To me it looks like a mistimed April Fools' joke, but hope somebody more
knowledgeable will respond:
https://kingcope.wordpress.com/2015/07/16/openssh-keyboard-interactive-authentication-brute-force-vulnerability-maxauthtries-bypass/
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:06:44AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Emilio Perea [epe...@walkereng.com] wrote:
> > When using the latest snapshot, some ssh clients are unable to connect.
> > I don't know whether this is due to a problem with the client or the
> > server,
When using the latest snapshot, some ssh clients are unable to connect.
I don't know whether this is due to a problem with the client or the
server, but hope someone can point me in the right direction. If it is a
server problem, I will of course send a proper bug report.
I first noticed the probl
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:25:08AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 11:56:28PM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > >
> > > Afacit, it does build. What error are you getting ?
> >
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:58:55PM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
> > I am very grateful for the effort the developers put into the snapshots,
> > so I don't mean this as criticism. But it is possible for some
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:44:35AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> A lot of effort is expended trying to get snapshots out quickly after
> toolchain changes, precisely to make things easy for people. Even if
> you think you can figure out building from the source, the polite
> thing to do is to use th
Sorry, that should have been addressed to ports@
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 03:56:20PM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
> I have usually had both g77 and g95 ports installed in i386 and amd64
> PCs, but the last batch of -current ports fails with this message:
>
> # pkg_add -ui
> [gc
I have usually had both g77 and g95 ports installed in i386 and amd64
PCs, but the last batch of -current ports fails with this message:
# pkg_add -ui
[gcc-3.3.6p5v0]gcc-4.6.3p9: internal conflict between gcc-4.6.3p9 and
gcc-3.3.6p5v0
Can't install g95-4.6.3p4->g95-4.6.3p9: can't resolve gcc-4.6.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:21:58AM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Manuel Giraud wrote:
> >
> > I've just tried to update and it seems that the current
> > snapshots/i386/base51.tgz doesn't contains /usr/lib/libc.so.64.1
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Manuel Giraud wrote:
>
> I've just tried to update and it seems that the current
> snapshots/i386/base51.tgz doesn't contains /usr/lib/libc.so.64.1. If
> that's to be expected following -current, i'll wait a couple of day
> before re-update.
>
There does
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:21:33AM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
> Since installing yesterday's snapshot on amd64:
>
> OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #111: Wed May 11 10:41:28 MDT 2011
> t...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
> I lost the a
Since installing yesterday's snapshot on amd64:
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #111: Wed May 11 10:41:28 MDT 2011
t...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
I lost the ability to login to sshd using publickey:
$ ssh hermes
Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-intera
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 05:30:40PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> I noticed a thread where someone had problems compiling dnscurve
> (nacl) on OpenBSD.
>
> "http://old.nabble.com/dnscurve-updates-td24333543.html";
>
> Has anyone ran dnscurve on OpenBSD?
I believe Matthew Dempsky was working on
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Markus Hennecke wrote:
> So I am not the only one... The breakage happens with the commits
> that introduce scsi_xs_sync (rev. 1.150 from src/sys/scsi/scsi_base.c
> etc.). If I check out the files in the scsi directory from before
> that commit the kernel b
There seems to be a problem with CVSync updates (at least
anoncvs1.usa.openbsd.org and anoncvs3.usa.openbsd.org). I believe this
started about the time a large number of changes to gcc were made.
After updating the tree with csup, run cvsync:
- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon -
Date
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> Sadly, I have never seen any multi-sector PIO card.
> And obviuosly, I will be upgrading soon (ALICes, actually).
> Can people recommend some quality multi-sector PIO CF cards?
I've had excellent results with SanDisk cards. This one is
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:28:52PM +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
> I have installed openbsd on a 2 gb cf card. Is there a way to update
> my system and install all patches for my release using binaries? I
> have no free space to recompile the system from sources, still i would
> like to do an u
Possibly a dumb question, but...
What are the proper [ownership and] permissions for /var/spool/lpd/?
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:04:58PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Emilio Perea wrote:
> > There have been some changes to the default /root/.login recently that I
> > don't understand, and hope someone can enlighten me.
> >
> > On
There have been some changes to the default /root/.login recently that I
don't understand, and hope someone can enlighten me.
On my oldest server, the root shell is still csh, so the change is very
noticeable: Using the /root/.login from the 4.5 CD, when I login there
is a terminal type prompt wh
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 04:31:51PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Apr 16 09:59:29, Stuart VanZee wrote:
> > I've read the man page
>
> No you haven't:
>
> wraplen, wl [0]
>vi only. Break lines automatically, the specified number of
>columns from the left-hand margin.
4.5 is on the way!
- Forwarded message from OpenBSD Shipping
-
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:14:41 -0700 (MST)
From: OpenBSD Shipping
To: /home/shipping/mail/shipc...@qubit.computershop.ca,
epe...@walkereng.com
Subject: USPS OpenBSD Order:2009/3/5-22:5:56-7333:
USPS tracking numb
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:11:33PM -0300, Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote:
> Really?
>
> So http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html is wrong?
No, but you are not reading the whole thing. See this note:
(*) Support for devices marked with (*) is not included on the
distribution media or in the GENERIC k
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:12:52AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> the key is not to have coffee (or anything that is claimed to be
> coffee) in mouth when reading these ridiculous statements
Black "coffee" is not too bad, but Coca Cola Classic makes a really
sticky mess in your laptop.
Tip: if yo
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:46:16PM +0200, turha turha wrote:
> Hey,
>
> There might be something I'm missing, but I was unable to get the list of
> known FTP servers during the installation.
>
> I used the cd44.iso, and everything else went fine, except where it asks if
> I want a list of FTP ser
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 03:38:11PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> May be, you should run current and there is yet an other fresh commit
> on the subject just done a few minutes ago: "clau...@cvs.openbsd.org
> 2009/02/18 13:30:36"
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=123498913126874&w=2
Daniel,
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:05:13PM +1300, Richard Toohey wrote:
> On 9/02/2009, at 6:31 PM, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>
>> I think this could use some explaining for those of us that are not
>> intimately involved in development or have been around here for that
>> long. Keeping it small and simple by s
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:19:45AM -0600, Brian Drain wrote:
> So I am curious, what IS the best way to stay up to date? Is manually
> checking the errata page every day really correct (seems like there
> would be an automated solutuion such as the lynx dump aforementioned)?
> It seems to me that
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:36:10PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Emilio Perea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I received the "Welcome to the security-announce mailing list!"
> > message on 9/4/2002 and nothing since. I don
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 06:57:19PM +0100, Peer Janssen wrote:
> I subscribed to security-announce a long time ago and thought I would
> receive information about security annoucements, but contrary to what
> is stated on http://openbsd.org/mail.html:
>
> "security-announce - Security announcement
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:10:40AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> You missed the part lower down in Stephane's email (read down past
> the dmesg), showing exactly what's happening in the source code and
> why changing "flags" does not have an effect.
Not to mention the other two replies... S
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 06:11:07PM +0900, Stephane Lapie wrote:
> I am currently working with a Portwell NAR-5530 (network appliance running
> off Intel hardware, can use regular HDs or CF cards as boot device).
>
> We want to use this at work for network appliances, but end up bumping in
> the f
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 01:34:58PM -0600, Anathae Townsend wrote:
> Just an fyi. I am unable to install a package as the libs installed by the
> iso are older than the libs required by the package.
That seems strange, since the last packages I see are dated Aug 13 and
the current install sets are
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 04:48:04AM +0200, Jesus Sanchez wrote:
> can I compile a 4.3 source tree with also xenocara on a
> 4.2 installation??
No. Why would you want to? Do a binary upgrade and then either patch
or compile the stable tree.
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 03:33:26PM -0500, pezking wrote:
>
> Thanks for the fast replies guys. I'll try your suggestion Emilio, just to
> make sure, for the "tag" option in my supfile, do I just do "." as I would
> with FreeBSD to get the current release?
Yes, but as Dorian noted, that is the 4.4-
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 10:26:54PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
>
> OpenBSD 4.4-beta (GENERIC) #1011: Sat Aug 2 21:46:49 MDT 2008 (the
> latest and greatest from ftp.openbsd.org) boots fine.
Yes, that fixed the problem. (I was not able to try bsd.rd on my 4801
since I seem to have screwed up my
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 02:54:17PM -0500, pezking wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is my first OpenBSD mailing list post so I hope I am in the correct
> place, and if I am not I apologize in advance. I'm having some trouble
> upgrading from OpenBSD 4.2 to 4.3 - particularly at the "config GENERIC"
> stage
This build seems to go into an endless reboot cycle, rebooting before
anything shows up in the console of a Soekris net4801. The previous
snapshot (build #1004) works fine. Unfortunately I have nothing to show
for it as far as filing a proper bug report. BIOS screen followed by
the changing cons
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:52:51PM -0700, Bryan wrote:
>
> After I rebooted, the following came up when the server attempted to
> create the SSH keys (RSA, RSA1, DSA):
>
> ssh-keygen: generating new DSA host key... /usr/b
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:19:27AM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
>> maybe if people actually READ THE ARCHIVES, they'd be better
>> informed. i wish this mailing list had
>
> I didn't want to rehash it all again. Everyone knows the issues.
>
> How
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:01:57PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
>
> The demise of his qmail is a wonderful example of interesting project which
> died because of the bad "licence". I know that lots of people here like his
> djbdns but just imagine what could have happened with his projects if
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:48:10PM +0300, Timo Myyr? wrote:
> I was trying to install 4.3 to a SanDisk 1GB CF disk but the installer
> aborts when it tries to create the partitions to the disk
>
> I get following when the creating partitions:
> pciide:0:0:0: timeout waiting for DRQ, st=0x51 , err=
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 09:37:10AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Maybe this has something to do with it :
>
> --
> From: Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 23:3
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 08:47:06AM +0300, Denis Doroshenko wrote:
> dhcpd seems to be being intensively worked on. there is some new stuff
> in the tree to sync several dhcpd or something. perhaps you might want
> to look for CVS log messages for dhcpd sources and update the tree
> more frequently,
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:52:57PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> Just came home to find virtually all my machines had fallen off the
> network with the same problem. Restarting dhcpd seems to have it run
> just long enough to answer one query, then it dies quietly.
>
> For the moment, might want t
I have been running amd64 GENERIC.MP -current on my home server for a
about 2-1/2 years. Two or three days ago dhcpd started dying without
any error message. Since I see that there have been quite a few changes
in the last few days, it is possible that this is a known problem that
is being worked
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:46:33AM +1000, Rich Healey wrote:
> for the record, it's VERY broken in Vista.
>
> running "edit" in cmd or powershell, gives,
>
> |===
> |16 bit MS-DS Subsytem |x|
> |===
> |
> |Windows PowerShel
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 08:03:18AM +0930, Damon McMahon wrote:
>
> I avoided the 4.1->4.2 upgrade due to the libexpat issue - using
> several packages which use libexpat and not wanting to install xbase
> on my system. I have read through upgrade43.html and just want to make
> sure that I can up
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:04:34PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
>
> HOWEVER, the 80386sx was a non-starter for a long time: these machines
> only had 24 bit address buses, so it had a max of 16M, and being they
> were "cheap" machines, the actual potential of most of the hardware
> they were used in
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:56:41PM -0500, Rafael Morales wrote:
> Please someone help me I have deleted my /etc dir (rm
> -rf /etc), is there any way to recover it, or there is
> a way to recover my data stored in /home ???
For /etc look in /var/backups/ (for /home you're on your own).
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 12:59:39AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> Could somebody please explain about "Running Strings"?
The usual explanation is "man strings". But for example:
*--*
artemis:~
{20} % strings /dev/fs/C/WINDOWS/syst
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:49:56PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
> But, as I understand the issue, this is _not_ part of his specified
> punishment -- it's just a side-effect of the manner in which the
> government wants to impose a portion of his punishment. There appears
> to be no real reason for
I just noticed that after a csup update from rt.fm xenocara is gone and
src is getting there. Current df vs this morning's daily output:
2,4c2,4
< /dev/sd1j 9262808 4116710 468295847%/public/file/0
< /dev/sd1l 101182217607678515618%/usr/src
< /dev/sd1m 1035
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:41:40PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> This is very odd on several fronts. First, someone has obviously
> been writing on the MBR for no good reason. I just tested an fdisk
> compiled to day and noticed no oddities on my i386.
>
> Second, the fact that you find a d
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:58:18PM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 07:50:24PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > I have thinking a bit more about the problem, and it is very likely the
> > following scenario happened:
> >
> > 1. Kernel upgrade by
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 07:50:24PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> I have thinking a bit more about the problem, and it is very likely the
> following scenario happened:
>
> 1. Kernel upgrade by source.
>
> 2. Reboot
>
> 3. Kernel reads old disklabel format and converts it in-memory to the
> new v
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:51:48AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> There were some validations checkc added to partitions. If a bad
> partition is found, it will be marked "unused". The checks were a
> little to strict for some cases. A fix for that went in yesterday, so
> try a new snap.
>
> If th
I follow -current on an i386 at work and an amd64 at home, and rarely
run into any problem which is not self-inflicted. So when I had a weird
experience this weekend, I assumed it was my fault.
What happened was that after the usual sequence of [build kernel;
reboot; build userland; reboot] the s
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:52:06AM -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> >In the UK we are not all of this intellect.
>
> I'm certain this guy is joking. At least I hope so. ;)
>
> I ran a whois on his email, and he appears to be located in Essex.
> Though the name seems Spanish, so perhaps he's still up
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:13:48PM -0500, Denny White wrote:
> I've been running a snapshot from several months back & got my
> new 4.1 cds finally. Uname shows OpenBSD 4.1 Generic#0. I want
> to keep my existing /home & /data partitions, delete all the
> rest, recreate them & finish the install. A
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:45:37PM -0400, Suzuki Kawasaki wrote:
> If OpenBSD is the most uber secure why does it run on Solaris?
>
> http://www.openbsd.org was running Apache on Solaris when last queried at
> 18-May-2007 19:52:41 GMT - refresh now Site Report
RTFFAQ: http://openbsd.org/faq/faq8.
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:33:15AM -0500, Travers Buda wrote:
> Well since nobody has posted this to misc@ yet, I suppose I will.
> It's obvious that CVS is currently in a state of being completely
> hosed.
The email I got from the cron job for this morning's csup update has
64,633 "Delete" lines
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:11:00PM -0300, John Nietzsche wrote:
> i am trying to get my windows boxes access nfs directly by means of
> SFU, too!
> I would like to have a global mount, say drive g: to mount from my
> home directories.
>
> Is it possible? How have you been doing in order to get a
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:43:51AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Just checked out -current sources from rt.fm.
It doesn't look like any of the cvs mirrors have recovered. If you
think "src" is bad, take a look at "xenocara"
/dev/wd1i 102963055859041956057%/usr/src
/dev/wd1n
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Martin Toft wrote:
> Nobody answered my second "question" though :) Maybe nobody knows the
> answer? :)
> Summary: I was once told not to use openbsd.org; it was said that
> www.openbsd.org was the only valid site (ignoring mirror sites). Is this
> just bul
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:58:58PM +0100, Patrick Useldinger wrote:
> So I guess I am missing something decisive here. Can anybody shed some
> light on _why_ there are 2 different ways to update?
It might help to think about it as the process for keeping up with
-stable being identical to the pro
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:27:55AM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
> I suspect there is some kind of incompatibility between OpenBSD 4.0
> (i386 and amd64) and ASUS A8V motherboards.
>
> We have a few of these motherboards in use and since we upgraded to
> OpenBSD 4.0 they freeze from time to ti
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:47:32PM +, Craig Skinner wrote:
> Don't do that. DJB junk is not in ports for good reasons.
As far as I know, DJB software is not in ports because his opinions on
licensing and filesystem hierarchy are very different from Theo's (and
most everybody else's) not becaus
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:47:36PM -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> after having used djbdns for a while i must suggest you not use it. when
> i used to use it there was some problem where windows machines could not
> query the server and i would have to restart it. the commands to
> manipulate
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 09:13:30AM -0800, Pawel S. Veselov wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone was able to create Yahoo login/password without
> running their CD. As I understand, the DSL installation CD just knows which
> servers to go to to associate the phone line with the account information,
>
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 10:29:30AM -0600, Emilio Perea wrote:
> The relevant dmesg line:
>
> Toshiba America, 3CXM056-BNW, 3COM/NoteWorthy 56K Modem" \
> port 0xa3f8/8: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
Sorry. That should have been:
pccom3 at pcmcia1 function 0 "Toshiba Ameri
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:23:06PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> I have a cardbus modem that I've used for years. The relevant line in
> the dmesg data is
>
> pccom3 at pcmcia1 function 0 "U.S. Robotics, XJ/CC1560, Megahertz 56kbps \
> Modem" port 0xa3f8/8: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
I started to rep
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:54:35PM +0200, Falk Husemann wrote:
> Hello List!
> We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
> know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
>
>
> As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard
> disk and a
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 07:01:21PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> Emilio Perea wrote:
> > I ran into a problem when rebooting to a current kernel (i386 GENERIC)
> > due to a secondary disk without an 'a' partition.
>
> I don't think the lack of an 'a'
I ran into a problem when rebooting to a current kernel (i386 GENERIC)
due to a secondary disk without an 'a' partition. Disk sd0 checked out
fine, but all the partitions on sd1 had bad magic numbers and failed
fsck:
/dev/rsd1d: BAD SUPER BLOCK: MAGIC NUMBER WRONG
/dev/rsd1d: UNEXPECTED INCONSIST
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:44:30AM -0700, Richard P. Koett wrote:
> Based on other people's responses it sounds like no kernel
> customization is even required on this device.
I started out using flashdist on mine, but switched to a standard
installation on a 1G flash card (/ mounted rw,noatime,so
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:38:35AM -0500, Karle, Chris wrote:
> If you're using a "rl*" can you take a look at your mbuf usage (netstat -m)?
> Me and another person both see something similar.
OpenBSD 3.9-stable (i386 GENERIC)
% dmesg | grep rl
rl0 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 "Realtek 8139" rev 0x1
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:01:07AM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
>
> just a quick question, anyone running OpenBSD/amd64 on an Asus A8N-VM or
> A8V-VM motherboard? Things that work/don't work?
I have been using an Asus A8V since February. Had lots of problems at
first, which seem to ha
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:38:32PM -0700, Peter Valchev wrote:
> The Feb 15 X snapshot should have this fixed.
The keyboard issue is fixed, but now mouse buttons don't work.
#dmesg
OpenBSD 3.9-beta (GENERIC) #602: Wed Feb 15 17:33:53 MST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/G
Installing the latest (Feb 13) i386 x*tgz on two different computers
caused the keyboard to lock up. Mouse continued to work, but I was not
able to type anything or switch consoles. The systems involved were a
Dell Precision 330 workstation (upgrade) and a Toshiba 3480CT laptop
(new install to se
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 12:04:33PM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
> I just had a major AhHa moment while I was deleting whiny posts from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] The number of whiny posts increases dramatically right
> before,
> during and shortly after the release of a new version.
>
> Perhaps I should
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:32:49PM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
> I've run OpenBSD on a Dimension 2400 for a short time without problems.
>
> Will send you a dmesg if I find one available in the morning.
Unfortunately, I was not able to find an unused one to install OpenBSD
on, b
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:59:24PM -0500, Kevin wrote:
> Looking at the Dell Dimension line (probably the 2400 or 3000)
> one concern is that I don't see *any* reports, success or failure,
> running OpenBSD on this particular product?
I've run OpenBSD on a Dimension 2400 for a short time without p
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:48:21PM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> >> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;555372
> >
> > You could post a URL that actually works..
>
> They took it down, but the KB article w
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:25:35PM +0200, Anders Jvnsson wrote:
> Hello folks.
> I recently bought a very good book: Mastering FreeBSD and OpenBSD security
> They have a chapter dealing with DNS servers and there they mention
> djbdns, they think it has some strong point s so I am somewhat curios
>
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:41:25PM +0200, Daniel Kekneryd wrote:
> Hi, tried to install a program called cksfv but it couldn't compile
> cause I missing the file stdint.h. I mannage to go around this by
> including the file inttypes.h and I also told the cksfv developer this
> and he made a patch f
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:00:40PM +0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> a portion of daily output:
>
> ...
> mail:
> 27 Apr 2005 02:24:28 GMT #1834485 9664 <>
> remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 24 Apr 2005 00:16:13 GMT #1834467 3474 <>
> remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 27 Apr 2005 02:2
87 matches
Mail list logo
