On 12/3/18 5:00 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> thanks for the report.
>
> We’re going to disable pvclock until I found a solution. It seems that old
> KVMs or KVM on old CPUs report stable support incorrectly.
>
> Do you have a dmesg?
I mistakenly sent the following to bugs@ and it appears to be gre
On 01/03/17 11:16, Adam Van Ymeren wrote:
> On 01/03/17 02:15, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
>> Adam Van Ymeren writes:
>>> I was attempting to to use android's adb toolbut when I enable usb
>>> debugging on my phoneit appears to repeatedly detach/reattach the device.
>>>
>>> Anyone experience this bef
On 11/24/16 15:15, Tito Mari Francis H. Escaño wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Can somebody please recommend me a firewall appliance that can run OpenBSD
and
> pf, and can be upgradeable to the latest version? It would be a great plus
if
> the appliance can also be configured as part of CARP firewall group
On 03/30/15 10:12, Peter Kay wrote:
> On 30 March 2015 13:03:36 BST, RD Thrush wrote:
>> The OP's OpenBSD partition is located above 128G, ie. sector
>> start=842752000, which may have led to the complicated work-around.
>
> I'm pretty certain the artificia
On 03/29/15 22:19, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 03/29/15 14:25, Tuyosi Takesima wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> this is my little expirience , it may be useful using openbsd & linux in
>> tha same hard disk .
> ...
>> i want to install openbsd OS into sdb4 .
>> But to install OpenBSD directly is risky .
>> if
On 01/13/15 16:26, Landry Breuil wrote:
[ .. snip .. ]
>> On 1/10/15, Landry Breuil wrote:
[ .. snip .. ]
>>
>> Interesting, your cpu doesnt have SSSE3 nor SSE4.1, while binutils/the
>> configure script detects so.. that might explain why it built here and
>> not on your ma
sendmail's masquerade function is missing from OpenSMTPD. What are the plans
for masquerade? Update OpenSMTPD or create a sendmail port or document the
smtpd filter API or ??? I've previously asked for help on the opensmtpd-misc
mailing list[2].
Searching the archives shows that work (on mas
For many years, I have reliably used read-only partitions for /usr and
/usr/local. -current sysmerge breaks that assumption.
i7v64:OpenBSD/sysmerge 980>CMD="env PAGER=cat sysmerge -b -s ${ETC_TGZ} -x
${XETC_TGZ}"
i7v64:OpenBSD/sysmerge 981>sudo $CMD
===> Fetching file:///nas2/public/OpenBSD/sna
On 02/12/14 02:53, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:37 PM, RD Thrush wrote:
> ...
>> I didn't expect those perms to matter w/ Xorg -configure -keepPriv.
>
> With the perms on /dev/drm[0-3] set so that you own them, what happens
> when you don't u
On 02/11/14 19:53, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:32:25AM -0500, RD Thrush wrote:
>> On 02/10/14 13:20, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>>> On 10 February 2014 13:11, RD Thrush wrote:
>>>> With a somewhat recent i7 desktop, using startx, X seems to run
On 02/12/14 03:01, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 02:37:30AM -0500, RD Thrush wrote:
>> On 02/11/14 19:45, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 01:20:46PM -0500, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>>>> On 10 February 2014 13:11, RD Thrush wrote:
&
On 02/11/14 19:45, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 01:20:46PM -0500, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>> On 10 February 2014 13:11, RD Thrush wrote:
>>> With a somewhat recent i7 desktop, using startx, X seems to run ok;
>>> however, at 1024x768 rather
On 02/10/14 13:20, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> On 10 February 2014 13:11, RD Thrush wrote:
>> With a somewhat recent i7 desktop, using startx, X seems to run ok; however,
>> at 1024x768 rather than the expected 1920x1200 resolution. ctl-alt-keypad+
>> or - have no effect on
With a somewhat recent i7 desktop, using startx, X seems to run ok; however, at
1024x768 rather than the expected 1920x1200 resolution. ctl-alt-keypad+ or -
have no effect on resolution. ctl-alt-backspace correctly reverts to text
mode. I then tried Xorg -configure to look for hints to improv
On 11/17/13 14:02, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 11/17/13 12:53, Wesley MOUEDINE ASSABY wrote:
>> Le 2013-11-17 20:27, dmitry.sensei a écrit :
>>> What about 1Tb disk? Is CHS mode correct for this disks?
>>
>> I done the test using Virtualization.
>> Not tried with a physical hard drive 1 TB.
>
> The
On 10/10/13 17:48, RD Thrush wrote:
> I noticed some anomalies in the dmesg on this new system.
>
> 1. error: [drm:pid0:i915_write32] *ERROR* Unknown unclaimed register before
> writing to 10
>
> 2. dhclient doesn't work with the onboard nic (possibly since the l
On 10/11/13 03:18, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 02:39:30AM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
>> On 10/11/13 01:05, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:48:43PM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
>>>> I noticed some anomalies in the dmesg on this
On 10/11/13 01:05, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:48:43PM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
>> I noticed some anomalies in the dmesg on this new system.
>>
>> 1. error: [drm:pid0:i915_write32] *ERROR* Unknown unclaimed register before
>> writing to 10
>
On 10/11/13 01:28, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:48:43PM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
>> I noticed some anomalies in the dmesg on this new system.
>>
>> 1. error: [drm:pid0:i915_write32] *ERROR* Unknown unclaimed register before
>> writing to 10
&
On 10/10/13 19:31, Brett Mahar wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:48:43 -0400
> RD Thrush wrote:
>
> | I noticed some anomalies in the dmesg on this new system.
> |
> ...
> |
> | 2. dhclient doesn't work with the onboard nic (possibly since the lladdr is
> 0:0:0:
On 09/12/13 10:34, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 12/09/13(Thu) 08:16, RD Thrush wrote:
>> On 09/12/13 05:15, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Could you try the diff below on the v1 machine and tell me if it helps?
>>
>> Thanks, I don't
On 09/12/13 05:15, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 11/09/13(Wed) 11:03, RD Thrush wrote:
>> On 09/10/13 07:56, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>>> On 10/09/13(Tue) 07:15, RD Thrush wrote:
>>>> On 09/10/13 04:42, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>>>>> [...]
&g
On 09/10/13 07:56, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 10/09/13(Tue) 07:15, RD Thrush wrote:
>> On 09/10/13 04:42, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Thanks for this detailed bug report.
>>>
>>> You're saying that you have 2 amd64 systems
On 09/10/13 07:56, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 10/09/13(Tue) 07:15, RD Thrush wrote:
>> On 09/10/13 04:42, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Thanks for this detailed bug report.
>>>
>>> You're saying that you have 2 amd64 systems
On 09/10/13 04:42, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> On 07/09/13(Sat) 08:14, RD Thrush wrote:
>> Since appx. November, 2012, I've had 2 amd64 systems hang while
>> spewing "ehci_idone: ex=0x80.. is done!" messages to the
>> serial console
Since appx. November, 2012, I've had 2 amd64 systems hang while
spewing "ehci_idone: ex=0x80.. is done!" messages to the
serial console. The hangs are intermittent. The system is
unresponsive to the keyboard and doesn't respond to network ping. A
hardware reset is necessary to regain
I expected "machine memory =1G" to reduce the memory size of this system from
8GB to 1GB. After the first invocation, free memory is reduced to ~6GB. The
second invocation results in the expected ~1GB free memory.
My intention is to limit the size of a subsequent crash dump. I'm surprised it
On 06/27/12 10:59, RD Thrush wrote:
> On 06/26/12 12:36, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
>> This looks similar to the pppoe(4) bug that stsp fixed last year:
>> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=130288210121749&w=2
>>
>> Seems to me like sppp_clear_ip_addresses() nee
Since the bug tracker is broken, I'm sending sendbug info to misc and bugs...
>Synopsis: The system hung hard while using xenocara>
>Category: kernel
System : OpenBSD 5.0
Details : OpenBSD 5.0-beta (GENERIC.MP) #34: Tue Jul 19 20:07:26
MDT 2011
dera...@amd64.openb
I used sendbug to send a problem report[1] yesterday and haven't yet received an
ack or seen the echo on bugs@. Is something in the sendbug/gnats framework
down? (FWIW, the gnats mail was accepted at shear.ucar.edu).
I send a note[2] to bugs@ this morning with sendmail details as well as most
On 03/14/11 21:06, Scott McEachern wrote:
I bought some new hardware the other day, including an Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
motherboard and an AMD Phenom II X6 1100T CPU.
The problem is that the kernel freezes when booting any of: bsd.rd, for either
amd64 or i386, -current or 4.8-stable; any GENERIC ke
>>>>> "a" == Ariane van der Steldt writes:
a> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 01:57:55PM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
>> I've recently noticed reduced performance when building ports for
>> amd64 and i386 platforms on multiprocessor boxes. I found the problem
>
I've recently noticed reduced performance when building ports for
amd64 and i386 platforms on multiprocessor boxes. I found the problem
was associated with running a 'nice'd dnetc [1] process on each
processor. Without the 'nice'd processes, performance improves
dramatically.
In a test case, ela
Bernd Ahlers wrote:
> RD Thrush [Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:36:42AM -0500] wrote:
>> I've noticed the last three sendbug reports have gone missing, ie. no
>> ack was received nor was the report logged in the OpenBSD bug tracking
>> database.
>>
>> sendbug(1)
I've noticed the last three sendbug reports have gone missing, ie. no
ack was received nor was the report logged in the OpenBSD bug tracking
database.
sendbug(1) mails the report to gn...@openbsd.org. The highest
priority MX for openbsd.org is shear.ucar.edu which received each
report correctly (
>>>>> "rd" == RD Thrush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
rd> I have experienced kernel hangs w/ -current snapshots on Athlon 64 X2
rd> and Sempron boxes. Both GENERIC and GENERIC.MP snapshots exhibit the
rd> hang. Once hung, the boxes don't respond t
I have experienced kernel hangs w/ -current snapshots on Athlon 64 X2
and Sempron boxes. Both GENERIC and GENERIC.MP snapshots exhibit the
hang. Once hung, the boxes don't respond to pings; however, keyboard
LEDs toggle as expected and I can enter ddb from the keyboard.
kernel/5777 [1] has the fu
37 matches
Mail list logo
