2009/3/13 Jean-Francois :
> BTW this thread helped me a lot (I was the originator) and I agree that
> NFS works a lot very well. Over Gigabyte network it's looking like
> really a local disk behaviour.
>
> I have still troubles copying videos because the Linux desktop
> constantly loads the litle s
BTW this thread helped me a lot (I was the originator) and I agree that
NFS works a lot very well. Over Gigabyte network it's looking like
really a local disk behaviour.
I have still troubles copying videos because the Linux desktop
constantly loads the litle snapshot of the vid file it is transfe
2009/3/9 Henning Brauer
> * Guillermo Bernaldo de Quiros Maraver [2009-02-13
> 21:06]:
> > if you have a shared network between WINDOWS and OpenBSD i recommend
> > Samba if not, NFS
> >
> > NFS => Insecure
> > SAMBA => Have a problems, but, it's more secure.
>
> that is the most ridicu
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Guillermo Bernaldo de Quiros Maraver [2009-02-13
> 21:06]:
> > if you have a shared network between WINDOWS and OpenBSD i recommend
> > Samba if not, NFS
> >
> > NFS => Insecure
> > SAMBA => Have a problems, but, it's more secure
* Guillermo Bernaldo de Quiros Maraver [2009-02-13 21:06]:
> if you have a shared network between WINDOWS and OpenBSD i recommend
> Samba if not, NFS
>
> NFS => Insecure
> SAMBA => Have a problems, but, it's more secure.
that is the most ridiculous bullshit I have ever read here in som
On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Jean-Frangois wrote:
Hi,
It's for sharing btw Linux / OpenBSD. Last one is server. Probably
other
than Linux client one day. However for Windowd there are ways to
install
NFS client.
And, all of those ways suck. Sadly, to windows Samba is about the best
method th
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:10:31 +0100
Jean-Frangois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's for sharing btw Linux / OpenBSD. Last one is server. Probably other
> than Linux client one day. However for Windowd there are ways to install
> NFS client.
> I'm not speaking about network bandwith limitations but about the
>
anC'ois wrote:
> > I am mounting network drives. Would you recommand the use of NFS or
> > SAMBA for home use ?
>
> What would you be serving to? PC Boxen? MacOS X? Linux? Another
> OpenBSD box?
>
> Both protocols are appropriate for similar - but not en
if you have a shared network between WINDOWS and OpenBSD i recommend
Samba if not, NFS
NFS => Insecure
SAMBA => Have a problems, but, it's more secure.
2009/2/13, Jean-Frangois :
> Hi All,
>
> I am mounting network drives. Would you recommand the use of NFS or
On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Jean-Frangois wrote:
I am mounting network drives. Would you recommand the use of NFS or
SAMBA for home use ?
What would you be serving to? PC Boxen? MacOS X? Linux? Another
OpenBSD box?
Both protocols are appropriate for similar - but not entirely the same
Hi All,
I am mounting network drives. Would you recommand the use of NFS or
SAMBA for home use ?
For both performance and security, please advise your recommandations.
Thank you.
Regards,
J-F
11 matches
Mail list logo
