On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:11:09 +0200, you wrote:
>>> I’d be up for it. Although I’m still running 5.9 on my mail server, I’m
>>> thinking of upgrading. I knew that filters are experimental (and really to
>>> test the API, not the filters themselves), however I’ve decided to use some
>>> of them a
>
> Assuming that that is OpenBSD spamd then I may be able to help you
> with your dnsbl desire.
>
> I have a python script that runs every 15 mins (inside the spamd
> whitelist time) that checks for new entries, looks them up against a
> dnsbl and blacklists if appropriate. Note that this code
>> I’d be up for it. Although I’m still running 5.9 on my mail server, I’m
>> thinking of upgrading. I knew that filters are experimental (and really to
>> test the API, not the filters themselves), however I’ve decided to use some
>> of them and would like to continue doing so. The dnsbl is the
>> On 6 Sep 2016, at 14:10, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>>
>> I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter
>> withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd
>> and sieve. Is there any other options besides amavis? I really miss
>> filter-reg
>
> I'll stress it out one *last* time:
>
> - Running with filters will make your smtpd unstable and anyone taking a
> look at sources may figure ways to crash it. Many users who have hit a
> crash are now aware of how to crash other people's smtpd so every time
> you mention on the list that
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:15:45PM +, Michal Krzysztofowicz wrote:
>
> > On 6 Sep 2016, at 14:10, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> >
> > I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter
> > withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd
> > and
> On 6 Sep 2016, at 14:10, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>
> I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter
> withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd
> and sieve. Is there any other options besides amavis? I really miss
> filter-regex. H
You mean for people that don't read disclaimers, read me's, release notes? :)
Mischa
--
> On 11 Sep 2016, at 13:01, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:10:40AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>> I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter
>> with
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:10:40AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter
> withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd
> and sieve. Is there any other options besides amavis? I really miss
> filte
I would definitely join that group. :))
Mischa
> On 06 Sep 2016, at 16:10, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>
> I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter
> withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd
> and sieve. Is there any other options
I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter
withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd and
sieve. Is there any other options besides amavis? I really miss filter-regex.
Haven't had any luck finding a replacement just curious if anyon
11 matches
Mail list logo
