Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine

2013-05-22 Thread Philip Whelan
Unfortunately, it looks like we will never switch to qmake, especially since the build servers are setup to use it. Qtcreator has some support for SCons already, http://scons.org/wiki/IDEIntegration#Qt_Creator, so there seems to be little benefit to the switch. Of course you can always use it if y

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine

2013-05-22 Thread Steven Boswell II
I finally built Fedora RPMs for all of Mixxx's dependencies, got them to pass rpmlint/mock/fedora-review, and even submitted a few package-requests, so they might actually end up in Fedora's repos.  Until then, here's a github repo containing all the files you'll need to turn Fedora Core's stan

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine

2013-05-21 Thread Steven Boswell II
If you do that, I'll be glad to put my cmake knowledge to good use by reviewing your work. From: Tuukka Pasanen To: mixxx-devel Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:49 PM Subject: Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine Hello,

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine

2013-05-21 Thread Tuukka Pasanen
*Cc:* mixxx-devel mailto:mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> *Sent:* Monday, May 20, 2013 11:23 AM *Subject:* Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine Hi Tuukka, my vote is for cmake, The KDE guys have made good experience

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine

2013-05-21 Thread RJ Ryan
- >> *From:* Daniel Schürmann >> *To:* Tuukka Pasanen >> *Cc:* mixxx-devel >> *Sent:* Monday, May 20, 2013 11:23 AM >> >> *Subject:* Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine >> >> Hi Tuukka, >> >> my vote is for c

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine

2013-05-20 Thread Tuukka Pasanen
gh benefits. > Also...real life is threatening to intrude any day now :-) > > Steven Boswell > > -- > *From:* Daniel Schürmann > *To:* Tuukka Pasanen > *Cc:* mixxx-devel > *Sent:* Monday, May 20, 2013 11:23 AM > > *Subject:* Re: [Mixxx

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine

2013-05-20 Thread Steven Boswell II
To: Tuukka Pasanen Cc: mixxx-devel Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 11:23 AM Subject: Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine Hi Tuukka, my vote is for cmake, The KDE guys have made good experience with it. But I think this is a lot of work to migrate to cmake. I would be happy

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine

2013-05-20 Thread Daniel Schürmann
Hi Tuukka, my vote is for cmake, The KDE guys have made good experience with it. But I think this is a lot of work to migrate to cmake. I would be happy if someone picks up that task. Scons is so slow. Kind regards, Daniel 2013/5/20 Tuukka Pasanen > Hello, > openSUSE also have good mingw su

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine

2013-05-20 Thread Steven Boswell II
control and hid in the MinGW build! Steven Boswell From: Tuukka Pasanen To: mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 4:27 AM Subject: Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine Hello, openSUSE also have good mingw s

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine

2013-05-20 Thread Tuukka Pasanen
Hello, openSUSE also have good mingw support and rpms. I see if I have time to play with this. Is it possible to get rid of scons and get this qmake for 1.12? It would be nice just to have pure QT building system. Thanks, Tuukka On 18.05.2013 23:08, Steven Boswell II wrote: After building an