On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 12:35:57PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 08:15:18AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > Gilles, I also saw the "ca" directive. I've been using the acme
> > > certificates in pki directives, can I use them in the "ca" directive
> > > too?
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 08:15:18AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Gilles, I also saw the "ca" directive. I've been using the acme
> > certificates in pki directives, can I use them in the "ca" directive
> > too? (any advantage in doing this?)
> >
>
> don't touch a knob if you don't KNOW that
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:37:07PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > > Could someone tell me if my
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
> > >
> > > The part I'm not clear is I read in
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:27:21AM -0400, Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:15:00 +0300, Consus wrote:
> > On 15:14 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> >>> On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> you need
On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:15:00 +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 15:14 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
>>> On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
you need an additonal rule such as:
match auth from any sender for any
On 15:20 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> no matter the keywords, there's no way 100% people would be satisfied :)
>
> be happy, first iteration was "match [...] => foobar", now 'action'
> does not look so bad hu ?
Guess so :D
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:15:00PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 15:14 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > > On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias
> > > >
On 15:14 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > > Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
> > > >
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
> > >
> > > The part I'm not clear is I read in
On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
> >
> > The part I'm not clear is I read in current.html remote authenticated
> > users need a explicit rule. Do I
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
>
> The part I'm not clear is I read in current.html remote authenticated
> users need a explicit rule. Do I need to add some "match auth" rule?
>
yes.
before,
Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
The part I'm not clear is I read in current.html remote authenticated
users need a explicit rule. Do I need to add some "match auth" rule?
# /etc/mail/smptd.conf
egress_int="em0"
server="server.roquesor.com"
table aliases
13 matches
Mail list logo
