On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:11:09 +0200, you wrote:
>>> I’d be up for it. Although I’m still running 5.9 on my mail server, I’m
>>> thinking of upgrading. I knew that filters are experimental (and really to
>>> test the API, not the filters themselves), however I’ve decided to use some
>>> of them
>> I’d be up for it. Although I’m still running 5.9 on my mail server, I’m
>> thinking of upgrading. I knew that filters are experimental (and really to
>> test the API, not the filters themselves), however I’ve decided to use some
>> of them and would like to continue doing so. The dnsbl is
>> On 6 Sep 2016, at 14:10, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>>
>> I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter
>> withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd
>> and sieve. Is there any other options besides amavis? I
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:15:45PM +, Michal Krzysztofowicz wrote:
>
> > On 6 Sep 2016, at 14:10, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> >
> > I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter
> > withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back
> On 6 Sep 2016, at 14:10, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>
> I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter
> withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd
> and sieve. Is there any other options besides amavis? I
I'm thinking of starting a support group for others suffering from filter
withdrawal. Upgraded to 6.0 over the weekend and went back to using spampd and
sieve. Is there any other options besides amavis? I really miss filter-regex.
Haven't had any luck finding a replacement just curious if