On 15-10-2014 01:38, Justin Mayes wrote:
> Thanks to both of you for the advice
> Just to followup I ended up with the relayd 'routers' setup as described in
man page but with a script monitor rather than icmp. The monitor finds
gateway for interface in route table and pings it with "-I" interface
, October 10, 2014 4:56 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Route-to with a dynamic 'next hop'
On 2014-10-09, Justin Mayes wrote:
> Ok I got it working. Here is what I did
>
> Enabled multipath routing (sysctl)
> Added the relayd anchor to pf.conf
> Created a relayd.co
On 2014-10-09, Justin Mayes wrote:
> Ok I got it working. Here is what I did
>
> Enabled multipath routing (sysctl)
> Added the relayd anchor to pf.conf
> Created a relayd.conf with this in it
>
> gw1="fxp0"
> gw2="fxp1"
>
> table { $gw1 ip ttl 1, $gw2 ip ttl 1 }
> router "uplinks" {
> ro
On 09-10-2014 11:23, Justin Mayes wrote:
> In Reyk's presentation he talks about this
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtMxGslqGbM) @ 19:30 and describes the 'link
balancer' functionality of relayd intended to do exactly what I want. It
appears to work as described. In the presentation Reyk says rel
[mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Justin Mayes
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 9:05 AM
To: grazzol...@gmail.com; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Route-to with a dynamic 'next hop'
My understanding of route-to is that if the destination is not on same network
as the 'route-to&#
al Message-
From: Giancarlo Razzolini [mailto:grazzol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 8:52 AM
To: Justin Mayes; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Route-to with a dynamic 'next hop'
On 09-10-2014 10:16, Justin Mayes wrote:
> I did notice the problem with only detecting
On 09-10-2014 10:16, Justin Mayes wrote:
> I did notice the problem with only detecting a LAN failure and was looking
at a better monitor. If I just used plain PF rules what would I use for the
next-hop parameter to the route-to command? This IP is dynamic.
>
There is no next-hop. Just make your r
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:26 AM
To: Justin Mayes; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Route-to with a dynamic 'next hop'
On 09-10-2014 02:58, Justin Mayes wrote:
> Ok I got it working. Here is what I did
>
> Enabled multipath routing (sysctl)
> Added the relayd anchor
ion in the man page for relayd to do what I want.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtMxGslqGbM
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Justin Mayes
> Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:04 PM
> To: misc@open
l show summary' showed it as down and then default
route to it was removed automatically. Awesomeness.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Justin Mayes
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:56 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Route-to
alf Of
Justin Mayes
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:04 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Route-to with a dynamic 'next hop'
Greetings all -
I have 2 internet connections. One of them is static IP, one is dynamic. I want
to use both of them on my gateway. From the man pages and other d
Greetings all -
I have 2 internet connections. One of them is static IP, one is dynamic. I
want to use both of them on my gateway. From the man pages and other docs I
see the use of route-to in the pf.conf including the 'next-hop' that it
requires. This is easy enough. Problem is that the next hop
12 matches
Mail list logo
