reopened this thread to see users interest about have rxvt-unicode on
OpenBSD as official supported application.
-Jesus
fulvio ciriaco escribis:
From: Arun G Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:43:56 +0530
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008
Hi list!
I thought it would be great to have rxvt-unicode on the ports tree, so I
reopened this thread to see users interest about have rxvt-unicode on
OpenBSD as official supported application.
-Jesus
fulvio ciriaco escribis:
From: Arun G Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: aterm, rxvt
On Tue, Apr 22 2008 at 43:22, Arun G Nair wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Claer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personnaly use unicode rxvt. It's a clone of rxvt that comes with
unicode (oh surprising) and with client/server mode to reduce memory
usage when you have serveral terms
On 21/04/08 17:04 -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
Jesus Sanchez wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using 4.2 without problem, and I'm trying to find one xterm to my
personal use with only one thing in mind: low cpu and memory usage.
I have been using mrxvt for years. It's also multi-tabbed. Currently,
I'm
Cesare Gargano escribis:
On 21/04/08 17:04 -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
Jesus Sanchez wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using 4.2 without problem, and I'm trying to find one xterm to my
personal use with only one thing in mind: low cpu and memory usage.
I have been using mrxvt for years. It's also
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Claer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personnaly use unicode rxvt. It's a clone of rxvt that comes with
unicode (oh surprising) and with client/server mode to reduce memory
usage when you have serveral terms like I used to have.
urxvt is also one of the rare
Hi,
AFAIK urxvt isn't ported on OpenBSD. I think it doesn't have stable
release yet.
You can check it out from their repo and compile it yourself. It's not a
hard process.
Timo
Arun G Nair wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Claer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personnaly use
man 1 uxterm
I don't know about the background manipulation, but you can get at
unicode with it.
HTH,
Jim
* Timo Myyr? [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080422 14:35]:
Hi,
AFAIK urxvt isn't ported on OpenBSD. I think it doesn't have stable release
yet.
You can check it out from their repo and compile
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Jim Razmus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
man 1 uxterm
I don't know about the background manipulation, but you can get at
unicode with it.
Yeah I know about uxterm. I was planing to ditch xterm and use
something lighter on memory (though am not quiter sure if
From: Arun G Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:43:56 +0530
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Claer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personnaly use unicode rxvt. It's a clone of rxvt that comes with
unicode (oh surprising) and with client
Hi all,
I'm using 4.2 without problem, and I'm trying to find one xterm to my
personal use with only one thing in mind: low cpu and memory usage.
I discarded xterm because it have some things I don't need and it uses a
lot of memory too.
My two favourite options are aterm and rxvt. I have done
On Mon, Apr 21 2008 at 34:18, Jesus Sanchez wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
I'm using 4.2 without problem, and I'm trying to find one xterm to my
personal use with only one thing in mind: low cpu and memory usage.
I discarded xterm because it have some things I don't need and it uses a
lot of memory
Jesus Sanchez wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using 4.2 without problem, and I'm trying to find one xterm to my
personal use with only one thing in mind: low cpu and memory usage.
I have been using mrxvt for years. It's also multi-tabbed. Currently,
I'm running 10 terminals in a single mrxvt process and
13 matches
Mail list logo
