Re: AMD64 packages

2014-12-12 Thread ian kremlin
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > There are dragons. > ingo, theo: sorry to post toxic advice, and thanks for the knowledge. i did not realize how shlib_version worked. i must have gotten lucky with my build but i should go back and fix it properly now ian

Re: AMD64 packages

2014-12-12 Thread Stan Gammons
On Dec 12, 2014 1:06 PM, "Theo de Raadt" wrote: > > > ian kremlin wrote on Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:04:26PM -0500: > > > > > whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a > > > `pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects > > > > Definitely not the easiest w

Re: AMD64 packages

2014-12-12 Thread Theo de Raadt
> ian kremlin wrote on Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:04:26PM -0500: > > > whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a > > `pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects > > Definitely not the easiest way. Waiting for the next snapshot is > definitely much easie

Re: AMD64 packages

2014-12-12 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Ian, ian kremlin wrote on Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:04:26PM -0500: > whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a > `pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects Definitely not the easiest way. Waiting for the next snapshot is definitely much easier and

Re: AMD64 packages

2014-12-12 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014-12-12, ian kremlin wrote: > whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a > `pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects is grab a > fresh source tree and compile them manually. for example, libc: > > cd /usr/src/lib/libc > > edit 'shlib_version' to

Re: CPU power consumption on thinkpad x201 on openbsd current

2014-12-12 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 11:08:42PM +0200, Johan Svensson wrote: > I'm trying to migrate from Linux to Openbsd on my laptop (thinkpad x201). > > The first problem that i came across was that the Cpu fanspeed was running > constantly at 3500RPM. > After the acpithinkpad.c patch from jcs (and i modif

Re: OpenBSD 5.6 - amd64 on Lenovo G480

2014-12-12 Thread Ville Valkonen
On 12 December 2014 at 03:50, Leonardo Santagostini wrote: > Hello @misc, > > This mail is regarding about issues that im facing after doing a fresh > install of 5.6 RELEASE and snapshot on my latptop > > The point is that after installing sucessfully i am trying to start X but > screen goes black

Re: Xorg fails PIII agp

2014-12-12 Thread Koko Wijatmoko
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:03:56 -0430 elvis fuentes wrote: > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream > which had a name of LogXorg5.6] > > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream > which had a name of dmesg54] > > [demime 1.01d removed an a

Xorg fails PIII agp

2014-12-12 Thread elvis fuentes
hi guys moving from openbsd 5.4 to 5.6 with a fresh install I've found Xorg refuse to work. I leave a Xorg and dmesg file with 5.4 and 5.6. In the case of 5.4 xorg just works out of the box. I really don't know what is missing. thnks !! [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/o

Re: problems compiling i386 from source (patching)

2014-12-12 Thread Remco
li...@ggp2.com wrote: > I applied the newest unbound patch to several amd64 machines without > trouble, and have had issues on several of my i386 boxes. The initial > error was probably the same as below, but led me to believe I may have > had some kind of kernel or system "frankenbox" behavior.

Re: Music On Console (MOC)

2014-12-12 Thread Richard Toohey
On 12/12/14 19:48, Ted Unangst wrote: On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 15:00, Richard Toohey wrote: (3) can help with the POSIX questions. The maintainer has asked the same question on a MOC forum: http://moc.daper.net/node/1369 I have no idea what posix features they want, so it's a tough question.

Re: DNS over IPSec weirdness

2014-12-12 Thread David Dahlberg
First of all, I have no real clue. It sound weird. But maybe I can help you at least with that one: Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2014, 16:13 + schrieb Zé Loff: > However, if I try to do something like "ping -c 1 www_lan.foo.bar" (or > e.g. ssh) I can see the packets with the DNS request pass throu