On 13/06/2024 14:51, Willy Manga wrote:
Hi,
On 12/06/2024 12:50, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
[...]
2) I've found this tool yesterday (iprange) that it's job is to
optimize large sets of IPs/Networks
https://github.com/firehol/iprange/wiki
I think that's why you have the 'tables' [1
://man.openbsd.org/pf.conf#TABLES
--
Willy Manga
]
1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6164
--
Willy Manga
anges,
so it can't be that either.
Ideas ?
Random question: do you still have enough space and/or inodes?
--
Willy Manga
previous email).
If they find difficult to route more than 1x/64 (that will be a shame )
they can stick to 1x/64 but honestly it should not be a big deal.
--
Willy Manga
ault is 'swallowed' here.
Now any subnet used by any interface (like vether0) here will be
reachable from the Internet and of course the VM as well will reach
other networks.
--
Willy Manga
configured
Do you have them in the routing table?
--
Willy Manga
.
On 11/04/2024 16:43, Julian Huhn wrote:
Moin!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 04:01:49PM +0400, Willy Manga wrote:
On 10/04/2024 18:24, Julian Huhn wrote:
x270$ ifconfig umb0
umb0: flags=8851 mtu 1500
index 5 priority 6 llprio 3
roaming enabled registration home network
inet 10.72.239.216 --> 10.72.239.217 netmask 0xfff0
I don't see a link-local address (fe80::/10). Can you confirm that after
you enabled IPv6 as per your second email that you can see one?
--
Willy Manga
On 14/02/2024 09:31, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Willy Manga wrote:
Is it possible the default ntpd.conf file use something like
"servers openbsd.pool.ntp.org" and of course have openbsd.pool.ntp.org
looking for IPv6 nodes?
Not going to happen.
Fine. Can we at least have a worka
thing like
"servers openbsd.pool.ntp.org" and of course have openbsd.pool.ntp.org
looking for IPv6 nodes?
Thanks.
1. https://github.com/abh/ntppool/issues/231
--
Willy Manga
11 matches
Mail list logo
