On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 09:15:48PM -0700, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently installed OpenBSD 6.4 amd64 and radeondrm fails to load
> properly. I then installed OpenBSD 6.4 i386 on the same hardware (to a
> USB pendrive) and it works fine. Any ideas?
There are many ways of gett
I recently updated a couple servers that were running OpenBSD 6.3 with bind
9.11.3 to OpenBSD 6.4 and bind 9.11.4pl2. Since then, I'm been getting a large
number of "error sending response: would block" log messages:
Nov 15 11:03:58 lisa named[79587]: client @0x6f2f02bc440 10.128.30.77#65198
(p64
You're right, thanks.
I set it up this way as I noticed similar behaviour in some bigger
providers ...
- changed now back to meet 2487.
M>
On 11/16/18 6:43 PM, Penty Wenngren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:54:13PM +0100, Martin Sukany wrote:
Hello Craig,
I don't think so .. I'm just e
> > Does this mean that I should either build the packages from ports
> > myself, or use someone else's binary packages (e.g. those from
> > m:tier); no other options?
>
> Yes.
Thank you for the answer!
--
Best regards,
Ivan
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:54:13PM +0100, Martin Sukany wrote:
> Hello Craig,
>
> I don't think so .. I'm just enforcing encrypted communication ... :)
>
> {
>
> listen on vio0 port25 tls-require auth-optional pki sukany.cz
>
> }
>
> M>
RFC 2487:
A publicly-referenced SMTP server MUST NOT r
Amazing Readers,
In my syslog.conf I put ssllog.my.domain
when the computer start syslog is like : meeeh
your pppoe has not started yet :-( ; IE:
bad hostname @ssllog.my.domain
so I have to SIGHUP when network is actually ready.
Is there a common way to solve this ( I failed to find one in man
Hello Craig,
I don't think so .. I'm just enforcing encrypted communication ... :)
{
listen on vio0 port25 tls-require auth-optional pki sukany.cz
}
M>
On 11/16/18 4:50 PM, Craig Skinner wrote:
Martin, your mail server is badly configured (broken):-
Begin forwarded message:
From: mail
On 11/16/18 3:43 PM, Jarkko Oranen wrote:
> As far as I'm aware, they are/were originally separated largely due to
> historical reasons anyway, not because it's inherently better to keep
> them separate.
However they came about it is inherently better. Linux often takes the easy
rather than best r
Martin, your mail server is badly configured (broken):-
Begin forwarded message:
From: mailer-dae...@britvault.co.uk (Mail Delivery System)
To: skin...@britvault.co.uk
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:17:13 + (GMT)
This is the mail system at host tea
On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 18:55 +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> This kind of demonstrates Lennart Poeterings recent tweet/boast about
> unified
> /usr to actually be a bad idea likely taken up by Debian out of
> frustration and
> not desire/design.
>
Well, to be fair in Linuxland the separation bet
Hi,
after upgrading one of my bind (cache resolver) machines to 6.4 (release) I'm
getting these errors quite often:
Nov 16 15:55:14 server named[30616]: client: warning: client @0x6591da02440
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx#39702 (a1928.d.akamai.net): error sending response: would block
https://kb.isc.org/doc
Hello,
I recently installed OpenBSD 6.4 amd64 and radeondrm fails to load
properly. I then installed OpenBSD 6.4 i386 on the same hardware (to a
USB pendrive) and it works fine. Any ideas?
dmesg for both follow:
OpenBSD 6.4 (GENERIC.MP) #364: Thu Oct 11 13:30:23 MDT 2018
dera...@amd6
Well,
I figured out, that problem is in vacation itself, where is missing
proper control of recipient's address.
In case, the header of original message contains line like:
From:
vacation encloses the message by "<>", so SMTPD then receives sth like:
RCPT TO: <>
As a temporary hack,
On 11/15/18 9:53 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> well, it's not just time fsck'ing, those checks can fail, and then if
> you don't have OOB you have to go visit the machine ..
I assume sync doesn't solve that entirely?
On 11/16/18 10:06 AM, Daniel Polak wrote:
>>> The main benefit of read-only is not having to do disk checks but the time
>>> for
>>> root is negligible.
>> well, it's not just time fsck'ing, those checks can fail, and then if
>> you don't have OOB you have to go visit the machine ..
True, but the
These are values recommended by an application I want to install on my Openbsd
machine.
Since I have a hard time to make it work properly, I want to apply their
settings before thightening things
I'm still in test mode.
Le vendredi 16 novembre 2018 à 12:07:25 UTC+1, Otto Moerbeek
a écri
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:46:12AM +, Mik J wrote:
> Hello,
> Thank you to both of you.
> I had already changed openfiles-max=65536 in login.conf and
> kern.maxproc=16384 in sysctl.conf.
> Have a nice day
But why?
-Otto
>
> Le vendredi 16 novembre 2018 à 11:18:42 UTC+1, Otto
Hello,
Thank you to both of you.
I had already changed openfiles-max=65536 in login.conf and kern.maxproc=16384
in sysctl.conf.
Have a nice day
Le vendredi 16 novembre 2018 à 11:18:42 UTC+1, Otto Moerbeek
a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:55:23AM +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:55:23AM +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 11/16/18 10:24 AM, Mik J wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does anyone know how to change these values ?
> >
> > # sysctl kern.nprocs=52
> > sysctl: kern.nprocs: Operation not permitted
> > # sysctl kern.nfiles=575
> > sysctl: kern.
Stuart Henderson wrote on 15-11-2018 22:53:
On 2018-11-15, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
The main benefit of read-only is not having to do disk checks but the time for
root is negligible.
well, it's not just time fsck'ing, those checks can fail, and then if
you don't have OOB you have to go visit th
On 11/16/18 10:24 AM, Mik J wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know how to change these values ?
>
> # sysctl kern.nprocs=52
> sysctl: kern.nprocs: Operation not permitted
> # sysctl kern.nfiles=575
> sysctl: kern.nfiles: Operation not permitted
>
> Regards
>
See sysctl(2):
Second level
Hello,
Does anyone know how to change these values ?
# sysctl kern.nprocs=52
sysctl: kern.nprocs: Operation not permitted
# sysctl kern.nfiles=575
sysctl: kern.nfiles: Operation not permitted
Regards
22 matches
Mail list logo
