On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 03:44:26 +, Ralph W Siegler wrote:
> Stuart Henderson spacehopper.org> writes:
>
>
>> On 2014-04-09, sven falempin gmail.com> wrote:
>> > i which this : https://polarssl.org was open and inside the base
>>
>> You can wish, but that is commercial+GPL code so OpenBSD can
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > The problem with that as I see it is that people will complain about
> > not being able to donate to a specific subset of the project. As
> > with OpenSSH in the past and probably present. The same way many
> > complained before the foundat
> The problem with that as I see it is that people will complain about
> not being able to donate to a specific subset of the project. As
> with OpenSSH in the past and probably present. The same way many
> complained before the foundation existed about paying Theo's power
> bill and humble salary.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Ralph W Siegler wrote:
> Stuart Henderson spacehopper.org> writes:
>
> >
> > On 2014-04-09, sven falempin gmail.com> wrote:
> > > i which this : https://polarssl.org was open and inside the base
> >
> > You can wish, but that is commercial+GPL code so OpenBSD can'
Stuart Henderson spacehopper.org> writes:
>
> On 2014-04-09, sven falempin gmail.com> wrote:
> > i which this : https://polarssl.org was open and inside the base
>
> You can wish, but that is commercial+GPL code so OpenBSD can't use it in base.
What I would wish for is the OpenSSH project to
On 2014-04-09, sven falempin wrote:
> i which this : https://polarssl.org was open and inside the base
You can wish, but that is commercial+GPL code so OpenBSD can't use it in base.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Transport#Overview
Though I wonder how many OpenSSL premium support customer
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:05 PM, noah pugsley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Theo de Raadt >wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 15:09, Mike Small wrote:
> > > > nobody writes:
> > > >
> > > >> "read overrun, so ASLR won't save you"
> > > >
> > > > What if malloc's "G" option were t
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 15:09, Mike Small wrote:
> > > nobody writes:
> > >
> > >> "read overrun, so ASLR won't save you"
> > >
> > > What if malloc's "G" option were turned on? You know, assuming the
> > > subset of the worlds' programs y
8 matches
Mail list logo