Re: 4.3: netstat question

2008-06-14 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sat, 14.06.2008 at 01:39:29 +0200, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope. That is not the problem. The main issues is that a full view will need a lot of memory for the sysctl. This memory needs to be available as real memory because it is wired into the kernel. If you run bgpd

Re: 4.3: netstat question

2008-06-14 Thread Henning Brauer
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-14 11:29]: Would it be possible to walk along the live table, without copying the table, or would the continuous stream of route inserts and deletes lead to a corrupted view and/or access to the wrong parts of the system's memory (which must to be

Re: 4.3: netstat question

2008-06-14 Thread David Higgs
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-14 11:29]: Would it be possible to walk along the live table, without copying the table, or would the continuous stream of route inserts and deletes lead to a corrupted view

Re: 4.3: netstat question

2008-06-14 Thread Henning Brauer
* David Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-15 01:59]: On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-14 11:29]: Would it be possible to walk along the live table, without copying the table, or would the continuous stream of

Re: 4.3: netstat question

2008-06-14 Thread David Higgs
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * David Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-15 01:59]: On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-14 11:29]: Would it be possible to walk along the

Re: 4.3: netstat question

2008-06-14 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:55:52PM -0400, David Higgs wrote: On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * David Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-15 01:59]: On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Toni Mueller [EMAIL

Re: 4.3: netstat question

2008-06-13 Thread Philip Guenther
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of my machines: # netstat -rnf inet netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot allocate memory netstat -r dumps the routing table by calling sysctl()

Re: 4.3: netstat question

2008-06-13 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 04:20:45PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of my machines: # netstat -rnf inet netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot

Re: 4.3: netstat question

2008-06-13 Thread Philip Guenther
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Nope. That is not the problem. The main issues is that a full view will need a lot of memory for the sysctl. This memory needs to be available as real memory because it is wired into the kernel. If you run bgpd with

4.3: netstat question

2008-06-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of my machines: # netstat -rnf inet netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot allocate memory This machine receives two full feeds @ ~255k routes each. Any idea about how to combat this, please? Kind regards, --Toni++

Re: 4.3: netstat question

2008-06-12 Thread Pierre Riteau
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:47:25AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: Hi, as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of my machines: # netstat -rnf inet netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot allocate memory This machine receives two full feeds @ ~255k routes each.

Re: netstat question

2007-11-23 Thread Marcus Andree
Connections listed as in close_wait state weren't closed in full sync and may have data still waiting to be processed. snip but what does it mean when a connection in CLOSE_WAIT has packets in the Recv-Q? how can that be? -f -- what we do not understand we do not possess. -- goethe

netstat question

2007-11-23 Thread frantisek holop
hi there, i have a question regarding netstat output. Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state) tcp 163 0 195.168.92.92.7054 aa.bb.cc.dd.23001 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 101 0 195.168.92.92.7503

Re: netstat question

2007-06-18 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:17:55PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: hi there, this is a 4.1 release notebook system. amaaq netstat -naf inet Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state) ip 0 0 *.*

Re: netstat question

2007-06-17 Thread Philip Guenther
On 6/16/07, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: amaaq netstat -naf inet Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state) ip 0 0 *.**.*17 ... i really can't wrap

netstat question

2007-06-16 Thread frantisek holop
hi there, this is a 4.1 release notebook system. amaaq netstat -naf inet Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state) ip 0 0 *.**.*17 Active Internet connections