Re: password-free SSH was Re: [ot] Security of my bit coin wallet

2017-11-15 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
On 11/15/17 21:50, James wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Gareth Nelson > wrote: >> Use key-based authentication? >> > > Okay, but that doesn't fit the requirement. > I want something iteratively password free. > AFAIK, somewhere along the line in key-based authentication you need > to

Re: password-free SSH was Re: [ot] Security of my bit coin wallet

2017-11-15 Thread Theo de Raadt
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Gareth Nelson wr= > ote: > > Use key-based authentication? > > > > Okay, but that doesn't fit the requirement. > I want something iteratively password free. > AFAIK, somewhere along the line in key-based authentication you need > to enter a password to unlock th

Re: password-free SSH was Re: [ot] Security of my bit coin wallet

2017-11-15 Thread James
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Gareth Nelson wrote: > Use key-based authentication? > Okay, but that doesn't fit the requirement. I want something iteratively password free. AFAIK, somewhere along the line in key-based authentication you need to enter a password to unlock the key. The context o

Re: password-free SSH was Re: [ot] Security of my bit coin wallet

2017-11-15 Thread Gareth Nelson
Use key-based authentication? On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:38 PM, James wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Raul Miller > wrote: > > Assumption is invalid. Flaws are widely documented (e.g. fixed > > supply). Probably wrong list, also. > > > > Ok a little more on topic then. SSH. > > How wo

password-free SSH was Re: [ot] Security of my bit coin wallet

2017-11-15 Thread James
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Raul Miller wrote: > Assumption is invalid. Flaws are widely documented (e.g. fixed > supply). Probably wrong list, also. > Ok a little more on topic then. SSH. How would you secure SSH without a password, iteratively password - free? a blank password does not c

Re: [ot] Security of my bit coin wallet

2017-11-15 Thread Raul Miller
Assumption is invalid. Flaws are widely documented (e.g. fixed supply). Probably wrong list, also. Thanks, -- Raul On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 8:46 AM, James wrote: > While a little off topic it is security related so I hope you don't mind. > > This is the misc list, right? > > Assumption 1. > bit

[ot] Security of my bit coin wallet

2017-11-15 Thread James
While a little off topic it is security related so I hope you don't mind. This is the misc list, right? Assumption 1. bitcoin is a secure protocol without flaws. quote from https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook/blob/second_edition/ch01.asciidoc With these keys they can sign transactions t