Hi,
I am using spamd on a current installation in greylisting mode,
and have have problems with large sites that have several
SMTP servers but no SPF ip-address ranges.
Sometimes I have more than 10 mail server IPs in the greylisted
in spamdb, from the same (friend) email address, and the the
sende
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:26:13AM +0200, Alex Greif wrote:
> I am using spamd on a current installation in greylisting mode,
> and have have problems with large sites that have several
> SMTP servers but no SPF ip-address ranges.
> Sometimes I have more than 10 mail server IPs in the greylisted
>
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:46:19AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:26:13AM +0200, Alex Greif wrote:
> > I am using spamd on a current installation in greylisting mode,
> > and have have problems with large sites that have several
> > SMTP servers but no SPF ip-addres
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:05:45AM +0200, Alex Greif wrote:
> But in some cases, the sender mail server tried so often from different
> SMTP IPs, and finally gave up with an error to the sender. Then the sender and
> receiver persons are quite unhappy, and a lot of time is vasted.
In most cases th
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:52:52AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:05:45AM +0200, Alex Greif wrote:
> > But in some cases, the sender mail server tried so often from different
> > SMTP IPs, and finally gave up with an error to the sender. Then the sender
> > and
> >
On Sun, 17 May 2015 14:29:07 - "Maurits Fennis" wrote:
> > just not the TTY's
>
> same here.
>
> --
> Maurits Fennis
>
> () ascii ribbon campaign
> /\ www.asciiribbon.org
>
here too. i just submitted a bug report "problems with console output".
Happy Birthday Theo.
Rod/
*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I subscribed to the list.
Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is
tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to
reply off list. Thankyou.
Rod/
---
This life is not the r
I've updated another machine today to latest snapshot and it is fixed.
Have you tried the 18th May (ftp3.eu) snapshot ?
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:51 PM, dan mclaughlin
wrote:
> On Sun, 17 May 2015 14:29:07 - "Maurits Fennis"
> wrote:
> > > just not the TTY's
> >
> > same here.
> >
> > --
On Mon, 18 May 2015 09:26:13 +0200
Alex Greif wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using spamd on a current installation in greylisting mode,
> and have have problems with large sites that have several
> SMTP servers but no SPF ip-address ranges.
> Sometimes I have more than 10 mail server IPs in the greylisted
>
On Mon, 18 May 2015 11:24:13 +0100 Pedro Tender
wrote:
> I've updated another machine today to latest snapshot and it is fixed.
> Have you tried the 18th May (ftp3.eu) snapshot ?
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:51 PM, dan mclaughlin
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 17 May 2015 14:29:07 - "Mauri
On 5/17/2015 11:13 PM, Michael McConville wrote:
Patch 002 applied and built cleanly, and patch 003 applied without
issue. However, I get the error shown below when I attempt to build
libcrypto for patch 003.
...
Has anyone else experienced this? Any ideas about what might be causing
it?
Y
On 2015-05-18 Mon 09:26 AM |, Alex Greif wrote:
>
> I am using spamd on a current installation in greylisting mode,
> and have have problems with large sites that have several
> SMTP servers but no SPF ip-address ranges.
Hi Alex,
Bumping up the spamd(8) greyexp time to 2-4 days works well (on 5.
I'm not having problems with ksh nor zsh, going in and out of X (xfce).
âTTY's working fine.â
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:56 PM, dan mclaughlin
wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2015 11:24:13 +0100 Pedro Tender
> wrote:
> > I've updated another machine today to latest snapshot and it is fixed.
> > Ha
Hello. I have upgraded my home server from OpenBSD 5.6 to 5.7. It is
amd64 and it is on -stable with -stable ports.
Everything is working fine after the upgrade except SSL in Apache2
(apache-httpd package/port).
I get the following error in the error_log when I try to start Apache2:
[Mon May
On Mon, 18 May 2015 14:21:39 +0100 Pedro Tender
wrote:
> I'm not having problems with ksh nor zsh, going in and out of X (xfce).
> âTTY's working fine.â
>
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:56 PM, dan mclaughlin
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 18 May 2015 11:24:13 +0100 Pedro Tender
> > wrote:
> > >
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 02:20:08PM +0100, Craig Skinner wrote:
Hi Craig,
yes, this should help, in the case that the sender tries longer
than 4 hours.
Are there any experiences, after how many hours/days the sender
side (at the large ones like google, yahoo, hotmail, etc)
gives up?
thanks,
Alex.
On Mon, 18 May 2015, Stefan Sperling wrote:
OTOH, many laptops nowadays ship with Intel AMT and suffer the same issue
or worse. Yet we still run on them. Current AMT versions have an attack
surface that dwarfs ASF's. Perhaps this is a lost cause and we'll simply
have to accept that a lot of hard
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:04:03AM -0400, John Merriam wrote:
> I get the following error in the error_log when I try to start Apache2:
>
> [Mon May 18 09:51:43 2015] [error] Failed to configure CA certificate
> chain!
>
> The certificate is a wildcard certificate from RapidSSL.
>
> I have thei
On Mon, 18 May 2015, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:04:03AM -0400, John Merriam wrote:
> > I get the following error in the error_log when I try to start Apache2:
> >
> > [Mon May 18 09:51:43 2015] [error] Failed to configure CA certificate
> > chain!
> >
> > The certificate
Hi Alex,
On 2015-05-18 Mon 16:37 PM |, Alex Greif wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 02:20:08PM +0100, Craig Skinner wrote:
>
> yes, this should help, in the case that the sender tries longer
> than 4 hours.
>
RFC 5321, in section "4.5.4.1. Sending Strategy" has:
...
..
Retries continu
Hi,
I've just switched my webserver from 5.6/nginx to 5.7/httpd and was
testing my TLS setup using SSL Labs[1]. The SSL Labs test indicates that
my setup doesn't support forward secrecy. Is this not implemented in
the 5.7 version of httpd or is my configuration wrong (included below)?
OS: OpenBSD
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:18:06AM -0400, Alan Corey wrote:
> I don't think it did this back in 5.0 days or maybe earlier. I started
> with OpenBSD 2.7, I just usually attributed problems to being my fault.
> And I've always used the ports tree, not packages. Distfiles are often
> useful across Op
> I've just switched my webserver from 5.6/nginx to 5.7/httpd and was
> testing my TLS setup using SSL Labs[1]. The SSL Labs test indicates
> that my setup doesn't support forward secrecy. Is this not implemented
> in the 5.7 version of httpd or is my configuration wrong (included
> below)?
In my
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:43:26PM +0200, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just switched my webserver from 5.6/nginx to 5.7/httpd and was
> testing my TLS setup using SSL Labs[1]. The SSL Labs test indicates that
> my setup doesn't support forward secrecy. Is this not implemented in
> the 5
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:43:26PM +0200, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just switched my webserver from 5.6/nginx to 5.7/httpd and was
>> testing my TLS setup using SSL Labs[1]. The SSL Labs test indicates
>> that my setup doesn't support forward secrecy. Is this not implemented
>> i
I'm not intimately familiar with the HTTP spec, but I'm having an issue
transferring a large file (2GB) from httpd.
Chrome starts streaming the file, but stops somewhere between 7-10 MB.
Using the debugger, it appears that the "Content-Length" header is
negative (-2095872469) in this case.
A quic
On Sun, May 17, 2015, at 08:08 AM, Peter Leber wrote:
> I want to build a test system based on OpenBSD 5.7 which updates
> in an automated fashion.
> The goal is to have a remotely located machine which runs OpenBSD 5.7
> and is constantly updated. While restarting the machine remotely via SSH
> is
On 17-05-2015 11:08, Peter Leber wrote:
> I recognize that there's m:tier's binary patching service
> (https://stable.mtier.org), but the packages are signed
> by m:tier rather than the OpenBSD project. While following m:tier's
> binary patches is a good compromise to me, it's not a perfect soluti
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:52:19PM +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> There are several things which this script does not check for - some of
> those are on my TODO list:
I didn't review your script, but I did ctrl+s...
TODO item #0 should be to use signify with SHA256.sig rather than
checking SHA256 di
29 matches
Mail list logo