On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 05:14:38PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 3:08 PM Olivier Taïbi wrote:
>
> > It seems that non-interactive sh(1) (i.e. sh -c command or sh file)
> > ignores the TERM signal. I'm surprised, is this the intended behaviour?
> > The man page says that
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 3:08 PM Olivier Taïbi wrote:
> It seems that non-interactive sh(1) (i.e. sh -c command or sh file)
> ignores the TERM signal. I'm surprised, is this the intended behaviour?
> The man page says that interactive shells will ignore SIGTERM, but does
> not mention the non-inte
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:21:41PM -0800, Misc User wrote:
> I'd look for software that has bug bounties. I'd also look at the CVEs for
> each product and compare with the patch history. The delay between a flaw
> being reported versus patched is going to be a much better indicator than
Yes, tha
It seems that non-interactive sh(1) (i.e. sh -c command or sh file)
ignores the TERM signal. I'm surprised, is this the intended behaviour?
The man page says that interactive shells will ignore SIGTERM, but does
not mention the non-interactive case.
So, with 6.4 recently released, I just installed it rather than using
latest current - worked flawlessly - thank you.
ospfctl reload now picks up new interfaces added.
/S
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 at 13:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/09/29 13:36, Simen Stavdal wrote:
> > Thanks Stuart,
> >
>
On 11/22/2018 12:56 PM, Chris Bennett wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 09:55:35AM -0600, Boris Goldberg wrote:
Hello Chris,
There is something extremely weird going on around lately. People are
easily take offense where no offense where intended (and hard to find
anyway). Nick was just telling
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:24:55PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
>
> all on one server?
>
> And as someone who has run a number of mail servers for a number of
> companies ... don't. Just don't. Running your own mail server is a
> good way to accomplish nothing except wasting a lot of time and mak
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 09:55:35AM -0600, Boris Goldberg wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> There is something extremely weird going on around lately. People are
> easily take offense where no offense where intended (and hard to find
> anyway). Nick was just telling you that (in his expert opinion) you
>
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:50:38AM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On 11/20/18 4:43 PM, Chris Bennett wrote:
> > AMD? I have read about problems with non-CPU chips being compromised.
> > Another architecture? I have never used anything other than Intel/AMD.
>
> I can't comment on SUN etc. but AMD w
On 11/22/2018 6:13 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2018-11-22, Radek wrote:
Hello,
does anybody run OpenBSD 6.3/amd64 or 6.4/amd64 on SUPERMICRO X7SPA-HF D510?
Does it work well together?
I need to build a backup server (rsync only) with 2-3x 4TB HDD, 3U/4U Rack case
for better cooling. RAID i
On 1109 0832, Wayne Oliver wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just wanted to say thanks for the hard work, OpenBSD runs better than any
> other OS on my laptop.
> One thing that really stands out is suspend and resume, I have *never* had a
> Linux or Windows laptop do it properly.
>
> Obviously everything else
Hello Chris,
There is something extremely weird going on around lately. People are
easily take offense where no offense where intended (and hard to find
anyway). Nick was just telling you that (in his expert opinion) you
shouldn't worry much about "Meltdown, Spectre, insecure motherboard chips",
On 2018-11-22, Radek wrote:
> Hello,
> does anybody run OpenBSD 6.3/amd64 or 6.4/amd64 on SUPERMICRO X7SPA-HF D510?
> Does it work well together?
>
> I need to build a backup server (rsync only) with 2-3x 4TB HDD, 3U/4U Rack
> case for better cooling. RAID is not needed.
> It must be as silent
Thank you all, it worked!
Sorry for the trouble, i will search more next time.
El mié., 21 nov. 2018 a las 19:14, escribió:
> If you are using startx, it won't work anymore after 001 security fix.
> Please switch to using xenodm(1).
>
> There were a couple of discussions on this list about this
Hello,
does anybody run OpenBSD 6.3/amd64 or 6.4/amd64 on SUPERMICRO X7SPA-HF D510?
Does it work well together?
I need to build a backup server (rsync only) with 2-3x 4TB HDD, 3U/4U Rack case
for better cooling. RAID is not needed.
It must be as silent as possible. Low power consumption is als
On 11/22/18 9:24 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> in an attempt to update today from ftp.spline.de I've been kicked out
> after -current update with pkg_add -u complaining about wrong libc
> versions. Packages complains like:
Likely you have a snapshot or packages out of sync. The packages take a lot
lon
On 11/21/18 4:00 PM, Gerhard Schweiger wrote on bugs@:
> Then comes in openbsd 6.1 amd64, and now the same huge speed difference
> between with or without encryption as found on OpenBSD 6.4.Is there any
> tweak I could test or is this just bad luck on my VPS or something else?
> Speed goes down so
On 11/20/18 4:43 PM, Chris Bennett wrote:
> AMD? I have read about problems with non-CPU chips being compromised.
> Another architecture? I have never used anything other than Intel/AMD.
I can't comment on SUN etc. but AMD would be the way to go if you can.
Theo has said in a recent presentation
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 05:37:05PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> First time you need to
>
> stty com0
> set tty com0
>
> then you can boot.
>
> The installer will remember this for next time, but our kernel does not
> know the speed so early on.
That was it! Excellent:
boot> stty com0 38400
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:24:02AM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> in an attempt to update today from ftp.spline.de I've been kicked out
> after -current update with pkg_add -u complaining about wrong libc
> versions. Packages complains like:
>
> Can't install png-1.6.35 because of li
Hello,
in an attempt to update today from ftp.spline.de I've been kicked out
after -current update with pkg_add -u complaining about wrong libc
versions. Packages complains like:
Can't install png-1.6.35 because of libraries
|library c.92.8 not found
| /usr/lib/libc.so.92.6 (system): minor is t
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 06:12:55PM -0600, Manuel Solis wrote:
> Hello Misc.
>
> I have installed 64 in a macbook and it works great and out of the box,
> however i notice that after i run syspatch and reboot, xorg doesn´t start
> at all.
>
Until this problem is fixed, Xorg must be started by roo
22 matches
Mail list logo
