Just testing; sorry for inconvenience.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-current of course.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:25:04PM +0200, NetOne - Doichin Dokov wrote:
> Is this for -current only, or you need testing on 4.2 too?
>
> Marco Peereboom :
>> Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if you
>> see thi
Source only.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:24:00PM +0100, Nick Nauwelaerts wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:44:02 -0600
> Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if
> > you see this in the dmesg:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:44:02 -0600
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if
> you see this in the dmesg: store from field!!
Is this in any recent snapshots or source only?
And I have the same question for the
Is this for -current only, or you need testing on 4.2 too?
Marco Peereboom P=P0P?P8QP0:
Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if you
see this in the dmesg: store from field!!
If you see this panic or something similar:
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SLIC HPET APIC MCFG
Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if you
see this in the dmesg: store from field!!
If you see this panic or something similar:
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SLIC HPET APIC MCFG TCPA SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT
SSDT
wrong setbufint type
2ca8 Called: \\_SB_.C003.C098.C155
arg0
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 01:14 -0800, Jake Conk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have pfsync setup between two servers and they're connected to each
The command that you're look for is:
$ sudo netstat -s state | grep -A 17 pfsync
pfsync:
0 packets received (IPv4)
0 packets received (IPv6)
On Dec 2, 2007, at 4:14 AM, Jake Conk wrote:
Hello,
I have pfsync setup between two servers and they're connected to each
other through a cross over cable just as suggested in the faq. Now how
do I test to make sure its working probably and rules and states are
being synced up? I hav
Jake Conk P=P0P?P8QP0:
Hello,
I have pfsync setup between two servers and they're connected to each
other through a cross over cable just as suggested in the faq. Now how
do I test to make sure its working probably and rules and states are
being synced up? I have ftp-proxy setup so
Hello,
I have pfsync setup between two servers and they're connected to each
other through a cross over cable just as suggested in the faq. Now how
do I test to make sure its working probably and rules and states are
being synced up? I have ftp-proxy setup so if I connect to an a ftp
s
Roberto Andradas Izquierdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> evolution's filters test. sorry
received twice.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set
evolution's filters test. sorry
--
Roberto Andradas Izquierdo | Libre Software Engineering Lab
randradas [EMAIL PROTECTED] gsyc.escet.urjc.es| Grupo de Sistemas y
Comunicaciones
Tel: (+34) 91 488 81 05 | Edif. Departamental II - Despacho 119
http://www.randrada
eee
I expect it's old, old news to those with more shell scripting scars: but
the results of the [ -e ] test are at variance with my allegedly reasonable
reading of the documentation.
For all three of sh, ksh, and the /bin/test manpages, the description of the
-e test reads "file exists&qu
for testing proposes i installed a current snapshoot. i saw
the announcement of the netbean pkg thus i complied jdk 1.5
and installed netbeans.
when i build/run a project the output in the output/console
of netbeans is mostly not readable. it prints targets like
init:
deps-jar:
but the ou
test
Ce message est au format HTML. Si vous ne parvenez pas ` le lire, cliquez
ici.
Offre riservie ` anciens materiaux renovation de normandie,
M51KWOKP17
[IMAGE] Je souhaite recevoir des informations et offres promotionnelles `
cette adresse e-mail (misc@openbsd.org) de la part de Welcome Office.
C
hi,
Geoff Steckel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've mangled the lm78 driver into a Fintek F71805 sensor driver.
> If anyone else has a board using this chip I'd appreciate a test of it.
i've built a kernel using your drivers. sensor output and dmesg (attached
below) look
IBM changed their entire (almost) lineup of X-series servers. It seems
that most of the SCSI/SAS variants now have ServeRAID/Adaptec chips,
which makes them unusable on OpenBSD. X3455, oddly, has an LSI1064 SAS
and should work fine.
Just to correct myself. x3200 and x3250 (both available with ei
IBM changed their entire (almost) lineup of X-series servers. It seems
that most of the SCSI/SAS variants now have ServeRAID/Adaptec chips,
which makes them unusable on OpenBSD. X3455, oddly, has an LSI1064 SAS
and should work fine.
Anyways, I got my hands on one with SATA. And it just works. Eve
I've mangled the lm78 driver into a Fintek F71805 sensor driver.
If anyone else has a board using this chip I'd appreciate a test of it.
The files are at http://www.oat.com/ot/fintek/
Here's the output from sysctl:
store:gwes {32} sy
sp, ATTR_OPTIONAL,
> > ATTR_CLUSTER_LIST,
> > + p, len) == -1)
> > + fatalx("attr_optadd failed but
> > impossible");
> > + free(p);
> >} else if (attr_opt
} else if (attr_optadd(asp, ATTR_OPTIONAL,
> ATTR_CLUSTER_LIST,
>&conf->clusterid, sizeof(conf->clusterid)) == -1)
>fatalx("attr_optadd failed but impossible");
> Index: rde.h
> ==
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:19:44PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > > On 05/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > On a side note, at this s
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > On 05/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > On a side note, at this stage I did:
> > >
> > > cr211-FRA# bgpctl reload
> > > reload request sent.
> >
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> On 05/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > On a side note, at this stage I did:
> >
> > cr211-FRA# bgpctl reload
> > reload request sent.
> > cr211-FRA#
> >
> > on the neighbor cr212-FRA I get this:
> >
> > Apr 5
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> After a jug of coffee I tried being a bit more methodical.
>
> I took the entire network down and brought up one router at a time.
> I monitored the prefix 192.168.30.0/24 from a route-collector sitting on
> 192.168.30.10,
> the first rout
After a jug of coffee I tried being a bit more methodical.
I took the entire network down and brought up one router at a time.
I monitored the prefix 192.168.30.0/24 from a route-collector sitting on
192.168.30.10,
the first router brought online was ar213-FRA which has 192.168.30.0/24 as
connecte
test. ignore.
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which
had a name of smime.p7s]
should be fixed in -current by damien.
Indeed. Just tried with if_nfe.c (r1.47). 0 interrupts/seconds without
activity. Also, under the stress test, "systat vmstat" shows around
55% system idle (r1.47). Previously, it was 0% (r1.45).
> > 3) nfe(4) stops responding during stre
t; (transmitter box, Dell SC1425, dual em/gigabit)
> (receiver box, Sun X2100, nfe/gigabit)
> (both connected to a Dell PowerConnect 2708 gigabit switch)
>
> # netperf -H 192.168.0.60 -l 300 -- -s 64K -m 64K -M 64K -S 64K
> TCP STREAM TEST to 192.168.0.60
> Recv SendSend
gured normally
3) nfe(4) stops responding during stress-testing with netperf
(transmitter box, Dell SC1425, dual em/gigabit)
(receiver box, Sun X2100, nfe/gigabit)
(both connected to a Dell PowerConnect 2708 gigabit switch)
# netperf -H 192.168.0.60 -l 300 -- -s 64K -m 64K -M 64K -S 64K
TCP STREAM TE
Damn, talk about "beeing unlucky". My test came 1 day before the new
patch. I started to look into this myself. I guess Brad beat me to it.
Great work, less work for me :)
I'll update the OSCL. Thanks to Daniel as well for testing.
On 2/1/06, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ound 200kb/sec and you simply delay "watchdog timeout".
Not anymore. All was corrected today and I can now saturate my switch
bug time! I even need to put my hands on a Gb switch to actually test
with higher speed as the switch is the bottleneck at the moment. Same
for the watchdog
Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
Again, some bad news. This time, bge(4) is acting up. It seems like
BCM5780 is not configured properly resulting in "bge0: watchdog
timeout -- resetting" kernel messages even with light network
activity. Forcing media settings helps a bit; performance drops to
around 200kb/
Again, some bad news. This time, bge(4) is acting up. It seems like
BCM5780 is not configured properly resulting in "bge0: watchdog
timeout -- resetting" kernel messages even with light network
activity. Forcing media settings helps a bit; performance drops to
around 200kb/sec and you simply delay
rd controller is certainly not on the riser
> (which doesn't work) as I was able to install on it.
ciss(8) first appeared in 3.8, so you must be running an older 380
variant (not the G4 og G4P) on 3.5. And I agree, 3.8 will probably run
on 380 G4/G4P with the onboard RAID controller. The versi
Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
I finally got a hold of a new Sun X4200 Opetron server. Bad news for
anybody how likes Sun hardware: our mpt(8) driver doesn't support the
SAS/SCSI controller resulting in no go condition. Everything else
seems to work.
OSCL (OpenBSD Server Compatibilty List) is updated wi
I finally got a hold of a new Sun X4200 Opetron server. Bad news for
anybody how likes Sun hardware: our mpt(8) driver doesn't support the
SAS/SCSI controller resulting in no go condition. Everything else
seems to work.
OSCL (OpenBSD Server Compatibilty List) is updated with this
information. Find
On 12/13/05, Bruno Carnazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to know if there is a way to deeply test a POSIX operating
> system, and especially OpenBSD. The goal is to estimate the platform
> stability (performance estimation is not required). Tests should
> covert
Hi all,
I'd like to know if there is a way to deeply test a POSIX operating
system, and especially OpenBSD. The goal is to estimate the platform
stability (performance estimation is not required). Tests should
covert POSIX syscalls, OpenBSD specifics (drivers, etc...). For
example, I ha
Dear Juuso:
Searching over the internet, I found an e-mail about some performance
test
you run with PPPoE over OpenBSD. This e-mail is dated Dec 2, 2002. Currently
I'm installing some PPPoE access servers in the headquarters of a client of
mine. This client now is requesting us
Just a test. Last few messages never came through...
--
Darrin Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stilyagin.com/
Testing new config.
--
The only way to keep your health is to eat what you don't want, drink
what you don't like, and do what you'd rather not.
- Mark Twain
Thanks Anil, these specs are very detailed and useful.
But again, if anyone has any clue on any functional
test suite on any BSD OS to test the entire set of
standard socket() related API calls including bind(),
listen(), accept() etc, it saves a lot of my effort.
Currently I am going to through
APIs are pretty complex and hard to test. In
fact, they've only just been specified at all; Peter Sewell and co.
published an entire book about it:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/pes20/Netsem/alldoc.pdf
His recent SIGCOMM paper is more digestible:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/pe
Hi, do any of you know of any functional test suites
to run on any BSD os, to test its sockets related
APIs.
I am looking for something to test the entire set of
standard socket() related API calls such as socket(),
bind(), listen(), accept() etc.
Preferably, it goes through different possible
On 23 Aug 2005, at 01:33, Theo de Raadt wrote:
We are heading towards making the real 3.8 release soonish. I would
like to ask the community to do lots of testing over the next week if
they can.
For info, here is the latest 3.8 i386 snapshot booting on a 'common
corporate workhorse' HP DL3
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:13:38 -0500
"Jeffrey Roach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> test
Tested.
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
What's wrong with http://gaim.sf.net?
--
http://edd.link9.net - http://irc.is-cool.net
test
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Test
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 09:30 -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
>
> Yes, that's the hlt-hlt apm bug.
>
> -Bob
So it seems to me it's already committed to 3_7 stable branch, right ?
If so, how it could be related to this topic ? (APM calls during
interrupt ?)
Thanks Bob and sorry for the doubl
Yes, that's the hlt-hlt apm bug.
-Bob
* Massimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-05 09:00]:
> On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 18:37 -0400, Mike wrote:
>
>
> > I got a suggestion off-list to try a current release because this could
> > be related to the hlt hlt bug. I installed a snapshot
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 18:37 -0400, Mike wrote:
> I got a suggestion off-list to try a current release because this could
> be related to the hlt hlt bug. I installed a snapshot from 31 July but
> it didn't improve things. I changed my quick mode transforms from AES
> SHA to BLF MD5 and improved
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 15:29 +0200, Massimo wrote:
> I've made up a test LAN built on two mini-ITX Via C3 based board to test
> the AES encryption functionality of this CPU on a real setup.
>
> I've used flashboot 0.7.2 from Damien simply for a matter of time (I'v
I've made up a test LAN built on two mini-ITX Via C3 based board to test
the AES encryption functionality of this CPU on a real setup.
I've used flashboot 0.7.2 from Damien simply for a matter of time (I've
some flash card already configured) and since it seems to me a very go
I apologize for this automatic reply to your email.
To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I
have approved beforehand.
If you would like to be added to my list of approved senders, please
fill out the short request form (see link below). Once I approve you,
I will receiv
lingxiu is an archived account. This account has been inactive for
more than six months, and is no longer accepting e-mail. The account
is scheduled to be deleted. Please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
any e-mail distribution lists.
test mail
Adrian Chelar
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Kevin,
It showed up in my inbox.
HTH,
Michael
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kevin Elliott
Sent: Tue 5/31/2005 2:19 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Test
Uh this is just a test. I've sent a few messages to the list but
haven't seen them lo
Uh this is just a test. I've sent a few messages to the list but
haven't seen them loop back or gotten any replies. Maybe I am banned?
Can anyone read this?
301 - 361 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
