Re: OpenBSD support for Lenovo ThinkPad X230?

2012-11-23 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
On 23 Nov 2012, at 03:13, Byron Klippert wrote: > I picked up one recently; went with the following options. > > - Intel Core i5-3360M > - 128GB SSD (SATA3) > - 8GB PC3-12800 DDR3 > - Intel Centrino WL-N 2200 > > > > Had to use the Nov. 3 snapshot to take advantage of the recent ivy > bridge

Re: [Xen-users] obsd as dom0?

2010-01-11 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
On 11 Jan 2010, at 08:34, Pasi Kdrkkdinen wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:28:02PM +0100, Vadkan Jozsef wrote: >> Is it possible? >> > > I assume you mean openbsd? > > I don't think openbsd has Xen dom0 capable kernel available. > You might want to ask openbsd developers about it. No, it doesn

Re: Sendmail Locking Up System

2009-10-07 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
On 7 Oct 2009, at 17:25, Philip Guenther wrote: On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Chris wrote: I just reinstalled 4.5. I touched nothing on the system. I installed mutt through pkg_add, then created a 1M empty file from /dev/null. I sent this email to myself thusly: mutt -a 1megfile m...@

Re: New lynx in base

2009-06-24 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
If you update just your /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/lynx to -current in a 4.5- stable tree, it should compile (make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper clean obj all install) on a 4.5 system and install Lynx. Dont forget to copy the lynx.cfg into /etc. Completely untested though; your safest bet is to upgrade

Re: About the OpenBSD repository

2009-06-23 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
On 23 Jun 2009, at 13:17, Hannah Schroeter wrote: Hi! On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:16:12PM +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: Pretty much every single new revision control system can import/ export from CVS, so use whatever you want... I tried git cvsimport on OpenBSD's tree and it failed,

Re: About the OpenBSD repository

2009-06-22 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
Pretty much every single new revision control system can import/export from CVS, so use whatever you want... -anil On 22 Jun 2009, at 19:44, Fernando Quintero wrote: Hello list, I have a question: I was reading about version control systems and i found a lot of the distributed software "wi

Re: no ocamlopt in openbsd?

2008-12-04 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
The sparc64 port of OCaml doesnt include a native code backend, just the bytecode. However, you never *must* have ocamlopt in order to run an OCaml program, as the bytecode backend works fine (but a little slower) in most cases. If there's an option in the texvc package to swap out ocamlop

Re: OpenBSD as Xen domU

2008-02-09 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
On 8 Feb 2008, at 14:23, NetOne - Doichin Dokov wrote: Yup, I have successfully compiled the XENU kernel, I neither now which version it is, but it's 8 months old, I believe it was based on -current. The bad thing is that - when I try to run it with Xen, i get this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xen]# xm

Re: Do you virtualize w/OpenBSD as host?

2007-01-23 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
On 23 Jan 2007, at 05:22, Jason George wrote: On 1/22/07, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Finally, while OpenBSD does not run many virtualization environments, it does run *in* most virtualization environments. At least VMWare should work, and Xen is being developed [1].

Re: Xen/OpenBSD Summer of Code project

2006-06-04 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
device drivers (not Xen), so you can't just strip it down that much. The guest domain kernels are tiny however, as they only need virtual device drivers for block/network storage. The eventual plan is to get dom0 support in OpenBSD; we'll see how long it takes. -- Anil Madhavapeddy

Xen/OpenBSD Summer of Code project

2006-05-03 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
etBSD code already exists, and will be useful. -- Anil Madhavapeddy http://anil.recoil.org XenSource http://www.xensource.com

Re: any functional test suites to test socket API calls on openbsd

2005-09-19 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:34, Satya Nemana wrote: I cann't imagine, it is so hard to get something that looks so obviously needed and that too, such a standard one like socket API. If it is totally a new functional API, I can understand if it is not available so easy. The semantics of those APIs a

Re: Problems with CPU/ARCH specific compilation!?

2005-06-01 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
On 31 May 2005, at 16:17, Markus Kolb wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, May 31, 2005 at 15:13:50 +0200: Markus Kolb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The OpenBSD mailing lists are for dicussing OpenBSD issues. It has been repeatedly stated that fiddling with compiler flags is something that is

Re: Rant: how stupid does java look

2005-05-25 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
t; functional languages. Why? OCaml isnt a functional language, its a language which supports higher-order functions. And its native-code performance beats the living daylights out of any C# implementation I've seen. But really, who cares? They both work on OpenBSD, pick o

Re: some questions about OpenBSDs future plans

2005-05-09 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
> > How long do we/you have to wait till TenDRA can be used? > > Tendra is, unfortunately, not that interesting. > Yeah, Tendra's pretty dead. I'd wager it would be to easier to glue a register allocator onto /usr/ports/devel/cil and have a nice clean start. -- Anil M