hi
how do i configure a virtual switch to connect the interfaces of
several vm's together.
the interfaces will have fixed addresses and i will also be bridging
the interfaces to the host.
i know how to set up the bridge and then configure it with vm.conf
but i not sure how to setup the switc
On 2018-03-31, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> Setup another bugtracker which you like, connect it to bugs@ and send a
> link to this thread.
Please don't.
My suggestion of looking at bugs@ as a seed is for a *person* to read
new reports, collect information into one place, figure out if it
really is
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 09:47:18PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Jon Martin(jmg...@gmail.com) on 2018.03.22 13:19:51 -0600:
>>
>> To me this further indicates a "double authentication": a CHAP challenge
>> followed by PAP authentication. I have no idea how to set up a config
>> to answer that
Just curious, could it be, that the problem is only a problem of the
OPs from the threads (bug tracker, github mirror and so on) and, not a
problem from the OpenBSD developers ?
If I read the last section from https://www.openbsd.org/report.html it
looks like that for me. I did not search the list
Hello,
I have probably a trivial (user) question.
I've used texmacs on 6.1, amd64.
Now I wanted to install it on 6.2, i386, but I can
neither find a package nor i386 is mentioned
among Archs in ports (the same for amd64, btw.).
What can I do?
Why isn't i386 and amd64 available?
Thanks
Ruda
>The good news is that just PAP authentication should work, and does on
>Windows. The bad >news is that on OpenBSD I'm still not getting an IP address
>from Tek/Telus after the Authenticate-Ack.
I remember some time ago, that someone requested some help with pppoe
implementation since his ISP w
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:04:08AM +0100, niya wrote:
>
> > hi
> >
> > how do i configure a virtual switch to connect the interfaces of several
> > vm's together.
> > the interfaces will have fixed addresses and i will also be bridging the
> > interfaces to the host.
> > i know how to set up the
Hi Christoph,
Christoph R. Murauer wrote on Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 01:56:47PM +0200:
> not a problem from the OpenBSD developers ?
There *is* an actual problem: Some bug reports are not processed
immediately because at the time they are posted, nobody happens to
find the time to investigate. Lat
On Sun, Apr 01 2018, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have probably a trivial (user) question.
>
> I've used texmacs on 6.1, amd64.
> Now I wanted to install it on 6.2, i386, but I can
> neither find a package nor i386 is mentioned
> among Archs in ports (the same for amd64, btw.).
>From the M
Thanks for your fast answer.
I thought before, that the manual triage was the point.
Would the devs accept / use a bug tracker ? I ask because I find start
something without the devs is burning time (see the .ru domain, the UI
posts ... ).
If someone of the developers is interested a off list di
Hi there,
There are simple ways of relaying local mails(connection on lo0 on port 25) to
a other mailserver. This is oky for logs and stuff but what's about mails
created by a php on the local webserver? His do I get smtpd to still do a auth
with username and pwd on lo0? Is it possible or do
> Would the devs accept / use a bug tracker ? I ask because I find start
> something without the devs is burning time (see the .ru domain, the UI
> posts ... ).
We'd be happy to accept a bug-tracker which is slavishly quality-managed
and continually purified and kept current by a team of dedicated
My question was serious. I am not the enemy but I think this thing
will only work if the people who use it accept / like to use it and so
on.
> bug tracking software is 1% of the solution. At least 80% of the
work is triage, and noone on this thread is serious about doing
that.
Do we want the 1% solution? No.
Will we accept something which comes with a full triage team? Yes.
Is a triage team being offered? No.
> My question was serious. I am not the enemy but I think this thing
> will only work if the people who use it accept / like to use it and so
> on.
>
> > bug
Christoph, your conversation is distracting.
Nobody gives a damn about the tool. Everyone gives a damn about the triage.
I hate to break it to you, but you are not the first person to broach
this discusson.
The only way this would work is with a dedicated team of people to
triage each area and c
> No such team exists. the tool used is irrelevant
Well, we have that tool today: it is a mailing list.
Also, we have a team which triages bugs on there: the developers.
Is it perfect? No.
Do things slip through the cracks? Sure. Because not enough people
triage. Not enough developers.
Wo
I think the issue of triage deserves a more clear explanation of just
how huge a task this really is.
A team with members who are well familiar with each architecture and
having access to the actual models/devices showing the problem.
Even a "fix" might break other models within the same architect
Hello:
I'm trying to get chrome or firefox display Chinese characters but I'm
failing. I have installed zh-wqy-bitmapfont and zh-fonts-kc and then I
run
fc-cache but they do not show up. In the font menu of chrome I cannot
find any option for those fonts to be used. Firefox is fine though.
I also
On 11:01 Sun 01 Apr, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Please don't.
I wasn't going to. This guy jsut asked for the feedback so I wrote him.
Hello all,
I have tried to installed 6.1 and 6.2 on a thinkpad x200 it works but X does
work ...
Its works great with 6.0 but then i dont get the good 6.2 packages and features
such as syspatch.
It seems lika well known problem:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=150506076421862&w=2
Does
Thanks Bob, Theo, Chris for your detailed answers.
>From Ingos answer :
> ... Later on, when somebody would have time to look, such unprocessd
reports have low visibility because they are nothing but an old
posting on a mailing list, drowning in a lot of noise from invalid
and resolved reports.
Hello,
I have a script that mounts a partition and it works well except when the
partition needs to be fsck checked.How can I know if the partition needs to be
checked by fsck, I'd like to test that.If the partition needs to be checked by
fsck, I run fsck firstElse I mount the partition
Happy ea
On 2018-04-01, Mik J wrote:
> How can I know if the partition needs to be checked by fsck, I'd like to test
> that.
Check the output of dumpfs. clean=0 means that the filesystem is
dirty and fsck should be run.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
> > How can I know if the partition needs to be checked by fsck, I'd like to
> > test that.
>
> Check the output of dumpfs. clean=0 means that the filesystem is
> dirty and fsck should be run.
It is cheaper to just run fsck. If it has no work to do, it finishes.
Hello,
Thank you for your answers@Christian: The command takes 1s, and seem to work as
you said# dumpfs sd1c | grep clean
cgrotor 64 fmod 0 ronly 0 clean 0
@Theo: The fsck is not superfast, it takes 20s I end with that message39256
files, 5904368 used, 10865841 free (1534
25 matches
Mail list logo