Interjecting.
About 80 people are building & maintaining an operating system, and
following their whims to fix the problems that they believe to be most
relevant.
What is this email exchange about? Let me lay it out.
1. We are being told what to do.
2. We are being told what is important.
3.
On Wed, 8 May 2019 22:43:00 -0400
Charles wrote:
> I'd like to chime in here, on a slightly different subject.
>
> I think the OP (Clark) raises a point, but I suggest he's coming it
> from the wrong angle. I think there's something here to discuss that I
> have not seen mentioned in this
Don’t.
Generally, these things should be used to alert if an internal service has
been compromised (akin to using Canary Tokens), and the key copied. It is,
at best, a way to hear someone knocking.
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 15:59 Stefan R. Filipek wrote:
> There's a blog post going around that
I have a script[1] which I run when "things change" to keep openbsd
syzbot current. Something changed between Apr 2 and now that made my
install procedure no longer execute install.site which I pack into
siteXX.tgz. I checked that siteXX is making it into the iso image that
I use for installation
I'd like to chime in here, on a slightly different subject.
I think the OP (Clark) raises a point, but I suggest he's coming it
from the wrong angle. I think there's something here to discuss that I
have not seen mentioned in this thread thus far.
TL;DR: the OpenBSD (and friends) way of thinking
There's a blog post going around that has an interesting use of SSH
authorized_keys restrict + command:
https://kulinacs.com/ssh-honey-keys/
If you don't want to follow the link, it basically uses the
well-documented authorized_keys feature to restrict a login for an ssh
key to invoking a single
noah pugsley writes:
> Updated FVWM or a different default config?
>
> Sent from mobile.
> Original Message
> From: Christopher Turkel
> Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 04:22
> Cc: OpenBSD Misc
> Subject: Re: When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?
>
> I'd like to see an
I'm in favor of an updated FVWM with a simple config.
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 5:43 PM Matthew Graybosch
wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2019, at 5:18 PM, Roderick wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 8 May 2019, noah pugsley wrote:
> >
> > > Updated FVWM or a different default config?
> >
> > I hope, no one comes to
On Wed, May 8, 2019, at 5:18 PM, Roderick wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 May 2019, noah pugsley wrote:
>
> > Updated FVWM or a different default config?
>
> I hope, no one comes to the idea to change the configuration.
I'm not really fussed about the default FVWM config; it's easy enough to pull a
copy
On Wed, 8 May 2019, noah pugsley wrote:
Updated FVWM or a different default config?
I hope, no one comes to the idea to change the configuration.
In FreeBSD fvwm is awful configurated and I do not want to waste my time
configurating it. That is why I use there twm (easy to configure).
Updated FVWM or a different default config?
Sent from mobile.
Original Message
From: Christopher Turkel
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 04:22
Cc: OpenBSD Misc
Subject: Re: When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?
I'd like to see an updated FVWM as the default WM.
On Wed,
If you do that, you'd better crank way up on its fonts. Fvwm fonts
are so small that if you have bad vision, you can't read the screen
well enough to increase the font size.
It's easy for a well-sighted person to reduce fonts, but for the poorly
sighted person who can't read the screen in the
Greg Steuck(g...@nest.cx) on 2019.05.07 19:23:03 -0700:
> This is presumably already fixed by "Sync after libc++ bump", but in case
> somebody else hits it...
>
> The amd64 snapshot with this signature:
>
On Wed, May 8, 2019, at 03:59, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
>
> On 07.05.19 11:39, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> > I've got some more info on this.
> >
> > tried to run X with tiling wms: spectrwm (my main wm), dwm, i3 - all
> > hang absolutely the same way. (see my last mail with X backtraced)
> >
> >
On Wed, May 8, 2019, at 7:38 AM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?
>
> I think it is important to keep in mind that in order to achieve
> *anything* in the OpenBSD project (or other open source projects for
> that matter) the way forward
On Wed, 8 May 2019, ropers wrote:
Tangentially related: Does anyone here routinely use the default fvwm?
Yes, routinely default fvwm, also twm, and nothing else. Not only
with OpenBSD.
Rodrigo
I love the default minimalism, simplicity and freedom of OpenBSD to make it
how I want it.
My "Perfect OpenBSD": spectrwm, dmenu, urxvt (with perl tabbing), tmux, etc.
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 7:40 AM Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?
>
>
> When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?
I think it is important to keep in mind that in order to achieve
*anything* in the OpenBSD project (or other open source projects for
that matter) the way forward is to work *with*, not against, the
developers and their code.
The
I'd like to see an updated FVWM as the default WM.
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 7:18 AM Mohamed Fouad <
mohamed.ahmed.fouad@gmail.com> wrote:
> if you are suggesting updating the openbsd installer to include dwm as an
> option. Even that it adds one more click to the installation process, it
>
if you are suggesting updating the openbsd installer to include dwm as an
option. Even that it adds one more click to the installation process, it
would work as a sharm for some people :P
On Tue, 7 May 2019, 2:04 am Clark Block In 2019 still there is not a great desktop experience for NetBSD.
On 08/05/2019, noah pugsley wrote:
> You know, I guess it's just personal convention from habit. I think I
> started doing that way back before I could remember how the redirects work
> without looking them up. Too lazy to change now.
>
> So yeah, if you're trying to divine something clever
On 07.05.19 11:39, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
I've got some more info on this.
tried to run X with tiling wms: spectrwm (my main wm), dwm, i3 - all
hang absolutely the same way. (see my last mail with X backtraced)
then I've tried fvwm - works
cwm - works
kde & gnome - both work flawlessly.
On 2019-05-07, Steve Litt wrote:
On Tue, 07 May 2019 14:47:15 -0500
Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
I use dwm on everything so my desktop experience is the same
everywhere.
Just the man I want to talk to.
Do you have dmenu running on OpenBSD? Did you need to make adjustments
for ksh instead of sh
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 08:15:16PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
On 5/7/19 8:32 AM, Dumitru Moldovan wrote:
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 05:05:11PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi,
Consus wrote on Fri, May 03, 2019 at 02:24:10PM +0300:
Maybe it's a good idea to note this on the upgrade page?
On 02:01 Tue 07 May, Clark Block wrote:
> When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?
After binary package updates will be out-of-box, without using
third-party M:Tier.
25 matches
Mail list logo
