[MoLiCo] Fw: Failure Notice-A video I found on the internet but which disappeared before I could send it.

Here is is once more. - Forwarded Message - From: mailer-dae...@yahoo.com mailer-dae...@yahoo.com To: linda.h...@sbcglobal.net Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2012 11:07 AM Subject: Failure Notice I sent this and it came back as a failure notice which with my hacker happens often so I am

Fw: [MoLiCo] Fw: Failure Notice-A video I found on the internet but which disappeared before I could send it.

To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2012 11:37 AM Subject: [MoLiCo] Fw: Failure Notice-A video I found on the internet but which disappeared before I could send it. Here is is once more. - Forwarded Message - From

LOOK at what I found

*The Power and Limitations of a City Binding Future Councils.* A basic rule of municipal law is one *city*council cannot forever tie the hands of *future* *city* council with respect to legislative enactments; no ordinance passed by one *city* council may remain beyond the repeal or amendment of

Re: LOOK at what I found

@googlegroups.com Subject: LOOK at what I found *The Power and Limitations of a City Binding Future Councils.* A basic rule of municipal law is one *city*council cannot forever tie the hands of *future* *city* council with respect to legislative enactments; no ordinance passed by one *city

Re: LOOK at what I found

*To*: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com *Subject*: LOOK at what I found *The Power and Limitations of a City Binding Future Councils.* A basic rule of municipal law is one *city*council cannot forever tie the hands of *future* *city* council with respect to legislative enactments; no ordinance passed by one

RE: LOOK at what I found

at what I found To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com Date: Friday, November 14, 2008, 9:09 PM How does it line up with Missouri Statutes??? -Original Message- From: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom Martz Sent: Friday

Re: LOOK at what I found

Actually Jim I disagree, what I have posted came from CA law however it is the ONLY place I can find ANY definition for binding future city councils. In regards to the wording of what I found I believe I'm correct in my understanding that Greg Burris and our current city council can pass

Re: LOOK at what I found

bluffing. Jim --- On Fri, 11/14/08, Tom Martz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Tom Martz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LOOK at what I found To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com Date: Friday, November 14, 2008, 9:39 PM Actually Jim I disagree, what I have posted came from CA law

Re: I FOUND IT !!!!

, 2008 11:13:02 AM Subject: I FOUND IT Thanks to Mark Wright for pointing me in the right direction. With the assessment of restaurant health inspection fees being my pet peeve since it was asked for I have been doing mountains of research to prove these fees cannot be voted

I FOUND IT !!!!

Thanks to Mark Wright for pointing me in the right direction. With the assessment of restaurant health inspection fees being my pet peeve since it was asked for I have been doing mountains of research to prove these fees cannot be voted on. This portion came from page 4 of the Hancock Amendment.