On 05.03.2015 08:14, Nils Reuße wrote:
On 04.03.2015 22:42, Jason Adams wrote:
On 03/04/2015 01:16 PM, Nils Reuße wrote:
On 04.03.2015 02:39, Jason Adams wrote:
Somewhere along the road of moving from 5.5 to 5.6 (i386) my performance in X
has really taken a hit
when dragging windows around.
On 04.03.2015 22:42, Jason Adams wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 01:16 PM, Nils ReuÃe wrote:
>> On 04.03.2015 02:39, Jason Adams wrote:
>>> Somewhere along the road of moving from 5.5 to 5.6 (i386) my performance in
>>> X has really taken a hit
>>> when dragging windows around. The window trails the poin
Hi,
My goal was to make cvs (in base) to show a template (with files
commiting) in editor when "cvs commit" is executed. E.g.:
Modified files: program.c program.h
Fix: __fill this up__
Comments: __fill this up__
Where "program.c program.h" is auto filled in (by cvs hooks?). The
reason for this i
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:12:09PM -0800, Jason Adams wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 04:34 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:39:51PM -0800, Jason Adams wrote:
> >> Somewhere along the road of moving from 5.5 to 5.6 (i386) my performance
> >> in X has really taken a hit
> >> when drag
Get done! I forgot the http header "Content-Type'.
2015-03-04 22:26 GMT-03:00 Antonio Feitosa :
> HI I made the correct configuration to run bgplg script, but somehow I
> can't run ksh script. I already made the copy of /bin/ksh to
> /var/www/bin/sh and fix the permission of script file. The web p
HI I made the correct configuration to run bgplg script, but somehow I
can't run ksh script. I already made the copy of /bin/ksh to
/var/www/bin/sh and fix the permission of script file. The web page
appears blank, with no data, but bgplg works.
Somebody knows how to fix that?
Regards,
--
Anton
This sounds like:
"As with a knife one could cut throats, let's start eating only with the
fork. Oh, btw, but also the fork could poke, so let's use just the spoon."
Using netcat or ftp to browse the web/intranet/localhost in the 3rd
millennium is like eating a steak with a spoon.
It's the same
>On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, at 07:37 AM, someone wrote:
>> "interoperable" - you mean there are still softwares that really count
>> and
>> still cannot use/support HIGH ciphers? wow. What a world we live in.. :\
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Miod Vallat wrote:
>>
>> > > "Sometimes you have to
>"interoperable" - you mean there are still softwares that really count and
>still cannot use/support HIGH ciphers? wow. What a world we live in.. :\
Look, stop being a child. There are plenty of discussions about this
topic in many places.
>> So, remove Xombrero from base too, he segfault everytime
> Done!
Hey, wait! The plan was to improve browsers, wasn't it?
That's not the same thing as deleting them, you know!
Then again, if we set the firefox to keep the tedu (err... or
was it the other way round...?) we need not be surpised
On 03/04/2015 04:34 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:39:51PM -0800, Jason Adams wrote:
>> Somewhere along the road of moving from 5.5 to 5.6 (i386) my performance in
>> X has really taken a hit
>> when dragging windows around. The window trails the pointer by several
>> inch
Hi,
Updating the situation, I already used -stable, and I am using now
-current, and still the problem.
I tried some browsers like (firefox, midori and chromium), and they get
really slow when I am watching a html5 video, and it freezes all the
time if the video is in HD.
Here is almost all the p
On 03/04/2015 01:16 PM, Nils Reuße wrote:
> On 04.03.2015 02:39, Jason Adams wrote:
>> Somewhere along the road of moving from 5.5 to 5.6 (i386) my performance in
>> X has really taken a hit
>> when dragging windows around. The window trails the pointer by several
>> inches. X performance used
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:15 PM, L.R. D.S. wrote:
>>1) lynx has some amazingly insecure code
>
> So, remove Xombrero from base too, he segfault everytime
> and is much more insecure due to ECMAscript engine of WebKit.
>
>>curl
>
> Please guys, a browser is different from a http/ftp downloader. A
>
L.R. D.S. wrote:
> So, remove Xombrero from base too, he segfault everytime
Done!
On 04.03.2015 02:39, Jason Adams wrote:
Somewhere along the road of moving from 5.5 to 5.6 (i386) my performance in X
has really taken a hit
when dragging windows around. The window trails the pointer by several inches.
X performance used
to be surprisingly good on 5.5.
I note the following
>1) lynx has some amazingly insecure code
So, remove Xombrero from base too, he segfault everytime
and is much more insecure due to ECMAscript engine of WebKit.
>curl
Please guys, a browser is different from a http/ftp downloader. A
browser have HTML parser, and funcionality's for you... ahm...
On 4 March 2015, Manuel Giraud wrote:
> Ed Ahlsen-Girard writes:
>
> > I decided to upgrade the internal drive, so I hooked up the new on on
> > the CD's usual SATA channel and installed, having adjust the disklabel
> > more to suit me (the auto partition of /usr left it really tight on
> > spac
They are just using what the softwares provide.
https://jve.linuxwall.info/blog/index.php?post/TLS_Survey
This guy scanned Alexa's list of top 1,000,000 websites. At "janvier 11
2014". 45% of them had TLS support.
1.23% of websites only accept 3DES, and 1.56% of websites only accept RC4.
PFS su
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:15:58PM GMT, sven falempin wrote:
> YES,
>
> lookup file bind,
>
> (but i did delete the line completly and it wasnt working.)
Hmmm... then the behaviour you describe seems to both contradict my own
experience (double-checked a second ago) as well as the 'resolv.conf(
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Jeff St. George wrote:
> Its not in my pay grade to offer a technical opinion on Lynx removal!
> But ,,WHAT r u folks using instead, considering??
>
typically when I am setting up a server I have a laptop with me. the
laptop will either have my pre-planni
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On
> Behalf Of Bob Eby
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 10:11 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: lynx is gone?
>
> Lynx is gone. Wow just wow, I'm stupefied by just how much you guys have
> removed from
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 06:54:20PM GMT, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> Raf,
Lee,
> No issue there, .. but rsync is much better than anything IN base for
> file synchronization (cross-filesystem, works over ssh [et al], properly
> handles permissions and hardlinks, . ). If there is
On 2015-03-04, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
curling the mirrors page is another.
This was my first thought. I don't think this is out of anyone's league if they
are already choosing to install OpenBSD.
On 3/4/15, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 04/03/15(Wed) 10:49, patrick keshishian wrote:
>> On 3/4/15, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> > Hello again
>> >
>> > On 27/02/15(Fri) 11:40, patrick keshishian wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I can confirm this change alone causes no adverse, observable
>> >> change on my x120
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 06:47:38PM GMT, sven falempin wrote:
>
> > # i did play around with the file resolv.conf
> > # cat /etc/resolv.conf
> > lookup file
> > nameserver 127.0.0.1
> > nameserver 8.8.8.8
> > # because i dont get it i even did t
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 06:47:38PM GMT, sven falempin wrote:
> # i did play around with the file resolv.conf
> # cat /etc/resolv.conf
> lookup file
> nameserver 127.0.0.1
> nameserver 8.8.8.8
> # because i dont get it i even did that
> # cat /etc/resolv.conf.tail
> nameserver 8.8.8.8
This is due
On 04-03-2015 15:48, Jeff St. George wrote:
> Its not in my pay grade to offer a technical opinion on Lynx removal!
> But ,,WHAT r u folks using instead, considering??
Well, for the task the OP mentioned, finding a mirror for pkg_add, you
could do plenty of things to accomplish that. netcat
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, at 07:37 AM, someone wrote:
> "interoperable" - you mean there are still softwares that really count
> and
> still cannot use/support HIGH ciphers? wow. What a world we live in.. :\
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Miod Vallat wrote:
>
> > > "Sometimes you have to break th
On 04/03/15(Wed) 10:49, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On 3/4/15, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Hello again
> >
> > On 27/02/15(Fri) 11:40, patrick keshishian wrote:
> >>
> >> I can confirm this change alone causes no adverse, observable
> >> change on my x120e's touchpad.
> >
> > Could you guys confirm
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> I was meant to mention it but given the issues the OP had with (seemingly)
> simple 'tar' syntax, I did not want to get into explaining yet another
> tool (i.e. trailing slash, etc.). Besides, it's not in base.
>
> Regards,
>
> Raf
>
Raf,
No is
On 3/4/15, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Hello again
>
> On 27/02/15(Fri) 11:40, patrick keshishian wrote:
>>
>> I can confirm this change alone causes no adverse, observable
>> change on my x120e's touchpad.
>
> Could you guys confirm that the last fix from Ulf also fixes your issue?
>
> https://marc.
# i did play around with the file resolv.conf
# cat /etc/resolv.conf
lookup file
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver 8.8.8.8
# because i dont get it i even did that
# cat /etc/resolv.conf.tail
nameserver 8.8.8.8
[0]-[router]-[~]
# host google.ca
google.ca has address 173.194.45.47
google.ca has addres
Its not in my pay grade to offer a technical opinion on Lynx removal!
But ,,WHAT r u folks using instead, considering??
thanks OpenBSD
> "interoperable" - you mean there are still softwares that really count and
> still cannot use/support HIGH ciphers? wow. What a world we live in.. :\
There are still idiots top-posting, why wouldn't there be idiots
misconfiguring TLS servers or not giving a damn?
Miod
"interoperable" - you mean there are still softwares that really count and
still cannot use/support HIGH ciphers? wow. What a world we live in.. :\
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > "Sometimes you have to break things to make it better"
>
> Yes, and getting people to stop us
> "Sometimes you have to break things to make it better"
Yes, and getting people to stop using LibreSSL because it suddenly is
not interoperable with anything would surely help a lot.
Instead, we are trying to get developers to try and use LibreSSL
provided libtsl, which defaults to sane, strong
Hello again
On 27/02/15(Fri) 11:40, patrick keshishian wrote:
>
> I can confirm this change alone causes no adverse, observable
> change on my x120e's touchpad.
Could you guys confirm that the last fix from Ulf also fixes your issue?
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=142513927519879&w=2
Than
On Mar 04 17:57:22, czark...@gmail.com wrote:
> Jan Stary said:
> > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Wireless
> > lists the supported wireles chipsets, marking with NFF
> > those that need the non-free firmware to be downloaded.
> >
> > It does not mark iwn(4) as such,
>
> It should.
--- faq
"Sometimes you have to break things to make it better"
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Miod Vallat wrote:
> I think that's a win.
>>
>> What about PFS-only + HIGH ciphers?
>>
>
> What about interoperability? It is too early to restrict LibreSSL to
> PFS ciphersuites, alas.
>
> Miod
Marc Espie said:
> > I believe this is reported when $PKG_TMPDIR isn't writable.
>
> Definitely looks like somebody had fun with his /var/tmp <-> /tmp change... :p
Not me. I didn't even touch either directory neither before nor after
the breakage.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Jan Stary said:
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Wireless
> lists the supported wireles chipsets, marking with NFF
> those that need the non-free firmware to be downloaded.
>
> It does not mark iwn(4) as such,
It should.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 04:49:06PM +0100, Manuel Giraud wrote:
> Peter Hessler writes:
>
> > 1) lynx has some amazingly insecure code
> >
> > 2) the installer installs a functional pkg.conf if you installed from
> > the network.
>
> 3) nethack is not in base
At least parts of nethack is GPL.
On Mar 04 07:22:55, eagir...@cox.net wrote:
> I decided to upgrade the internal drive, so I hooked up the new on on
> the CD's usual SATA channel and installed, having adjust the disklabel
> more to suit me (the auto partition of /usr left it really tight on
> space, and home was not big enough).
>
>> I decided to upgrade the internal drive, so I hooked up the new on on
>> the CD's usual SATA channel and installed, having adjust the disklabel
>> more to suit me (the auto partition of /usr left it really tight on
>> space, and home was not big enough).
>>
>> First method: mount all the slices
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:06:57PM +0200, Lars Nooden wrote:
> The only other strange symptom is that the machine locks up hard every
> week or two requiring a powercycle or hardware reset to restart. I can
> find nothing in the logs anywhere near the time of the lock ups. The main
> board run
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> In the same manual, however, it reads:
>
> However, cp copies hard linked files as separate files. To
> preserve hard links, use a utility such as pax(1) or tar(1)
> instead.
>
> So using 'cp' to, effectively, mirror the disk, is not the bes
I think that's a win.
What about PFS-only + HIGH ciphers?
What about interoperability? It is too early to restrict LibreSSL to
PFS ciphersuites, alas.
Miod
I think that's a win.
What about PFS-only + HIGH ciphers?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> someone wrote:
>
> > Does LibreSSL supports RSA export-grade keys? - FREAK Attack
>
> Export ciphers were deleted from LibreSSL last summer.
Peter Hessler writes:
> 1) lynx has some amazingly insecure code
>
> 2) the installer installs a functional pkg.conf if you installed from
> the network.
3) nethack is not in base
--
Manuel Giraud
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:22:45PM GMT, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> rsync -avH will copy hard linked files, .. and is a much better option
> - especially if using a network connection [e.g. to the backup disk
> mounted on another machine].
Hi Lee,
I was meant to mention it but given the issues the OP
Ed Ahlsen-Girard writes:
> I decided to upgrade the internal drive, so I hooked up the new on on
> the CD's usual SATA channel and installed, having adjust the disklabel
> more to suit me (the auto partition of /usr left it really tight on
> space, and home was not big enough).
>
> First method:
someone wrote:
> Does LibreSSL supports RSA export-grade keys? - FREAK Attack
Export ciphers were deleted from LibreSSL last summer.
Hello,
---
Does LibreSSL supports RSA export-grade keys? - FREAK Attack
"Apple's SecureTransport and OpenSSL -- have a bug in them. This bug causes
them to accept RSA export-grade keys *even when the client didn't as
1) lynx has some amazingly insecure code
2) the installer installs a functional pkg.conf if you installed from
the network.
On 2015 Mar 04 (Wed) at 10:11:17 -0500 (-0500), Bob Eby wrote:
:Lynx is gone. Wow just wow, I'm stupefied by just how much you guys have
:removed from base.
:
:The least y
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:22:55PM GMT, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
> First method: mount all the slices in /tree and run a series of cp -R
> as root. Files seemed to get there but something was not right with
> permissions when I tried booting the new disk, so I dropped back and
> did some research.
Lynx is gone. Wow just wow, I'm stupefied by just how much you guys have
removed from base.
The least you could do is put something on afterboot useful to getting a
web browser up and running. Note: it's usually helpful to have a
web-browser to do things like oh, I don't know, find a suitable mi
I have an old Soekris 5501 with a wireless (WL-RT2561-ST 802.11a/b/g) PCI
card, running a recent snapshot. I have slow wireless transfer rate and
sluggishness that went from being occasional to nearly 100% of the time.
Instead of 830kB/s or so from the net, I'm getting transfer rates of
aroun
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
I decided to upgrade the internal drive, so I hooked up the new on on
the CD's usual SATA channel and installed, having adjust the disklabel
more to suit me (the auto partition of /usr left it really tight on
space, and home was not big enough).
First
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:39:05AM -0500 or thereabouts, Bob Eby wrote:
> I had tried this link:
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/hostname.if.5?query=hostname.if&sec=5
>
> Which seemed to say this would work:
>
> nwid mynwid
> wpakey mywpakey
> dhcp
>
> which does
The OpenBSD Foundation is pleased to announce that we have been
accepted as a mentoring organization for Google Summer of Code 2015.
As such if you are a student who qualifies to apply for GSOC, you will
be able to find us in Google's Summer of Code Application process.For
details on the applicatio
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:05:02AM -0500 or thereabouts, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 03/04/15 07:38, Bob Eby wrote:
> > I had tried this link:
> >
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/hostname.if.5?query=hostname.if&sec=5
> >
> > Which seemed to say this would work:
> >
>
Hello,
I run OpenBSD 5.6 as gateway for wireless networks. Interfaces:
em0 - link to switch with Ubiquiti APs that provide 4 SSIDs
vlan 2 - 10.10.12.0/24, SSID Guests
vlan 3 - 10.10.13.0/24, SSID Devs
vlan 4 - 10.10.14.0/24, SSID VPNs
(The last SSID is Internal in internal_nw_2 192.168.16
I decided to upgrade the internal drive, so I hooked up the new on on
the CD's usual SATA channel and installed, having adjust the disklabel
more to suit me (the auto partition of /usr left it really tight on
space, and home was not big enough).
First method: mount all the slices in /tree and run
On 03/04/15 07:38, Bob Eby wrote:
> I had tried this link:
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/hostname.if.5?query=hostname.if&sec=5
>
> Which seemed to say this would work:
>
> nwid mynwid
> wpakey mywpakey
> dhcp
>
> which doesn't work, what is up, unwiredbsd, rtso
I had tried this link:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/hostname.if.5?query=hostname.if&sec=5
Which seemed to say this would work:
nwid mynwid
wpakey mywpakey
dhcp
which doesn't work, what is up, unwiredbsd, rtsol etc?
Thanks,
Bob
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:39:51PM -0800, Jason Adams wrote:
> Somewhere along the road of moving from 5.5 to 5.6 (i386) my performance in X
> has really taken a hit
> when dragging windows around. The window trails the pointer by several
> inches. X performance used
> to be surprisingly good o
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015-03-01, Felipe Scarel wrote:
>> Now loading the "phishing/domains" URL list, which has about ~63k
>> entries. relayd's "parent" process ballons to over 2GB memory usage
>> (I'm assuming it's reading the URL lists and building a data
* Libertas [2015-01-02 06:25]:
> I've tuned PF parameters in the past, but it doesn't seem to be the
> issue. My current pfctl and netstat -m outputs suggest that there are
> more than enough available resources and no reported failures.
just a sidenote, it is safe to bump the default state limit
Thanks for all the useful comments :)
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Jiri B wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:16:11PM +0100, someone wrote:
> > If X security is so bad, how can one run a GUI app, ex.: Firefox without
> > it? Using framebuffer? How can then someone use a GUI password manager
Thanks for clarifying!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> On 03/03/15 10:55, Thisis theone wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Do you expect to run the X Window System? [yes] no
>> Do you want the X Window System to be started by xdm(1)? [no] no
>>
>> Isn't this a contradiction? Or is it
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:16:11PM +0100, someone wrote:
> If X security is so bad, how can one run a GUI app, ex.: Firefox without
> it? Using framebuffer? How can then someone use a GUI password manager to
> copy the pwd to the Firefox in the fb?
>
> google doesn't gives too many answers, to be
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:17:33PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
> wrote:
> > I've updated to March 1 snapshot, and after sysmerge tried to update
> > packages. What I got was:
> >
> > : $ sudo pkg_add -u
> > : Use of uninitialized value $fil
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 09:20:00AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:56:44PM +0100, Adam Wolk wrote:
> > > I just updated to the March 1 (i386) snapshot and now I'm in process of
> > > doing a 'pkg_add -uiv' so far no issues on my side (packages
On 2015-03-01, Felipe Scarel wrote:
> Now loading the "phishing/domains" URL list, which has about ~63k
> entries. relayd's "parent" process ballons to over 2GB memory usage
> (I'm assuming it's reading the URL lists and building a data structure
> for the relays),
Yes, it's building a red-black
On 2015-03-03, someone wrote:
> Wow, copying the .Xauthority to the "separated" user worked!
>
> But I'm still thinking that the "separated" user can give out the command:
>
> xinput test 6
>
> and can see what anyone types in via X.
See xauth(1) about generating an untrusted auth token. If you'r
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 06:21:52PM -0500, Bob Eby wrote:
>
> I'm trying to connect to a wireless network using OpenBSD 5.6. I see a
> couple FAQ questions talking about a "wpa-psk" command to convert plaintext
> to encrypted string, but still getting secure wireless working is about as
> clear as
On Mar 04 09:19:42, phess...@theapt.org wrote:
> And when you run "fw_update", does it fetch the correct firmware?
iwn-firmware-5.11p1 is what fw_update fetched.
Isn't it the correct one?
>
> On 2015 Mar 04 (Wed) at 08:26:16 +0100 (+0100), Jan Stary wrote:
> :http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html
And when you run "fw_update", does it fetch the correct firmware?
On 2015 Mar 04 (Wed) at 08:26:16 +0100 (+0100), Jan Stary wrote:
:http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Wireless
:lists the supported wireles chipsets, marking with NFF
:those that need the non-free firmware to be downloaded.
:
:It
79 matches
Mail list logo
