On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 14:54, thors...@bonck.net wrote:
> Under 5.4-stable, following configuration sets up a working connection
> for me:
> Having installed OpenBSD-5.5 amd64 the exact same configuration does
> not succeed in setting up a working network connection.
This has finally been fixed.
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 02:11:09AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014-05-02, Thorsten Bonck wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:14:40PM +, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:14:16PM +0200, thors...@bonck.net wrote:
> >> > > maybe you could try to put pppoe0 on rl0,
On 7 May 2014 04:11, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014-05-02, Thorsten Bonck wrote:
>> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:14:40PM +, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:14:16PM +0200, thors...@bonck.net wrote:
>>> > > maybe you could try to put pppoe0 on rl0, untag vlan10 on switch
On 2014-05-02, Thorsten Bonck wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:14:40PM +, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:14:16PM +0200, thors...@bonck.net wrote:
>> > > maybe you could try to put pppoe0 on rl0, untag vlan10 on switch port
>> > > where rl0 is connected and tag other v
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 12:20:24PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>
> 12:02:18.008513 48:01:09:03:04:07 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 8100 36: 802.1Q vid
> 10 pri 3 PPPoE-Discovery
> code Initiation, version 1, type 1, id 0x, length 12
> tag Service-Name, length 0
> tag Host-Uniq,
On 05/02/14 23:18, Thorsten Bonck wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:14:40PM +, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:14:16PM +0200, thors...@bonck.net wrote:
maybe you could try to put pppoe0 on rl0, untag vlan10 on switch port
where rl0 is connected and tag other vl
Em 02-05-2014 18:18, Thorsten Bonck escreveu:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:14:40PM +, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:14:16PM +0200, thors...@bonck.net wrote:
maybe you could try to put pppoe0 on rl0, untag vlan10 on switch port
where rl0 is connected and tag oth
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:14:40PM +, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:14:16PM +0200, thors...@bonck.net wrote:
> > > maybe you could try to put pppoe0 on rl0, untag vlan10 on switch port
> > > where rl0 is connected and tag other vlans on the same port ...
> >
> > Sadly, t
> maybe you could try to put pppoe0 on rl0, untag vlan10 on switch port
> where rl0 is connected and tag other vlans on the same port ...
Sadly, that is not possible for me.
rl0 is directly connected to a Ubiquiti NanoStation M, which is setup as
a blackbox transparent bridge by my ISP.
vlan id 10
On 2.5.2014. 14:54, thors...@bonck.net wrote:
> Under 5.4-stable, following configuration sets up a working connection
> for me:
>
> /etc/hostname.pppoe0:
>
> inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \
> pppoedev vlan10 authproto pap \
> authname 'XXX' authkey 'YYY' up
> dest 0.0.0.1
> !
On 2 May 2014 14:54, wrote:
> Under 5.4-stable, following configuration sets up a working connection
> for me:
>
> /etc/hostname.pppoe0:
>
> inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \
> pppoedev vlan10 authproto pap \
> authname 'XXX' authkey 'YYY' up
> dest 0.0.0.1
> !/sbin/route add de
Under 5.4-stable, following configuration sets up a working connection
for me:
/etc/hostname.pppoe0:
inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \
pppoedev vlan10 authproto pap \
authname 'XXX' authkey 'YYY' up
dest 0.0.0.1
!/sbin/route add default -ifp pppoe0 0.0.0.1
#eof
/etc/hostname.vl
12 matches
Mail list logo
