On 19/03/2020 8:45 am, Martijn van Duren wrote:
On 3/18/20 8:41 PM, Matthieu wrote:
Le 18/03/2020 à 19:39, Hiltjo Posthuma a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 06:23:30PM +0100, Matthieu wrote:
Hi everybody
I'm looking to use OpenDKIM with OpenSMTPd. Has anyone ever done it before ?
My first
On 6/06/2019 6:50 am, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 05:44:41PM +, Benny wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I am planning a mail server of opensmtpd and dovecot. I'd be glad to know if there is any
way to save a copy of mail to dovecot's "Sent" mail box before relaying them
out.
sorry,
On 27-Sep 14:42, Alexandre Westfahl wrote:
Hi,
I have trouble configuring ipsec with my sokeris 6501 (OBSD 5.7) with a
carrier router (Juniper).
SA seems to work well, I see packets going out on em0 and also see them on
enc0. However, the other side said nothing come but they also see SA
The cause is Cisco routers with a max 512k entries in their FIB on some
older units.
http://www.bgpmon.net/what-caused-todays-internet-hiccup/
Graeme
On 18-Aug 10:27, Rod Whitworth wrote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/how-flakey-is-the-inter
net-20140816-104t8p.html
I
On 27/10/2011 10:22 AM, Zantgo wrote:
WTF? I use OpenBSD and hate the other operating systems
Zantgo
It's like this:
Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.
El 26-10-2011, a las 20:11, Bryan Irvinesparcta...@gmail.com escribiC3:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Zantgozan...@gmail.com
route add -inet6 2a00:1ff8:101:: -prefixlen 48 2a00:1ff8:102:ac01::1
Have a look at /etc/netstart for some guidance
On 21/04/2011 9:57 AM, Roger Schreiter wrote:
Hello,
I tried:
route add -inet6 2a00:1ff8:101::/48 2a00:1ff8:102:ac01::1
and got:
route: 2a00:1ff8:101::/48: bad value
I do
FreeBSD and Linux
The routing is done on FreeBSD. UI on Linux
It's hardly rocket science either. It could easily be done on OpenBSD,
but we would need to add a strip private or similar to make it
implementable.
On 14/03/2010 2:24 AM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
Hi guys,
I was reading the
On 14/01/2010 5:33 PM, James Peltier wrote:
--- On Thu, 1/14/10, James Peltierjames_a_pelt...@yahoo.ca wrote:
/etc/hostname.vlan301
--
inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 NONE vlandev em0 description
Uplink
Please note that I've typed this wrong and it actually has
inet
On 15/01/2010 3:13 AM, James Peltier wrote:
--- On Thu, 1/14/10, Graeme Leegra...@omni.net.au wrote:
From: Graeme Leegra...@omni.net.au
Subject: Re: VLANs, OpenBSD, Cisco HP
To: misc@openbsd.org
Received: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 3:27 AM
inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 NONE vlan
On 15/01/2010 1:25 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2010-01-15, Graeme Leegra...@omni.net.au wrote:
Either syntax works. However, had a re-read of your initial email, and
you were missing the vlan 301 in your configuration line.
It's no longer necessary, it defaults to the number
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 04:51:12PM +1100, Graeme Lee wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
tico wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
tico wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
snip
Ok forget bgp configs
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:43:10AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:22:08AM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote:
On a hunch, I tried a 64bit and a 32 bit
Rogier Krieger wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 02:09, Graeme Lee gra...@omni.net.au wrote:
The bgpd log shows this:
bgpd: send_rtmsg: action 1, prefix 2001:dc8:c000::/36: Network is
unreachable
bgpd: send_rtmsg: action 1, prefix 2a01:a8::/32: Network is unreachable
for every network received
tico wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
snip
Network layout is somewhat complicated. 1 x ebgp and 1 x ibgp
session receive ipv4 world tables. Gif tunnel to a hurricane router
in Hong Kong. I'm receiving ipv6 world bgp tables from this peer.
Connectivity to the peer is fine. Just can't get past
tico wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
tico wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
snip
Network layout is somewhat complicated. 1 x ebgp and 1 x ibgp
session receive ipv4 world tables. Gif tunnel to a hurricane
router in Hong Kong. I'm receiving ipv6 world bgp tables from this
peer. Connectivity
Graeme Lee wrote:
tico wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
tico wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
snip
Network layout is somewhat complicated. 1 x ebgp and 1 x ibgp
session receive ipv4 world tables. Gif tunnel to a hurricane
router in Hong Kong. I'm receiving ipv6 world bgp tables from
this peer
Graeme Lee wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
tico wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
tico wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
snip
Network layout is somewhat complicated. 1 x ebgp and 1 x ibgp
session receive ipv4 world tables. Gif tunnel to a hurricane
router in Hong Kong. I'm receiving ipv6 world bgp tables
Hi all.
I'm having problems with ipv6 on openbgpd, in that it isn't installing
received ipv6 routes into the kernel's routing table. It receives
them. I can advertise my own prefix just fine. But netstat -rnf inet6
shows only the basic static table.
The bgpd log shows this:
bgpd:
tico wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:47:31PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Claudio Jeker
cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote:
I looked at the porblem and I'm currently unsure what the best way
is to
handle such bad AS4_* attributes. The
I have applied the patch supplied by Henning, and now get the following in
my bgpctl show neighbor
Neighbor capabilities:
Multiprotocol extensions: IPv4 Unicast (previously was unknown (128))
yes, with my patch, we simply ignore the annoucement and show the default.
Can this
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-25 17:27]:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 03:54:27PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Graeme Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-25 03:28]:
Yes but the safi's are handled during capability negotiation (in function
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Graeme Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-21 03:31]:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Graeme Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-21 01:51]:
I've had to connect to a new upstream peer which is advertising an IPv4
safi of 128 (MPLS-labelled VPN address)
see http
I've had to connect to a new upstream peer which is advertising an IPv4
safi of 128 (MPLS-labelled VPN address)
see http://www.iana.org/assignments/safi-namespace
I've modified the source to temporarily ignore this (actually anything
over 127) as it currently only accepts 1 thru 3. Once the
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Graeme Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-21 01:51]:
I've had to connect to a new upstream peer which is advertising an IPv4
safi of 128 (MPLS-labelled VPN address)
see http://www.iana.org/assignments/safi-namespace
I've modified the source to temporarily ignore
David B. wrote:
trying to get postgres to start up at boot. found this at
postgresql's site
On OpenBSD, add the following lines to the file /etc/rc.local:
if [ -x /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_ctl -a -x
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster ]; then
su - -c '/usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_ctl start -l
frantisek holop wrote:
hi there,
it is not my intention to pick a fight again about t-shirts,
size, color, etc.
but i was just wondering... the other day i went out in my
puffy wireframe t-shirt and people who never heard of openbsd
noticed it and expressed how nice and catchy it was.
My
Luke Fogarty wrote:
Hi
Since moving from Cable to DSL, squid no longer starts on boot. I have
the following entry in /etc/rc.local
#start squid
if [ -f /usr/local/squid/sbin/squid ]; then
echo -n ' Squid'
/usr/local/sbin/squid
I've also tried just having
Jason Dixon wrote:
I'm working with a fairly sizable ruleset with a lot of inter-VLAN
routing, so I've chosen to implement if-bound stateful tracking with
anchors and tagging. For some reason, PF is failing to route the
binat traffic to the internal host. In a typical case, the firewall
man Chan wrote:
Hello,
I would like t know where can I get the authentication
users using LDAP via Radius as it seems unavailable at
the openbsd journel. Any pointers ? Thanks.
Not sure about the ones in the ports tree, but freeradius works well
http://www.freeradius.org/
Fine. If the pg team want to call their shared memory space a disk
buffer, let them. And you can too. Anything committed to disk still
has to traverse the os disk cache. So in reality, it depends upon how
you balance parameters such as your os disk cache and your sql disk
cache etc etc. I
Adam wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:01:12 +1000 Graeme Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think I was talking about the disk buffer, not the shared buffer.
You said it uses the os disk buffer and doesn't maintain its own.
its own disk buffer
Everything that reads data from
Adam wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:08:36 +1000 Graeme Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is very much off topic, but you seem to be misunderstanding me.
The shared buffer is used by all the postmaster processes as a shared
memory pool for selects/inserts/updates on the table space
David Hill wrote:
Hello -
I need to build a server that will run PostgreSQL 8, handling up to 150
connections. The current database size is roughly 2GB now with 2.8 million
rows in it's biggest table. This is expected to continue to grow steadily over
time.
The hardware I have to work with
Adam wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:28:20 +1000 Graeme Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Postgresql uses the os disk buffer. It does not maintain its own.
Yes it does. Postgresql uses a shared buffer cache, and increasing the
number of shared buffers in your postgresql.conf can make
Roberto Pereyra wrote:
Hi
Look http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/es/pools.html
Or you could potentially use the route-to option
eg
pass in on $link1_if reply-to ($link1_if $link1_defroute) proto icmp
keep state
pass in on $link2_if reply-to ($link2_if $link2_defroute) proto icmp
keep state
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
supply a firewall/router using OpenBSD when there was thsi device:
http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=327 , with all its claimed bells and
whistles.
Well, I we connected a new client with straight
Clint Pachl wrote:
Is there any issues I should consider before buying this modem? Will
it work with Open3.7? I know it works fine with Linux.
I highly doubt there will be any issues. The communication between the
switch (built-in to the modem) and your OpenBSD box uses the TCP/IP
37 matches
Mail list logo
