Re: Fw: [Mjpeg-users] Mjpegtools 1.6.2 release candidate 1 (1.6.1.90)

2003-08-25 Thread Ray Cole
I downloaded the source and built it. It seems to run about 4x slower than 1.6.1. Any ideas? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux

[Mjpeg-users] Re: Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown? (Steven M. Schultz)

2003-08-25 Thread William R Sherman
The yellow/white/red video/audio inputs, whichever those are called. I can never keep the names straight... :-} Those would be the 'composite' (redwhite usually), the yellow is usually the audio. Hmmm, I'd say that redwhite are component audio, and yellow is composite video.

Re: Fw: [Mjpeg-users] Mjpegtools 1.6.2 release candidate 1(1.6.1.90)

2003-08-25 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hey Ray, On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 16:22, Ray Cole wrote: I downloaded the source and built it. It seems to run about 4x slower than 1.6.1. Any ideas? What runs 4 times slower? Recording? MPEG encoding? Transcoding? Compiling? Ronald -- Ronald Bultje [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fw: [Mjpeg-users] Mjpegtools 1.6.2 release candidate 1 (1.6.1.90)

2003-08-25 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Ray Cole wrote: I downloaded the source and built it. It seems to run about 4x slower than 1.6.1. Any ideas? Get a new watch? ;-)With out some numbers I find it very difficult to believe 4x slower. For full sized DVD frames around 5 to 6

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: Mjpegtools 1.6.2 release candidate 1 (1.6.1.90)(Ronald Bultje)

2003-08-25 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, William R Sherman wrote: Well then three cheers to Steven: Hip hip hooray You can say that after the gaffe I made with the Red/White/Yellow connectors? ;) Gee thanks! One question though, the past couple days people have mentioned that

[Mjpeg-users] Mjpegtools 1.6.2 rc1 (Upgrading!)

2003-08-25 Thread Martin Samuelsson
I'm lazy. At last, I've downloaded 1.6.2rc1 and upgraded my old 1.6.0 installation. Good for me. I thought I'd share parts of the experience while I still remember it. Installing: As I said before, I'm lazy. That's why I downloaded the source rpm and began rebuilding it for a clean install

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Mjpegtools 1.6.2 rc1 (Upgrading!)

2003-08-25 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hey Martin, On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 19:55, Martin Samuelsson wrote: I'm lazy. So am I, welcome to the club. :). As I said before, I'm lazy. That's why I downloaded the source rpm and began rebuilding it for a clean install within the rpm framework. I abandoned that course when I was asked

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Mjpegtools 1.6.2 rc1 (Upgrading!)

2003-08-25 Thread Martin Samuelsson
On Monday 25 August 2003 21:01, Ronald Bultje wrote: If I'm correct, using a --nodeps should work. We don't specifically need it. I just added it so that normal people will understand that they can get quicktime support by this. It probably would work just fine, but I'm not only lazy; I'm a