On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 05:25:18PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote on Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 05:11:57PM +0200:
>
> > I'm posting this here instead of asking directly to groff mailing list
>
> Correct choice.
>
> &
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> No. Pure run-time configuration. Read
>
> /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/groff-1.22.3p2
I am not sure if it is really necessary to change the general groff settings
just to use this settings for man pages. I had the same problem long time ago.
Indeed t
Hi Walter,
Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote on Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 05:11:57PM +0200:
> I'm posting this here instead of asking directly to groff mailing list
Correct choice.
> because (I hate to say it) I can't reproduce this issue in Linux using
> the same groff version (1.
I'm posting this here instead of asking directly to groff mailing list
because (I hate to say it) I can't reproduce this issue in Linux using
the same groff version (1.22.3). I use groff every so often but, if I
remember well, I experienced the same with groff in openbsd years ago.
On 2012-12-06, Yusof Khalid - FreeBSD / OpenBSD wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I just noticed that groff is remove from the ports list, I'm trying to
> install dansguardian to work with my squid proxy. Got the following error :
Can't you just "pkg_add dansguardian"? The
Thank Peter for pointing me that. I just change the Makefile to
USE_GROFF=Yes, that work for me.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:53:42PM +0800, Yusof Khalid - FreeBSD / OpenBSD
> wrote:
>
> > I just noticed that groff is
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:53:42PM +0800, Yusof Khalid - FreeBSD / OpenBSD
wrote:
> I just noticed that groff is remove from the ports list, I'm trying to
> install dansguardian to work with my squid proxy. Got the following error :
Er, no. groff was removed from base, but still liv
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:53:42PM +0800, Yusof Khalid - FreeBSD / OpenBSD
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I just noticed that groff is remove from the ports list, I'm trying to
> install dansguardian to work with my squid proxy. Got the following error :
>
> make install
>
s in late
>> October but I will double check (I can't access machine right now).
>
> Run sysmerge again with a newer etc48.tgz file, the man.conf changes
> didn't go in at exactly the same time as groff was removed from base.
On 2010-11-03, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> I used sysmerge and installed from a snapshot a few times in late
> October but I will double check (I can't access machine right now).
Run sysmerge again with a newer etc48.tgz file, the man.conf changes
didn't go in at exactly the same t
man X
>> man xrandr
>>
>> complain about /usr/bin/nroff not found
>
> That is not a Xenocara problem.
>
>> P.S I deleted /usr/bin/nroff but this issue would be faced by people
>> with new installs.
>
> Did you forget to adjust man.conf(5) before removing groff?
>
> For details, see
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20101019
>
> Yours,
> Ingo
in/nroff but this issue would be faced by people
> with new installs.
Did you forget to adjust man.conf(5) before removing groff?
For details, see
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20101019
Yours,
Ingo
It's running fine here :
$ sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 4.8-current (GENERIC.MP) #495: Sat Oct 30 10:40:20 MDT 2010
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
$
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that groff's remova
Hi,
It seems that groff's removal has not been communicated to xenocara.
man X
man xrandr
complain about /usr/bin/nroff not found
Thanks
P.S I deleted /usr/bin/nroff but this issue would be faced by people
with new installs.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:35:01PM +0100, Pieter Verberne wrote:
>
> Why is Groff not updated? OpenBSD 4.2 has Groff 1.15 from 1999.
> Some compatability issues?
>
someone would need to do the work.
jmc
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:35:01PM +0100, Pieter Verberne wrote:
> Why is Groff not updated? OpenBSD 4.2 has Groff 1.15 from 1999.
> Some compatability issues?
I've been thinking this too, and went ahead and tried doing it...
It's a bit of a pain actually, some problems: the dire
No need for any new features?
Regards,
Andreas
On 18/02/2008, Pieter Verberne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Why is Groff not updated? OpenBSD 4.2 has Groff 1.15 from 1999.
> Some compatability issues?
>
> Pieter (offlist)
>
>
--
Andreas Kahari
Some
Hi folks,
Why is Groff not updated? OpenBSD 4.2 has Groff 1.15 from 1999.
Some compatability issues?
Pieter (offlist)
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 08:11:17AM +0200, Gareth wrote:
> Is there any chance of a newer version of groff (1.18 or 1.19) being
> imported into the tree?
Yes
Is there any chance of a newer version of groff (1.18 or 1.19) being
imported into the tree? If not, would a port with binary names prefixed
with a character like 'n' (to differentiate them from the in-tree
versions) be accepted?
Thanks
Gareth
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:32:28AM -0600, D. E. Evans wrote:
> I notice groff hasn't been updated in 2-3 years. Any particular reason?
someone would need to step up and do the work, if they wanted it...
jmc
I notice groff hasn't been updated in 2-3 years. Any particular reason?
22 matches
Mail list logo