Re: Bioctl rounds doesn't appear to affect the passphrase time?

2017-07-03 Thread Joel Sing
On Sunday 25 June 2017 22:28:17 Kevin Chadwick wrote: > Doh... Yeah, starting from scratch with -r works. I guess quickly finding > how long rounds take is not quite as easy as bioctl -d and try again. The number of rounds can also be changed when you change the passphrase on an existing volume.

Re: Bioctl rounds doesn't appear to affect the passphrase time?

2017-06-25 Thread Kevin Chadwick
Doh... Yeah, starting from scratch with -r works. I guess quickly finding how long rounds take is not quite as easy as bioctl -d and try again. I guess the rounds it chooses is equal to a seconds worth, but surprised that it would be exactly 256. Struck me as a maxed byte or something. Sorry for

Re: Bioctl rounds doesn't appear to affect the passphrase time?

2017-06-25 Thread Ted Unangst
Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 20:24:24 +0200 > > > > > > > I started by trying very high values with a simple password and > > > > > expected to have to wait a long time but it was always around 7 > > > > > seconds? > > > > very high as in -r 2000 ? > > > > > > Yeah, 2048

Re: Bioctl rounds doesn't appear to affect the passphrase time?

2017-06-25 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 20:24:24 +0200 > > > > I started by trying very high values with a simple password and > > > > expected to have to wait a long time but it was always around 7 > > > > seconds? > > > very high as in -r 2000 ? > > > > Yeah, 2048? Is there a MAX? > Not really. > > O

Re: Bioctl rounds doesn't appear to affect the passphrase time?

2017-06-23 Thread Ted Unangst
Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 18:13:20 +0200 > > > > > I started by trying very high values with a simple password and > > > expected to have to wait a long time but it was always around 7 > > > seconds? > > very high as in -r 2000 ? > > Yeah, 2048? Is there a MAX? i do not reco

Re: Bioctl rounds doesn't appear to affect the passphrase time?

2017-06-23 Thread Benjamin Baier
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 18:34:54 +0100 Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 18:13:20 +0200 > > > > > I started by trying very high values with a simple password and > > > expected to have to wait a long time but it was always around 7 > > > seconds? > > very high as in -r 2000 ? > > Y

Re: Bioctl rounds doesn't appear to affect the passphrase time?

2017-06-23 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 18:13:20 +0200 > > I started by trying very high values with a simple password and > > expected to have to wait a long time but it was always around 7 > > seconds? > very high as in -r 2000 ? Yeah, 2048? Is there a MAX?

Re: Bioctl rounds doesn't appear to affect the passphrase time?

2017-06-23 Thread Benjamin Baier
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:02:18 +0100 Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On 6.1 i386 with syspatch 004 I am running: > > time /sbin/bioctl -c C -l /dev/vnd0a -r31 softraid0 > > I guess I am simply seeing my passphrase input time and the round has > a marginal affect? Perhaps more on memory usage? Yes you are

Bioctl rounds doesn't appear to affect the passphrase time?

2017-06-23 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On 6.1 i386 with syspatch 004 I am running: time /sbin/bioctl -c C -l /dev/vnd0a -r31 softraid0 I guess I am simply seeing my passphrase input time and the round has a marginal affect? Perhaps more on memory usage? Is 31 the highest number of rounds? I started by trying very high values with a