On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Aaron Mason simplersolut...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Andres Salazar ndrsslz...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Bret S. Lambert
bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Setting the controller to AHCI would give OpenBSD access
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Andres Salazar ndrsslz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I dont have obj on ram, or /tmp . Iam using make build.
Use gentoo?
Thank you
Andres
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:02:37AM -0600, Andres
Hello,
Iam confused on the different result I get when I compile userland on
any machine better then a Dual Core 2.5Ghz 2GB RAM 160GB 7200 SATA /
SATA ii
On some machines I get a compile time of 45min, other machines 30min..
and the best of the case I get 30min. Sometimes that machine
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:02:37AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
Hello,
Iam confused on the different result I get when I compile userland on
any machine better then a Dual Core 2.5Ghz 2GB RAM 160GB 7200 SATA /
SATA ii
You're not even telling us how you compile userland. How should we help
Hello,
I dont have obj on ram, or /tmp . Iam using make build.
Thank you
Andres
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:02:37AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
Hello,
Iam confused on the different result I get when I compile userland on
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:27:36AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
Hello,
I dont have obj on ram, or /tmp . Iam using make build.
Thank you
Andres
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:02:37AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
Iam confused on the different result I get when I compile userland on
any machine better then a Dual Core 2.5Ghz 2GB RAM 160GB 7200 SATA /
SATA ii
On some machines I get a compile time of 45min, other machines 30min..
and the best of the case I get 30min. Sometimes that machine that
Iam going to use these machines for database and Iam very concerned
about these results
Honestly, you'd do better asking that on a list dedicated to whatever
database you're going to be running.
In addition to helping you choose hardware to fit your needs, they'll
totally pimp your configs,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Bret S. Lambert
bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
Iam going to use these machines for database and Iam very concerned
about these results
Honestly, you'd do better asking that on a list dedicated to whatever
database you're going to be running.
In addition to
On 2/28/2010 12:02 PM, Andres Salazar wrote:
On some machines I get a compile time of 45min, other machines 30min..
and the best of the case I get 30min. Sometimes that machine that
takes 45min is far better hardware then a DualCore, in this case a
QuadCore with SATA II/sata...
None of us
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Andres Salazar ndrsslz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Bret S. Lambert
bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
Iam going to use these machines for database and Iam very concerned
about these results
Honestly, you'd do better asking that on a list
11 matches
Mail list logo
