Re: LLVM license change

Hi Benjamin, The point of interest is which compiler offers technological advantage without limitations and dependency. It is not the trendy product that retains users base, it's the more accessible, reliable and permissive. Theo said it: the moral values have been double (corporate) mortgaged.

Re: LLVM license change

> And that is because corporate "contributor-wannabes" put pressure on the > LLVM foundation. > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091536.html > > It does say "this is an RFC" but that was last year. We are now in this > year: >

Re: LLVM license change

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:29:56 -0500 Amit Kulkarni wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Chris Cappuccio > wrote: > > > Ingo Schwarze [schwa...@usta.de] wrote: > > > Hi Benjamin, > > > > > > kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM

Re: LLVM license change

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > Ingo Schwarze [schwa...@usta.de] wrote: > > Hi Benjamin, > > > > kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400: > > > > > What does the OpenBSD community think about the LLVM proposal to move > > > to

Re: LLVM license change

Ingo Schwarze [schwa...@usta.de] wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400: > > > What does the OpenBSD community think about the LLVM proposal to move > > to the Apache license? > > > >

Re: LLVM license change

Hi Benjamin, kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400: > What does the OpenBSD community think about the LLVM proposal to move > to the Apache license? > > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/104778.html If LLVM would move to the Apache 2 license, we

LLVM license change

What does the OpenBSD community think about the LLVM proposal to move to the Apache license? http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/104778.html Thank you Benjamin Sauerhaft Coplon