Hi
it seems to me the Myricom 10GB Ethernet devices should be supported by
OpenBSD, according to myx(4) and the What's new page of 5.0
http://www.openbsd.org/50.html#new and actually also 4.2
http://www.openbsd.org/plus42.html
However there are no mention of those cards in the Supported har
In article <4fb37187.4010...@sanity.de>, Marc Peters wrote:
> > You have the disktab file from the i386 arch installed on a amd64
> > system.
>
> i reinstalled the box as i upgraded it and went to amd64 (mid April).
> this was sucked in by my etc-backup. Didn't know, that it would cause
> proble
On 05/16/2012 10:27 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> But you can force a full comparison using `-d' as per sysmerge(8).
>
Solved my problems, thank you all.
marc
On 05/16/2012 10:46 AM, Dan Harnett wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:05:18AM +0200, Marc Peters wrote:
>> /tmp # cat /etc/disktab
>>
>> # $OpenBSD: disktab,v 1.21 2010/10/19 20:23:53 deraadt Exp $
>>
>> floppy288|3in|3.5in High Density Floppy, 2.88MB:\
>> :dt=floppy:ty=floppy:se#51
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:05:18AM +0200, Marc Peters wrote:
> /tmp # cat /etc/disktab
>
> # $OpenBSD: disktab,v 1.21 2010/10/19 20:23:53 deraadt Exp $
>
> floppy288|3in|3.5in High Density Floppy, 2.88MB:\
> :dt=floppy:ty=floppy:se#512:nt#2:rm#300:ns#36:nc#80:\
> :pa#5760:oa
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:05:18AM +0200, Marc Peters wrote:
> On 05/15/2012 05:43 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:35:59AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 17:03, Marc Peters wrote:
> >>> Hi list,
> >>>
> >>> i am trying to built a 5.1 release whic
On 05/15/2012 05:43 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:35:59AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 17:03, Marc Peters wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> i am trying to built a 5.1 release which fails at
>>
>>> disklabel -w vnd0 floppy576
>>> disklabel: unknown disk t
Marc Peters wrote:
> i am trying to built a 5.1 release which fails at
> disklabel: unknown disk type: floppy576
There's something wrong with your /etc/disktab. Maybe you didn't
update your /etc files with sysmerge after running an upgrade from
the install media.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisger
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:35:59AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 17:03, Marc Peters wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > i am trying to built a 5.1 release which fails at
>
> > disklabel -w vnd0 floppy576
> > disklabel: unknown disk type: floppy576
>
> Your /etc/disklabel is missin
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 17:03, Marc Peters wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> i am trying to built a 5.1 release which fails at
> disklabel -w vnd0 floppy576
> disklabel: unknown disk type: floppy576
Your /etc/disklabel is missing something.
Hi list,
i am trying to built a 5.1 release which fails at
ld -Ttext 0x801001e0 -e start --warn-common -S -x -o bsd
${SYSTEM_HEAD} vers.o ${OBJS}
textdatabss dec hex
4375184 2386680 504624 7266488 6ee0b8
cp
/usr/src/distrib/amd64/ramdisk_cd/../../../sys/arch/amd64/compile
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am resurrecting this thread which I followed carefully because I need
> some hardware advice for the firewall machine which is going to serve
> our new scientific computing laboratory. Initially behind this
On 10.5.2012 3:28, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am resurrecting this thread which I followed carefully because I need
> some hardware advice for the firewall machine which is going to serve
> our new scientific computing laboratory. Initially behind this firewall,
On 2012-05-10, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> I would like to hear opinion about:
>
> Dell PowerEdge R210 II Ultra-compact Rack Server
These work fine, quite nice machines.
> I am looking at the one with
>
> Intel Gigabit ET Quad Port Adapter, Gigabit Ethernet NIC, PCIe x4
I think these are 82576
Dear All,
I am resurrecting this thread which I followed carefully because I need
some hardware advice for the firewall machine which is going to serve
our new scientific computing laboratory. Initially behind this firewall,
we will have only two small (16 and 8 nodes) clusters, a GPU based super
Hello,
I have an old hardware using OpenBSD and installing from snapshots
gives me this kernel stop. The dmesg from a working version, output
messages and details are at this link:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=132741797807073&w=2
There is no kernel panic, it is just a kernel stop.
On 2012-04-17, Marcin wrote:
> * at least one/preferably two PCI-X slots to add one dual/couple of single
> fibre network cards
usually PCIE on anything modern
> * IPMI 2.0 with out of band management
if rs232 isn't enough, you want one with a dedicated nic on a
secure management network.
> I
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 21:04 CEST, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:39:56AM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 09:35 CEST, Henning Brauer
> > wrote:
> >
> > > * Marcin [2012-04-17 08:59]:
>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:39:56AM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 09:35 CEST, Henning Brauer
> wrote:
>
> > * Marcin [2012-04-17 08:59]:
> > > I am looking for a hardware recommendation for a new OpenBSD based
> > > firewa
On 17/04/2012 08:35, Henning Brauer wrote:
I'm very happy with Supermicro X9SC* based systems, with Xeon E3-1220
and an Intel SSD. Check with your local supplier for exact model
options. Superior performance, 35W idle, no trouble whatsoever, fair
pricing.
+1
Have a pair of X9SCM-F-O with E31230
* Marcin [2012-04-17 18:11]:
> On 17 April 2012 09:35, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Marcin [2012-04-17 08:59]:
> > > What I am after:
> > > * 2 sockets,
> > what for? unless you run extremely heavy userland proxies, you don't
> > get much (any) benefit, especially given that the one-socket machin
On 17 April 2012 09:35, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Marcin [2012-04-17 08:59]:
> > What I am after:
> > * 2 sockets,
>
> what for? unless you run extremely heavy userland proxies, you don't
> get much (any) benefit, especially given that the one-socket machines
> are all 4core now.
>
Fair point.
nto ddb. Otherwise yes, serial console would suffice, even
> > > rebooting from
> > > within ddb. I hope it may not happen at all, but who knows, hardware may
> > > be faulty, and
> > > weird things may happen ;)
> >
> > I use seperate power controller
within ddb. I hope it may not happen at all, but who knows, hardware may be
> > faulty, and
> > weird things may happen ;)
>
> I use seperate power controllers.
i use the ipmi to reboot/power-cycle and monitoring PSUs. The IPMI SOL
console on the supermicros has problems
[2012-04-17 08:59]:
> > > > > I am looking for a hardware recommendation for a new OpenBSD based
> > > > > firewalls. So far I have been using IBM x336s, but they are slowly
> > > > > approaching end of life.
> > > > > What I am after:
>
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 10:47 CEST, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> * Sebastian Reitenbach [2012-04-17 10:40]:
> > On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 09:35 CEST, Henning Brauer
> > wrote:
> >
> > > * Marcin [2012-04-17 08:59]:
> > > > I am looking for a
* Sebastian Reitenbach [2012-04-17 10:40]:
> On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 09:35 CEST, Henning Brauer
> wrote:
>
> > * Marcin [2012-04-17 08:59]:
> > > I am looking for a hardware recommendation for a new OpenBSD based
> > > firewalls. So far I have been usi
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 09:35 CEST, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> * Marcin [2012-04-17 08:59]:
> > I am looking for a hardware recommendation for a new OpenBSD based
> > firewalls. So far I have been using IBM x336s, but they are slowly
> > approaching end of life.
>
* Marcin [2012-04-17 08:59]:
> I am looking for a hardware recommendation for a new OpenBSD based
> firewalls. So far I have been using IBM x336s, but they are slowly
> approaching end of life.
>
> What I am after:
> * 1U i386/amd64 server,
> * 2 sockets,
what for? unl
>
> I am looking for a hardware recommendation for a new OpenBSD based
> firewalls. So far I have been using IBM x336s, but they are slowly
> approaching end of life.
>
> What I am after:
> * 1U i386/amd64 server,
> * 2 sockets,
> * RAID 1 SAS/SATA controller (2 hard dri
Hello,
I am looking for a hardware recommendation for a new OpenBSD based
firewalls. So far I have been using IBM x336s, but they are slowly
approaching end of life.
What I am after:
* 1U i386/amd64 server,
* 2 sockets,
* RAID 1 SAS/SATA controller (2 hard drives are enough)
* decent dual LAN
At 17:29 +0200 on 2012-04-14, Benny Lofgren wrote:
> On 2012-04-12 22.23, Richard Johnson wrote:
>> Is there any particular reason the ARC-1212-4i or ARC-1223-8i will not work
>> with OpenBSD 5.1 and newer's arc(4) driver? (Will arc(4) deal with Areca's
>> generically named RAID-on-chip (ROC), lis
On 2012-04-12 22.23, Richard Johnson wrote:
> We're looking at Areca ARC-1213-4i or ARC-1223-8i [1] cards for doing RAID
> 5, 6 or 10 arrays. http://www.areca.com.tw/products/sas6g_internal.htm
>
> They're not listed on the OpenBSD-current man page for arc(4). They're
> reported by some to be ess
We're looking at Areca ARC-1213-4i or ARC-1223-8i [1] cards for doing RAID
5, 6 or 10 arrays. http://www.areca.com.tw/products/sas6g_internal.htm
They're not listed on the OpenBSD-current man page for arc(4). They're
reported by some to be essentially the same as the long-discontinued
ARC-1210/12
On 2012/04/05 22:02, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> Yes, clear. I think I will add R610 to the options. The only remaining
> question is PERC H200 support. It is not mentioned in mfi(4), so should I
> consider it unsupported?
this is an H200:
$ ssh mh3-pl7 dmesg|grep -e Dell -e mpii
bios0: vendor Del
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 21:02, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> The only remaining question is PERC H200 support.
mpii(4) should cover the Dell PERC H200.
ly distributed. I was thinking SSD disks to avoid mechanical
parts but DELL prices for them are obsurd I think.
>
> So your choice is between hardware which should already work in
> OpenBSD and hardware which (at least the nics) is known not to
> work yet but might work sometime in t
> So your choice is between hardware which should already work in
> OpenBSD and hardware which (at least the nics) is known not to
> work yet but might work sometime in the future. Nobody here can
> make that decision for you :)
Last time such issues happened, the people involved made
On 2012-04-04, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> we are about to engage a procurement procedure of servers. There is a
> high probability to purchase DELL hardware. I want OpenBSD to be
> supported on the hardware. I have 2 broad options
>
> - Go with PowerEdge R410
Dell has an ugly habit of changing components even within the same
model year of hardware. You can't predict how well supported something
is based on "PowerEdge R410" until you have your specific one in front
of you.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
>
Hello all,
we are about to engage a procurement procedure of servers. There is a
high probability to purchase DELL hardware. I want OpenBSD to be
supported on the hardware. I have 2 broad options
- Go with PowerEdge R410
- Go with PowerEdge R620 (latest generation of servers)
The first option
Dewey Hylton wrote:
> i know that the alix has hardware crypto supporting aes-128-cbc. one thing
> that was unclear to me was, on the openbsd ipsec side, whether
> aes == aes-128 == aes-128-cbc ... my assumption was YES, after seeing that
Yes.
> aes/aes-128 are both 3 times faster
- Original Message -
> From: "Ted Unangst"
> To: "Stuart Henderson"
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 7:42:01 PM
> Subject: Re: openbsd / ipsec / hardware
>
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> i
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> i'm using a simple scp of a 100MB file. scp reports its transmission
>> speed. and i'm comparing the same transmission of the same file between
>> the same two hosts with and without vpn encryption. it may not be
>> the best or most accurate measurem
On 2012/04/02 17:11, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> >> i'm using a simple scp of a 100MB file. scp reports its transmission
> >> speed. and i'm comparing the same transmission of the same file between
> >> the same two hosts with and without vpn encryption. it may not be
> >> the best or mos
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-04-02, Dewey Hylton wrote:
>>>From: Stuart Henderson spacehopper.org>
>>>Subject: Re: openbsd / ipsec / hardware
>>>Newsgroups: gmane.os.openbsd.misc
>>>Date: 2012-03-31 21:39:14 GMT
On 2012-04-02, Dewey Hylton wrote:
>>From: Stuart Henderson spacehopper.org>
>>Subject: Re: openbsd / ipsec / hardware
>>Newsgroups: gmane.os.openbsd.misc
>>Date: 2012-03-31 21:39:14 GMT (1 day, 22 hours and 53 minutes ago)
>>On 2012-03-30, Dewey Hylton gmail.
> as well as your bandwidth measuring method?
You may also look at tcpbench, which is in base. It's not on the Alix
box because I'm using a stripped down flashboot image... I just grabbed
the first thing that came to mind and installed it, which happened to be
iperf.
--
James Shupe
> would you mind posting your (sanitized) openvpn configuration, as well
> as your bandwidth measuring method?
>
> i attempted this today and am seeing much less than 14Mbps. i'm probably
> not measuring the same way, however, as i'm using a simple scp which
> obviously has its own overhead - but
>From: Stuart Henderson spacehopper.org>
>Subject: Re: openbsd / ipsec / hardware
>Newsgroups: gmane.os.openbsd.misc
>Date: 2012-03-31 21:39:14 GMT (1 day, 22 hours and 53 minutes ago)
>On 2012-03-30, Dewey Hylton gmail.com> wrote:
>> i'm getting ready to imple
- Original Message -
> From: "James Shupe"
> To: "Dewey Hylton"
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 4:40:23 PM
> Subject: Re: openbsd / ipsec / hardware
>
> On 03/30/2012 03:16 PM, Dewey Hylton wrote:
> > i'm getting ready to implement a few n
On 2012-03-30 22:16, Dewey Hylton wrote:
i'm getting ready to implement a few new site-to-site vpns using
openbsd, and am on the hunt for appropriate hardware. i have several
alix (geode) and lanner (intel atom) boxes working wonderfully as
firewalls and routers, but neither type are ab
On 2012-03-30, Dewey Hylton wrote:
> i'm getting ready to implement a few new site-to-site vpns using
> openbsd, and am on the hunt for appropriate hardware. i have several
> alix (geode) and lanner (intel atom) boxes working wonderfully as
> firewalls and routers, but neither
> I don't see the point with setting kern.usercrypto=1, all support for enc/dec
> you get already from the hw+kernel.
> IPSec stack already used the HW if supported, else you get software based
> enc/dec.
>
> //mxb
I replied to my original email about 45 seconds after I wrote it,
pointing that ou
On Mar 30, 2012, at 10:16 PM, Dewey Hylton wrote:
> i'm getting ready to implement a few new site-to-site vpns using openbsd,
and am on the hunt for appropriate hardware. i have several alix (geode) and
lanner (intel atom) boxes working wonderfully as firewalls and routers, but
neither
On Mar 30, 2012, at 10:42 PM, James Shupe wrote:
> On 03/30/2012 03:16 PM, Dewey Hylton wrote:
>> i'm getting ready to implement a few new site-to-site vpns using openbsd,
> and am on the hunt for appropriate hardware. i have several alix (geode)
and
> lanner (intel
On 03/30/2012 03:16 PM, Dewey Hylton wrote:
> i'm getting ready to implement a few new site-to-site vpns using openbsd,
and am on the hunt for appropriate hardware. i have several alix (geode) and
lanner (intel atom) boxes working wonderfully as firewalls and routers, but
neither type are
On 03/30/2012 03:16 PM, Dewey Hylton wrote:
> i'm getting ready to implement a few new site-to-site vpns using openbsd,
and am on the hunt for appropriate hardware. i have several alix (geode) and
lanner (intel atom) boxes working wonderfully as firewalls and routers, but
neither type are
i'm getting ready to implement a few new site-to-site vpns using openbsd, and
am on the hunt for appropriate hardware. i have several alix (geode) and lanner
(intel atom) boxes working wonderfully as firewalls and routers, but neither
type are able to provide enough throughput when ips
Sorry for the line noise.
Christopher Down writes:
> Hello,
Hi.
> ath0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR5424" rev 0x01: apic 4 int 18
> ath0: AR5424 14.2 phy 7.0 rf 0.0, WOR5_ETSIC, address 00:23:4d:14:14:82
The problem probably lies in these two lines, imho at least the radio isn't
properl
Argh, fscking MUA, sorry. Preparing an unmangled mail right now.
--
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
GPG fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494
Christopher Down writes:
Hello,
Hi.
ath0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR5424" rev 0x01: apic
4 int 18 ath0: AR5424 14.2 phy 7.0 rf 0.0, WOR5_ETSIC, address
00:23:4d:14:14:82
The problem probably lies in these two lines, imho at least the
radio isn't properly detected (the "rf 0.0"
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Down
wrote:
>
> I have read conflicting reports about OpenBSD's support for this chip.
> If it is not supported (yet), is there a practical way for me to help
> (bearing in mind that I am not experienced with driver programming on
> OpenBSD at this poin
evice to connect to my home network, the ath driver
returns "unable to reset hardware" and a HAL status code.
The man page for ath gives the ominous "this should not happen" notice
and points to the source at /sys/dev/ic/ar5xxx.h, but the HAL status
codes that are returned
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 05:13:25PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> [..]
> PS: I'm ready to change my opinion about Broadcom by 1800, for just a
> couple of PDF uploads on their website...
A stripped datasheet has been released:
http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/615
Direct dl:
http://dmkenr5gtnd8f.
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:41:42 +0100, Lars wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi
It's called viral marketing, PR, social crap whatever. Raspberry Pi
foundation claims something about support for schools and
blahblahblah, but in fact was created but one of engineers of
Broadcom. It's
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Lars wrote:
> Anon wrote:
>> Obviously you don't live in a 3rd world country. I do and nothing is 50
>> bucks here except the women. Nobody throws anything out except dead cats
>> and PCs cost about 350 USD for a new build based on 3-5 year old NOS parts
>> the Amer
Anon wrote:
> Obviously you don't live in a 3rd world country. I do and nothing is 50
> bucks here except the women. Nobody throws anything out except dead cats
> and PCs cost about 350 USD for a new build based on 3-5 year old NOS parts
> the Americans dumped on the market after they went obsolete
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:11:33PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> the list on the website for supported hardware just points to the man
> pages. although man pages for wireless drivers do have lists of
> supported models, athn(4) doesn't. it simply lists supported chipset
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:00:48PM +0100, Markus Schatzl wrote:
> On Thu, 02 16:08 , Jason McIntyre wrote:
> ...
> > > high range). Appending it to the list of supported hardware would
> > > make sense.
> ...
> >
> > which "list of supported har
On Thu, 02 16:08 , Jason McIntyre wrote:
...
> > high range). Appending it to the list of supported hardware would
> > make sense.
...
>
> which "list of supported hardware" are you referring to? this chipset is
> already listed as supported in athn(4).
Pardon
ngly well in -current, I'm
> tempted to outright recommend it (amongst others because of its
> high range). Appending it to the list of supported hardware would
> make sense.
>
> Problems I reported with this card went away with the patches
> stsp@ commited recently BTW.
>
high range). Appending it to the list of supported hardware would
make sense.
Problems I reported with this card went away with the patches
stsp@ commited recently BTW.
Here are the facts:
athn0 at pci7 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR9281" rev 0x01: apic 0 int 17
athn0: AR9280 rev 2 (2T2R), ROM r
> What's so funny is that they put GNU/Linux on it, when gNU is supposed to
> be about FREE dom. LOL. Fucking LOL.
That's perfect. GNU has nothing to do with free, it has to do with butt
fucking people until they become ASSimilated. Sounds like a match.
> For poor people in third world countries
These days we have cheap good low power intels. The pentium core g620t for
instance idles at less than 25w. If you want to go cheaper, amd brazos is
nice too but not so power effective.
On Feb 2, 2012 1:02 AM, "Lars" wrote:
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi
> >
> > It's called viral
ggestions - if you haven't tried it and loved it,
> don't bother mentioning it.
>>
>> i'm hoping the raspberrypi will eventually be supported on openbsd (if the
> hardware proves to be stable, $35 sounds GREAT) but i don't have the skills to
> go there mysel
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi
>
> It's called viral marketing, PR, social crap whatever. Raspberry Pi
> foundation claims something about support for schools and
> blahblahblah, but in fact was created but one of engineers of
> Broadcom. It's just test bed for their proprietary crap
* corey clingo [2012-01-31 04:08]:
> If you don't need the environmental exclusion case, I recall reading
> some good reviews of reasonably-priced Supermicro Atom-based systems
> on this list - low power but they seem to look and feel like real
> servers (even have IPMI and such).
correct.
> Sti
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Lars wrote:
> If someone is considering doing openbsd ports for raspberry pi devices,
> they might want to look at freebsd as a starting point, instead of linux.
>
> But it doesn't look that great, lots of undocumented crap with pi:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pip
If someone is considering doing openbsd ports for raspberry pi devices,
they might want to look at freebsd as a starting point, instead of linux.
But it doesn't look that great, lots of undocumented crap with pi:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-November/036754.html
I don'
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Dewey Hylton wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "corey clingo"
>> To: misc@openbsd.org
>> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 7:05:17 PM
>> Subject: Re: looking for hardware recommendations, x86 or otherwise.
>>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:24:49AM -0500, Dewey Hylton wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Theo de Raadt"
> > To: "Dewey Hylton"
> > Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> > Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 6:32:21 PM
> > Subject: Re: l
- Original Message -
> From: "corey clingo"
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 7:05:17 PM
> Subject: Re: looking for hardware recommendations, x86 or otherwise.
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Dewey Hylton
> wrote:
> > if
- Original Message -
> From: "Theo de Raadt"
> To: "Dewey Hylton"
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 6:32:21 PM
> Subject: Re: looking for hardware recommendations, x86 or otherwise.
>
> > i'm hoping the raspberryp
aspberrypi will eventually be supported on openbsd (if the
hardware proves to be stable, $35 sounds GREAT) but i don't have the skills to
go there myself.
>
Alixes are pretty cheap. Not Sheevaplug or RasberryPi cheap, but cheap
for the capabilities they have. I mean, at the end of the
> i'm hoping the raspberrypi will eventually be supported on openbsd
> (if the hardware proves to be stable, $35 sounds GREAT) but i don't
> have the skills to go there myself.
Wow. Dream on. It is a mess of firmware. You know nothing of our
history?
o
systems, and just as stable, while being cheaper. and i'm looking for
recommendations, not just suggestions - if you haven't tried it and loved it,
don't bother mentioning it.
i'm hoping the raspberrypi will eventually be supported on openbsd (if the
hardware proves to be s
sd.org/loongson.html
> >
> > Relevant threads on misc@:
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&w=2&r=1&s=lemote&q=b
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&w=2&r=1&s=loongson&q=b
> >
> > Acquiring hardware:
> >
> > International
helps, but searching for "lemote" does wonders.
>
> Start reading here:
> http://openbsd.org/loongson.html
>
> Relevant threads on misc@:
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&w=2&r=1&s=lemote&q=b
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&w=2&r=1&s=loon
Thanks and HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYBODY
quot;lemote" does wonders.
Start reading here:
http://openbsd.org/loongson.html
Relevant threads on misc@:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&w=2&r=1&s=lemote&q=b
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&w=2&r=1&s=loongson&q=b
Acquiring hardware:
International:
http://
nel panics during installation process. And on the same
hardware Debian-5 works fine for years - or better "worked" as we're
uninstalling these old servers now due to the energy consumption to
keep them running.
RU,
Tobias.
> I am moving soon and want to take that opportunity to get rid of some
> old hardware I either don't need anymore or don't have the space for.
>
> All items are located in Germany, about an hour drive north of Frankfurt.
>
> 1x 19" Schroff rack
> - 2x door, 1
Hi all,
I am moving soon and want to take that opportunity to get rid of some
old hardware I either don't need anymore or don't have the space for.
All items are located in Germany, about an hour drive north of Frankfurt.
1x 19" Schroff rack
- 2x door, 1 key
- 2x side wall
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 04:03:48PM +0200, BARDOU Pierre wrote:
> I'm looking for hardware capable of doing 1bgps IPsec, under OpenBSD
> of course. Do you think it is possible with a brand new high end
> server and their new instructions (AES/NI and/or AVX) ?
Currently I don
Hello,
I'm looking for hardware capable of doing 1bgps IPsec, under OpenBSD of
course.
Do you think it is possible with a brand new high end server and their new
instructions (AES/NI and/or AVX) ?
Or would a crypto card be necessary ? If yes, do you have a brand/model to
recommend ?
I
> I actually realised that I had a Edimax EW-7811Un (urtwn(4)), which I
> use all the time on my i386 netbook. Under zaurus/5.0 this turns up as
> a ugen0 :(
For some reason, urtwn* at uhub? isn't in the zaurus GENERIC kernel config.
-Bryan.
On 10 August 2011 11:23, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> I actually realised that I had a Edimax EW-7811Un (urtwn(4)), which I
>> use all the time on my i386 netbook. Under zaurus/5.0 this turns up as
>> a ugen0 :(
>
> that's not enough details to be a useful report - make sure you're
> using a powered
On 2011/08/10 11:16, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 9 August 2011 20:56, Dale Rahn wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 12:50:34PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> >> Has anyone tried something like this under openbsd?
> >>
> >> http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/TRENDnet-10-100-Mbps-CompactFlash-Fast-Ethernet-Adapter-/
On 9 August 2011 20:56, Dale Rahn wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 12:50:34PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
>> Has anyone tried something like this under openbsd?
>>
>>
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/TRENDnet-10-100-Mbps-CompactFlash-Fast-Ethernet-Ada
pter-/330598595618?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item4cf93
801 - 900 of 2101 matches
Mail list logo
