Re: -CURRENT intel(4) problem

2009-03-05 Thread Nigel J. Taylor
I just encountered what looks like the same issue. Worked with OpenBSD v4.4, has been working since OpenBSD v3.2. I will try some of the suggestions. I also noticed that the /dev/drm0 is being removed, and then complaining it's not there any longer. Running MAKEDEV recreates /dev/drm0. Attached

Re: -CURRENT intel(4) problem

2009-02-25 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:38:43 + Owain Ainsworth zer...@googlemail.com wrote: I just singed up for freedesktop.org this morning, and I'm collecting the needed Xorg.0.log's with full debug info, descriptions and whatnot. It's going to take quite a while experiment with it and write up

Re: -CURRENT intel(4) problem

2009-02-23 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:35:58 +0100 Matthieu Herrb mhe...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:56 AM, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org wrote: Is there anything else I could do to help fix this instability bug? Fill a bug to bugs.freedesktop.org (product Xorg) with as many

Re: -CURRENT intel(4) problem

2009-02-23 Thread Marco Peereboom
You are not the one paying the fixers unfortunately. The only influence you have is what Matthieu suggested. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:10:39AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:35:58 +0100 Matthieu Herrb mhe...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:56 AM, J.C.

Re: -CURRENT intel(4) problem

2009-02-23 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:27:08 -0600 Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote: You are not the one paying the fixers unfortunately. The only influence you have is what Matthieu suggested. Thanks Marco. If I'm reading Mathieu and you correctly, I have to take this upstream to get it fixed, and

Re: -CURRENT intel(4) problem

2009-02-23 Thread Theo de Raadt
After watching the old i810(4) driver work fine for me, and seeing all the bug reports on the new intel(4) driver, I've got this bad feeling that nobody cared to test it on the older chipsets... i.e. they are not getting paid to care about legacy support. Would this be a correct assessment?

Re: -CURRENT intel(4) problem

2009-02-22 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 8:27 AM, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org wrote: Hi list, I'm a having few issues with the new intel(4) driver in X on -CURRENT using the snapshot from two days ago. The system is an IBM Netvista 8310-XXS and uses an integrated Intel 82845G. The dmesg is below.

Re: -CURRENT intel(4) problem

2009-02-22 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:11:28 +0100 Matthieu Herrb mhe...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know much about X driver internals, but on the majority of failures to start, it seems the new intel(4) driver is failing to map memory properly. If you've got any ideas, or if there is something specific

Re: -CURRENT intel(4) problem

2009-02-22 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:56 AM, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org wrote: Is there anything else I could do to help fix this instability bug? Fill a bug to bugs.freedesktop.org (product Xorg) with as many details as posslbe, and pray that the intel guys eventually take support for their

-CURRENT intel(4) problem

2009-02-21 Thread J.C. Roberts
Hi list, I'm a having few issues with the new intel(4) driver in X on -CURRENT using the snapshot from two days ago. The system is an IBM Netvista 8310-XXS and uses an integrated Intel 82845G. The dmesg is below. The hardware itself is fine, and it previously ran 4.4-stable perfectly, albeit on