changed. T
Followup:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> What're the recommended input methods for Japanese and Spanish?
I have got Japanese input running and useable, by installing the packages
ja-fonts-gnu
ja-sazanami-ttf
ja-mplus-ttf
ibus-anthy
with pkg_add . I'm not comfortable that t
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> Followup:
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> What're the recommended input methods for Japanese and Spanish?
>
> I have got Japanese input running and useable, by installing the packages
>
> ja-fonts-gnu
> ja-sazanami-ttf
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:07:35PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> I have got Japanese input running and useable, by installing the packages
>
> ja-fonts-gnu
> ja-sazanami-ttf
> ja-mplus-ttf
> ibus-anthy
>
> with pkg_add . I'm not comfortable that this is the most optimal way
> to do it, but it allows
TL,DR:
Queries to DNS server over IPSec made using host or dig work OK,
requests made by e.g. ping exit the enc0 interface but don't show up on
enc0 on the other end.
Hi all
I'm puzzled by some weird stuff happening with DNS queries over IPSec. I
have a fully working tunnel over a roaming laptop
On 2014-12-11, Oliver Peter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:59:55AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
>> Btw, now that the topic has come up. Is there a way to view the
>> diffs quickly on a source- or port-change?
>
> Not official and not instantly updated:
> http://anoncvs.estpak.ee/cgi-bin/cgit/o
On 12/11/14 05:59, FRIGN wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:27:46 -0500
"STeve Andre'" wrote:
You might want to subscribe to the ports-changes changes list,
which will show you what's been changed. The source-changes
list will show you all the other cvs commits. Look at
http://www.openbsd.org/ma
One of my favorite ports is pfstat. I've used it religiously for
years with minor firewalls for bandwidth and queue graphs. When ALTQ
was retired, pfstat could no longer graph my queues and this is still
the case today. The correct behavior here would be for me to roll up
my college-level C slee
Hello @misc,
This mail is regarding about issues that im facing after doing a fresh
install of 5.6 RELEASE and snapshot on my latptop
The point is that after installing sucessfully i am trying to start X but
screen goes black. The only way i have to go to console is pressing
CTRL+ALT+F1 after lid
Hi, guys.
This might be more a question for ports@ but it is also a general "do
you use it" question.
I've been trying to help the MOC maintainer with testing changes on OpenBSD.
He wants to use some newer POSIX features but it seems that if he does
so, he'll have to leave OpenBSD behind. I
I've used MOC quite a bit on OpenBSD, though just a local compile -
nothing fancy like a port. It's probably the only non-base program I
ever use on the Sparc 5.
What specifically is missing?
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Richard Toohey
wrote:
> Hi, guys.
>
> This might be more a question for
whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a
`pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects is grab a
fresh source tree and compile them manually. for example, libc:
cd /usr/src/lib/libc
edit 'shlib_version' to have the appropriate major/minor versions
(pkg
On 2014-12-11 22:46:48, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> > Followup:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> >> What're the recommended input methods for Japanese and Spanish?
> >
> > I have got Japanese input running and useable, by ins
>The maintainer has asked the same question on a MOC forum:
I'll take the first option:
>1. Stop using MOC
I'm a user of MOC when using Linux, because it's simple to config, but I think
the OpenBSD Project will be fine without MOC updates, and the users can switch
to mpd.
On 07/12/14 23:37, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2014-12-06 9:45 GMT+01:00 Riley Baird
> :
>> I have a few questions about OpenBSD's trademark policy. (I tried
>> looking, but I couldn't find a document.)
>
> Is OpenBSD actually a registered trademark? The USPTO doesn't list it.
> FreeBSD is, though.
On 07/12/14 23:42, Kaspars Bankovskis wrote:
> Your changes to the system will be very small, and most of the time
> you'll be just renaming 'openbsd' to something else, and syncing back
> changes from upstream. If you have time for that, lucky you. But there
> are more useful things to do, don't y
On 08/12/14 00:36, Bryan Steele wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:35:03PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
>> I agree entirely. For this reason, I think it would be best to keep
>> system internals (e.g. uname, includes, etc.) using the name OpenBSD
>> with only the main user-visible parts changed to a
Riley Baird wrote:
> On 07/12/14 23:42, Kaspars Bankovskis wrote:
> > Your changes to the system will be very small, and most of the time
> > you'll be just renaming 'openbsd' to something else, and syncing back
> > changes from upstream. If you have time for that, lucky you. But there
> > are mo
On 08/12/14 01:00, Luiz Roberto dos Santos wrote:
> At 7 Dec 2014 12:42:41 + (UTC) from Kaspars Bankovskis
> :
>> there are more useful things to do, don't you think so?
> Agree. Riley, I think you don't get the point here. The firmware blob are
> *not* running on the system, but on device.
>
On 12/12/14 15:25, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
> Riley Baird wrote:
>
>> On 07/12/14 23:42, Kaspars Bankovskis wrote:
>>> Your changes to the system will be very small, and most of the time
>>> you'll be just renaming 'openbsd' to something else, and syncing back
>>> changes from upstream. If you h
> On 12/12/14 15:25, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
> > Riley Baird wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/12/14 23:42, Kaspars Bankovskis wrote:
> >>> Your changes to the system will be very small, and most of the time
> >>> you'll be just renaming 'openbsd' to something else, and syncing back
> >>> changes from upst
On 08/12/14 01:07, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Riley Baird said:
>> However, remember that if someone doesn't know much about OpenBSD, they
>> will either: a) think that OpenBSD does not contain binary-only firmware
>> due to the "Blob-Busters" marketing or b) not know where to look to
>> remove i
On 12/12/14 15:36, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> On 12/12/14 15:25, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
>>> Riley Baird wrote:
>>>
On 07/12/14 23:42, Kaspars Bankovskis wrote:
> Your changes to the system will be very small, and most of the time
> you'll be just renaming 'openbsd' to something else,
I applied the newest unbound patch to several amd64 machines without
trouble, and have had issues on several of my i386 boxes. The initial
error was probably the same as below, but led me to believe I may have
had some kind of kernel or system "frankenbox" behavior. I used cvs to
pull all the lat
> I applied the newest unbound patch to several amd64 machines without
> trouble, and have had issues on several of my i386 boxes.
You were running -stable:
OpenBSD 5.6-stable (GENERIC.MP) #0: Thu Dec 11 19:34:10 UTC 2014
> The initial
> error was probably the same as below, but led me to be
Hey man,
I'm not sure about what is happening, but pflog is your best friend ever !
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/logging.html
Try find out if a specific rule is blocking traffic in one of endpoints (
both ? )
Cheers,
2014-12-11 14:13 GMT-02:00 Zé Loff :
> TL,DR:
> Queries to DNS server over
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:05:46PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I applied the newest unbound patch to several amd64 machines without
> > trouble, and have had issues on several of my i386 boxes.
>
> You were running -stable:
>
> OpenBSD 5.6-stable (GENERIC.MP) #0: Thu Dec 11 19:34:10 UTC 2
On 12.12.2014 02:50, Leonardo Santagostini wrote:
Hello @misc,
This mail is regarding about issues that im facing after doing a
fresh
install of 5.6 RELEASE and snapshot on my latptop
The point is that after installing sucessfully i am trying to start X
but
screen goes black. The only way i
On 12.12.2014 03:00, Richard Toohey wrote:
Hi, guys.
This might be more a question for ports@ but it is also a general "do
you use it" question.
I've been trying to help the MOC maintainer with testing changes on
OpenBSD.
He wants to use some newer POSIX features but it seems that if he
does
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 15:00, Richard Toohey wrote:
> (3) can help with the POSIX questions.
>
> The maintainer has asked the same question on a MOC forum:
>
> http://moc.daper.net/node/1369
I have no idea what posix features they want, so it's a tough question.
unistd.h does say
#define _POS
On 12/12/14 01:50, Leonardo Santagostini wrote:
Hello @misc,
This mail is regarding about issues that im facing after doing a fresh
install of 5.6 RELEASE and snapshot on my latptop
The point is that after installing sucessfully i am trying to start X but
screen goes black. The only way i have
38 matches
Mail list logo
