I am seeking advice in regards to OpenBSD and the vic driver on ESXi server.
I currently lease a physical ESXi server. One of the VMs is an OpenBSD 5.0
system which is configured as a router and serves as a gateway for all the
other VMs. This configuration has many advantages for me because it giv
am not but I understand the value of an open
platform. I suppose that alone is enough to make the shoes vs 737
comparison, but I'm asking along the lines of things you can do simply
through configuration.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Matthew Weigel wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2013, at 5:
p there!
>
> So, I don't think you are really understanding what you are asking I think.
>
>
> On 2/15/13 11:05 PM, Fil DiNoto wrote:
>> I was drawing from situations where we implemented hardware from a
>> less well known vendor that has a completely different conf
I was drawing from situations where we implemented hardware from a
less well known vendor that has a completely different configuration
style than what most people are used to. We end up having more outages
caused by human error to the point where the equipment gets a bad
reputation.
Unfortunately
Thanks for the reply Theo, big fan of OpenBSD
Someone referred me to NSH which is exactly what I was thinking of. It
even incorporates ifconfig so you can do all the layer 2 stuff which
is more than I was hoping for. Can't wait to play with it. I know
exactly what you mean about the hardware diffe
I was wondering why nobody has ever created a shell for pf so that you
could manipulate it in a way similar to JunOS instead of editing
pf.conf. Also show / monitor commands. Hierarchical edit mode, stuff
like that.
I noticed a huge difference in SCP speeds by changing the client.
For example the client WinSCP is much slower than FileZilla.
I am uncertain if there is any significant difference between SCP and
SFTP protocols (I think SCP2 is SFTP). I know both are handled by the
SSH server.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2
;> On 2012-07-09 10:17, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> On 2012-07-09, Fil DiNoto wrote:
>>>> But i was wondering if I could achieve something that would work for
>>>> ALL the addresses behind the router as well without creating
>>>> individual rules fo
I am trying to achieve something I thought would be simple, but
haven't had any luck.
I have an OpenBSD 5.0 router/firewall with public IP X.X.X.A
Behind it are a mix of OpenBSD and Linux systems, all with public IP. NO NAT.
I run ssh on an alternate port, XXX22. However, from a certain
locatio
9 matches
Mail list logo