Re: [Mixxx-devel] djworx tl;dr: Mixxx needs effects

2013-05-14 Thread Barney Holmes
Seems to have been written by someone who is not fully familiar with F/OSS (BTW I highly recommend this - http://codingfreedom.com/buy_download.html ) but at least they say ... "this isn’t your average software. As open source, users are actively encouraged to get involved to make Mixxx better with

Re: [Mixxx-devel] djworx tl;dr: Mixxx needs effects

2013-05-14 Thread RJ Ryan
Hi everyone -- this seems like a great time to give an update on the effects framework. :) About two years ago I started work on an effects framework. The design document is here: http://mixxx.org/wiki/doku.php/effects_framework The design abstracts over plugin backends so Mixxx doesn't care if y

Re: [Mixxx-devel] djworx tl;dr: Mixxx needs effects

2013-05-14 Thread Owen Williams
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 10:37 -0400, RJ Ryan wrote: > > Hope everyone is on the same page now with where effects stands. If > you want to be involved please add comments to the design doc. Also, > the effects branch has had a working skin and 2 simple flanger effect > chains (just to prove you can

Re: [Mixxx-devel] djworx tl;dr: Mixxx needs effects

2013-05-14 Thread RJ Ryan
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Barney Holmes wrote: > The criticism about the FX engine is a valid one. I'm currently putting > together a Blueprint about the way this could be tackled in the context of > F/OSS and the current state of Linux audio software. I currently have two > instances (4 d

Re: [Mixxx-devel] djworx tl;dr: Mixxx needs effects

2013-05-14 Thread RJ Ryan
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Owen Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 10:37 -0400, RJ Ryan wrote: > > > > > Hope everyone is on the same page now with where effects stands. If > > you want to be involved please add comments to the design doc. Also, > > the effects branch has had a workin

Re: [Mixxx-devel] djworx tl;dr: Mixxx needs effects

2013-05-14 Thread Ewan Colsell
i'm super happy with 1.11 a load of stuff has really come together nicely in this release. well done everybody! the only thing i'm missing is a really fast and simple waveform that performs well enough to let me use timecodes on a netbook. effects is defiantly worth doing right, and taking more

[Mixxx-devel] fast and simple waveform

2013-05-14 Thread Daniel Schürmann
Hi Ewan, thank you for your valuable comments, Can you please describe your waveform issues in a new launchpad bug. Please include a description of your setup including Hardware Os and display driver. What is the desired latency? And what is achievable with and without waveforms? I am currently