On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 00:06 +, Danial wrote:
> I don't like responding to my own thread but I really need
> help with this one, so I'll try to rephrase the question:
Just about every userland utility has the ability to specify source
transmit addresses (bind(4) function)
If not, we can add it
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 13:59 +0200, Miod Vallat wrote:
> Until the cd-rom are actually created and the release is announced,
> tags are
Just trying to be helpful in reporting a build-problem during the releng
cycle.
If there's a better venue for such reports, lets have it :)
~BAS
IMPORTANT: T
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 12:36 -0400, Dan Brosemer wrote:
> But should you need to stop and start it, just kill off the [sn]mbd
> processes and fire them off manually.
Use /etc/rc.local as your command line flag/switch reference point.
~BAS
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential informati
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 13:29 +0100, Joerg Zinke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for hardware to install an openbsd based dsl-router.
> I already searched the list archives and looked at WRAP and Soekris,
> but it seems that they do not match my requirements:
>
> - fanless
> - as small as possible
-
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 13:46 -0800, Jon wrote:
> on some learning paths here. This mailing list is awesome. Thank you.
just remember that when 4.3 CD pre-release-sales are announced :)
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 12:15 -0800, Jon wrote:
> I'm using dd to clone a drive. How can I watch the progress of this or
> see the transfer rate in real time?
It should accept SIGINFO (control+G) on most terminals.
You may also be able to compile progress(1)
~BAS
IMPORTANT: This message cont
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 11:49 -0200, John Nietzsche wrote:
> Dear gentleman,
>
> i am starting with vlan topic right now. I am in need to get two dell
> powerconnect 2724 switches to implement 3 vlan. I know how to
The Dee PC2724 cant move its mgmnt vlan from VLAN1, and *BSD vlan(1)
wont transmit V
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 19:08 -0500, tim wrote:
> my current pf configuration and add the use of the IPSEC bridge to
> that set up.
Just check "tcpdump -vvv -n -s 192 -i pflog0". Probably "pass quick
proto ipencap all" etc.
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 01:14 -0800, Jake Conk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have pfsync setup between two servers and they're connected to each
The command that you're look for is:
$ sudo netstat -s state | grep -A 17 pfsync
pfsync:
0 packets received (IPv4)
0 packets received (IPv6)
> I have cut and pasted the output from ifconfig and dmesg below.
> I do have a non tulip nic I might try tomorrow.
Try a -current kernel. If it occurs, obtain a backtrace / kernel core
dump and post it. Possibly file a PR if it is warranted. It might not
get fixed quickly, so grab an xl(4)/fxp
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 14:17 -0200, Kleber Rocha wrote:
> 10.1.1.78 tries to access the ip 10.1.100.210 on port 8080, the
If xl0 faces 10.1.1.0 (outside) and bge0 faces your local (inside)
10.1.100.0/24, then your "pass in" statement will create a state
associated with inbound traffic.
However, it
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 07:23 +0100, Martin Toft wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 01:29:05AM +0100, Cabillot Julien wrote:
> > Have you try openbsd 4.2 ? PF have been really improved in this
> > release.
pf(4) has nothing to do with isakmpd(8), except as it relates to recent
addition of routing tags
> Ok, just tried rebooting with your suggestion of:
>
> boot -c
> disable fdc*
> boot
>
> Actually, I had to "quit" instead of "boot"
>
> It stopped at the same place: fd0 at fdc0 drive 0: 1.44MB 80cyl, 2 head, 18
> sec
Enable "verbose" in ukc. It often shows silent probes that fail and
lock
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:49 -0500, Peter Fraser wrote:
> get updates on the virus signatures. I was going to put
Well how many local patches are there? Did you try to bump the port to
the version you want? Just update the Makefile & distinfo and see if the
patches apply cleanly.
~BAS
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 00:42 +0300, VP wrote:
> >> It can be SPARC or x86.
> >> But vendors don't officially support OpenBSD with their hardware.
> >> We need tower server with 1 proccessor, 2 gigs of RAM, 2 SCSI disks
> >> and 2 power supply. Does anyone recommend brand server which supports
>
> >
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 20:21 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/11/02 14:45, Jason Murray wrote:
> > I have a 4.1 box that uses RAIDFrame so I need to compile a customer kernel
> > in order to upgrade. I know this is not supported, but it has worked (minus
> > the one gotcha) for me from 3.6
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 00:20 +0300, VP wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have a network with 100 users and 7 servers and current firewall
> need to be replaced. I want to by brand server due to company policy.
"Brand" as in put your company name on the hardware
> It can be SPARC or x86.
> But vendors don't o
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 14:51 +, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> And still one thing
>
> When I was try OpenBSD (I think that was 3.8),I use WindowMaker,Xmms and lots
Some *BSD systems are adjusting PCM driver support to allow multiple
process to open /dev/dsp / /dev/audio multiple times in-exclusively,
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:50 +0200, Dominik Zalewski wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have a machine with two Maxtor 160GB hard disks. I've installed OpenBSD 4.2
> on first one and I would like to use second one as a mirror.
If you really want to kick as the dead horse, I can probably roll a 4.2
install
> > first try to enable acpi and see what happens.
> >
>
> Thanks. Enabling acpi did not make a difference, but then I disabled
> apm and it's working.
Right -- all of the example ukc> output shows how to enable acpi0 but no
one ever shows how to disable apm0.
~BAS
>
> Abdul
>
> > HTH,
>
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 12:04 +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-22 08:17]:
> > Fragment Reassembly does not happen in the forwarding plane, it happens on
> > the end system. By doing "flow" based forwarding on the router you're no
> > longer able to do all th
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 14:39 -0700, Don Jackson wrote:
> no channels at
> tached
Well, "no channels attached" tells me its a hardware issue
(cables`n`shit), or the software failing to properly probe the hardware.
Does it work in another system under another platform (Linux LiveCD,
etc.).
I
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 01:42 -0700, Reza Muhammad wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just recently purchased a brand new HP Pavilion
> G3035L Desktop PC (spec:
> http://www.anugrahpratama.com/product/21/1092/HP-Pavilion-G3035L-Desktop-PC).
> It's using Intel Core Duo processor. I tried to
> install OpenBSD's
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 00:12 +0100, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> On 10/21/07, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll throw this out there since its been something on my mind for a
while:
Hardware VLAN tagging, TOE offload, IP/UDP/TCP Checksum offload,
interface polling are all ways to accelerate
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 09:35 +0200, Mitja MuE>eniD
wrote:
> This is the correct behaviour, as ipsec tunnel selection happens earlier in
> the process than route selection, the traffic for 192.168.64.0/24 enters the
> tunnel because it matches the remote subnet 192.168.0.0/16.
>
> Use this on the
25 matches
Mail list logo
