Re: Filter withdrawals

2016-09-13 Thread John Cox
On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:11:09 +0200, you wrote: >>> I’d be up for it. Although I’m still running 5.9 on my mail server, I’m >>> thinking of upgrading. I knew that filters are experimental (and really to >>> test the API, not the filters themselves), however I’ve decided to use some >>> of them

Re: Filter withdrawals

2016-09-12 Thread Mischa
>> I’d be up for it. Although I’m still running 5.9 on my mail server, I’m >> thinking of upgrading. I knew that filters are experimental (and really to >> test the API, not the filters themselves), however I’ve decided to use some >> of them and would like to continue doing so. The dnsbl is

Re: Filter withdrawals

2016-09-12 Thread John Cox
>> On 6 Sep 2016, at 14:10, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: >> >> I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter >> withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd >> and sieve. Is there any other options besides amavis? I

Re: Filter withdrawals

2016-09-11 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:15:45PM +, Michal Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > > On 6 Sep 2016, at 14:10, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > > > I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter > > withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back

Re: Filter withdrawals

2016-09-11 Thread Michal Krzysztofowicz
> On 6 Sep 2016, at 14:10, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter > withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd > and sieve. Is there any other options besides amavis? I

Filter withdrawals

2016-09-06 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd and sieve. Is there any other options besides amavis? I really miss filter-regex. Haven't had any luck finding a replacement just curious if