On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:25:54 +0100
Pau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> yes, this is a thinkpad x200s. But the true resolution is picked up
> (1440x900), I think
>
> xrander and dmesg follow
>
> I haven't tried any other wm... I got the machine four days ago with
> windows vista on it, which I deleted. I wi
I just tried fvwm and when I press the buttom to maximise a window, it
fills in the whole screen...
Adding gap 0 0 0 0 didn't help either
Hello,
yes, this is a thinkpad x200s. But the true resolution is picked up
(1440x900), I think
xrander and dmesg follow
I haven't tried any other wm... I got the machine four days ago with
windows vista on it, which I deleted. I will now try a different wm
--
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 22:30:06 +0100
Pau wrote:
> sorry, I have to add a bit more of information:
>
> C M f toggles the window to 85% of the full screen horizontally and
> about 60% vertically, the left corner of the window is the only corner
> touching the physical limit of the screen
>
> I was g
Very strange indeed. You might try `gap 0 0 0 0` to reset it to default
values.
Pau wrote:
sorry, I have to add a bit more of information:
C M f toggles the window to 85% of the full screen horizontally and
about 60% vertically, the left corner of the window is the only corner
touching the phy
sorry, I have to add a bit more of information:
C M f toggles the window to 85% of the full screen horizontally and
about 60% vertically, the left corner of the window is the only corner
touching the physical limit of the screen
I was giving the values from whatI remembered, sorry.
2009/3/2 Pau
Pau wrote:
funny, I have the problem with all applications... I will check which
snapshot I am using
2009/3/2 J.C. Roberts :
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:27:23 -0500 Okan Demirmen
wrote:
On Mon 2009.03.02 at 13:40 +0100, Pau wrote:
Hello,
I am running -current and cwm combination C
I mean vertically, the left side of the screen is used
> when you say half the screen, do you mean of the x or y axis? how about
> vertical max only?
>
>> 2009/3/2 J.C. Roberts :
>> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:27:23 -0500 Okan Demirmen
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon 2009.03.02 at 13:40 +0100, Pau wr
On Mon 2009.03.02 at 18:53 +0100, Pau wrote:
> funny, I have the problem with all applications... I will check which
> snapshot I am using
when you say half the screen, do you mean of the x or y axis? how about
vertical max only?
> 2009/3/2 J.C. Roberts :
> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:27:23 -0500 Ok
I used X -config and that file (xorg.conf) I edited to add the new
paths to fonts I later installed
But everything I use is startx, nothing else, so I am not changing
anything afterwards
I can try to do it on the fly, i.e. without xorg.conf
2009/3/2 Dan Harnett :
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 06:53:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 06:53:48PM +0100, Pau wrote:
> funny, I have the problem with all applications... I will check which
> snapshot I am using
Are you using RandR? Or more specifically, changing the resolution,
number of heads, or screen orientation dynamically?
funny, I have the problem with all applications... I will check which
snapshot I am using
2009/3/2 J.C. Roberts :
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:27:23 -0500 Okan Demirmen
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon 2009.03.02 at 13:40 +0100, Pau wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I am running -current and cwm combination C-M-f seem
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:27:23 -0500 Okan Demirmen
wrote:
> On Mon 2009.03.02 at 13:40 +0100, Pau wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am running -current and cwm combination C-M-f seems to not be
> > working. I don't get a fullscreen, just half of it. I had re-read
> > the man again but there's no indicati
On Mon 2009.03.02 at 13:40 +0100, Pau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running -current and cwm combination C-M-f seems to not be
> working. I don't get a fullscreen, just half of it. I had re-read the
> man again but there's no indication that the combintions of keys
> should have changed.
>
> Any help
Hello,
I am running -current and cwm combination C-M-f seems to not be
working. I don't get a fullscreen, just half of it. I had re-read the
man again but there's no indication that the combintions of keys
should have changed.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pau
--
Let there be peace on
15 matches
Mail list logo