Mike Hernandez wrote:
On 10/21/05, Ramiro Aceves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi OpenBSD fans!
My 3.8 CD preorder is sent also!
I am waiting nervous for the 3.8 release!
Nervous? You must mean anxious :) One of the main reasons I love
OpenBSD is because there is so much less to be nervous
Hello all,
Thank you for hint, amd64 architecture does work on our HW !
Everything was instaled fine (I instaled latest snapshot). But we have
another problem.
When I look into BIOS, there is no possibility to do good irq routing.
BIOS groups almost all devices to irq3 :( I can change irq, but I
On 10/23/05, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, except that hard links are filesystem specific, you can't cross
filesystem boundaries with one.
Also, depending on design, you probably actually want a single RO
filesystem to serve as / for all diskless clients, and have smaller
How to use boot pxeboot is described in the doc I wrote two days ago,
you can find a link to it in the list. You'll find examples that I
hope will help.
gl
/bkw
On 10/23/05, poncenby smythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list, help for the following problem would be greatly
appreciated, it's so
On 10/23/05, Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And about keeping them synced, master.passwd is the most important
thing for keeping the 'accounts' intact.
You may want to look into the yp(8) subsystem. For the enviroment you
describe, this may be what you're looking for to keep many
Last spring I installed BSD onto a computer. Okay, so far. Now I have
installed BSD onto five computers. One of them is a OpenBSD 3.8 bridge on an
old i386.
The Packet Firewall rules all seemed logical, until I made the firewall; i.e,
bridge. Even though filtering is set to take place on
thanks for the replies, the solution I found was to insert the
following line into /etc/dhcpd.conf
next-server dhcpd server ip address
if this line isn't in then the obsd machine displayed 0.0.0.0 as the
server ip.
thanks for the replies
poncenby
On 23 Oct 2005, at 11:04, Bachman
--On 23 October 2005 11:29 +0200, LukC!E! Macura wrote:
When I look into BIOS, there is no possibility to do good irq routing.
BIOS groups almost all devices to irq3 :(
try a .mp kernel (even if you have 1 processor).
--On 23 October 2005 08:30 -0400, Darrel wrote:
My ruleset is basic, about like:
about like isn't nearly as good as directly including the whole file.
to be complete you might also include 'ifconfig', 'brconfig -a' and
'netstat -rn -finet' to give us a better idea of the network (if you
** Reply to message from Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 22
Oct 2005 23:44:13 +0200
Please STOP the discussion about document formats in this thread.
You're taking my time complaing on the document format (pdf).
I do _not_ want to discourage anyone from creating new, useful
documents,
Digging through the backlog, and found this unanswered...
Joe S wrote:
Since some quad nics share 1 interrupt, what kind of performance impact
would I be dealing with versus using 4 indiviual nics?
Debating wehter to use a Phobox P430TX quad dc nic or individual fxp0 nics.
Just test it and
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:13:07AM -0400, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
re
everybody who experienced problems w/ the mention chipsets
on the mobos such as audio not interrupting properly and stuff.
please try the changes i just put into sys/arch/i386/pci/.
(suppose bias according to your local
Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
Please STOP the discussion about document formats in this thread.
You're taking my time complaing on the document format (pdf).
In my first post I wrote that I want feedback on the document and nothing else.
I understand your frustation that your thread has been
Hi guys,
Just wanted to mention that during installation of last snapshot from
openbsd.informatik.uni-erlangen.de, when it's time to configure the
gigabit ethernet card with DHCP the following message appears:
re0: watchdog timeout
re0: watchdog timeout
re0: watchdog timeout
eventually it
On 10/23/05, Sigfred Heversen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
Please STOP the discussion about document formats in this thread.
You're taking my time complaing on the document format (pdf).
In my first post I wrote that I want feedback on the document and nothing
else.
Hi,
A little while back I got OpenOffice.org 2.0 to work on OpenBSD 3.8
snapshots. I didn't use the linux proc and I didn't install the RPM's.
I used rpm2cpio to convert the RPM's, then I used cpio to extract the
achives.
I enabled linux emulation and then just ran the soffice.bin file.
Greets:
I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once
I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break
it, test out recovery scenarios, etc. Which brings me to the question
at hand.
Following a hard failure the system must perfomr a parity check
Please guys, can we stop this fight over who does what and how to be
accessible from where.
In the interest of bringing peace back on misc@ I will extend the offer
to host this on high capacity network if the community really want it.
More then once the community always say, yes this is
On 10/23/05, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now my question is whether there is some way to shorten
this delay that I'm missing?
Did you read through the list archives? This matter is well-discussed.
Other OS'es, such as NetBSD, use a different way for the checking of
parity (i.e. in
generally with a filtering bridge, you would want to pass all traffic
on one of the interfaces ('set skip on XX' or a 'pass on XX' rule), and
just make rules apply to the other interface. Whether or not this is
what you're doing, isn't clear from your message.
Thanks. Determinable from this
--On 23 October 2005 16:52 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
generally with a filtering bridge, you would want to pass all
traffic on one of the interfaces ('set skip on XX' or a 'pass on
XX' rule), and just make rules apply to the other interface.
Whether or not this is what you're doing,
Hi all,
Until 4 days ago, I no longer receive email on my server. I thought it was my
provider (cox) since they
block inbound and outbound smtp.
When I send email from the outside, nothing shows up in my /var/mail/maillog, I
then get an email 3
days later connection timed out with my server.
On 10/23/05, Monah Baki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Until 4 days ago, I no longer receive email on my server. I thought it was
my provider (cox) since they block inbound and outbound smtp.
In the first case, you're out of luck unless you find an external
party that can relay your e-mail to you
On Sunday 23 October 2005 05:58 pm, Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 23 October 2005 16:52 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
generally with a filtering bridge, you would want to pass all
traffic on one of the interfaces ('set skip on XX' or a 'pass on
XX' rule), and just make rules apply to the
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 05:15:29PM -0600, Sibastien Taylor wrote:
I am having problems having two SATA disks recognized by OpenBSD, the
6300ESB
controller is found and seems to be configured properly but I get the
error:
pciide2: couldn't map channel 0 cmd regs
pciide2: couldn't map
Marco Peereboom wrote:
Folks who keep track of cvs changes might have noticed a barrage of commits
regarding ipmi(4). The driver is functionally complete but needs wide testing
on both amd64 and i386 architectures. Jordan Hargrave (jordan@) wrote most of
the code.
Let's talk a bit about
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:43:26 +0200
Rogier Krieger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/05, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now my question is whether there is some way to shorten
this delay that I'm missing?
Did you read through the list archives? This matter is well-discussed.
Other
Ken Gunderson wrote:
Greets:
I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once
I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break
it, test out recovery scenarios, etc.
smart. VERY smart. :)
Which brings me to the question
at hand.
Following a
per engelbrecht wrote:
This is really (really) great news.
Been blasting through a few servers but so fare, unfortunately, without
any ipmi? in any of the dmesg. Will try the bigger irons in a few hours.
Looking forward to using it though. Thank you guys.
I haven't had a chance to test it
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:42:35 -0400
Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken Gunderson wrote:
Greets:
I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once
I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break
it, test out recovery scenarios, etc.
30 matches
Mail list logo
