Re: [Mjpeg-users] Pro quality dvd streams for animation

2005-05-19 Thread Matt
Hello! > > Fair enough. They have some mighty nice tools. We do most of our work in > > blender > > I've seen the Blender book on the shelf at Borders - maybe I'll pick it > up and give it a try. For nothing, it is awesome software. Can't be beaten. And if you don't mind getting a l

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Gain on DV

2005-05-19 Thread Dik Takken
On Thu, 19 May 2005, E.Chalaron wrote: Worth a look ? http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=93571 Wow, that looks good. Might be very useful for improving DV camcorder recordings. The screencaps on this site show the typical consumer camcorder problems due to sub-optimal lighting cond

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Pro quality dvd streams for animation

2005-05-19 Thread Dave Dodge
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:41:14AM +, Matt wrote: > > I've seen the Blender book on the shelf at Borders - maybe I'll > > pick it up and give it a try. > > For nothing, it is awesome software. Can't be beaten. Agreed, it's by far the most functional free tool out there. > And if you don't min

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Pro quality dvd streams for animation

2005-05-19 Thread Matt
Howdy! > > Agreed, it's by far the most functional free tool out there. Absolutely. In this genre, it is clearly king of the heap. > If you're coming in with no preconceived notions of how these tools > are supposed to work, it may be a lot easier to get comfortable. Fair enough. I would say tha

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Gain on DV

2005-05-19 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Dik Takken wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2005, E.Chalaron wrote: > > > http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=93571 > > Wow, that looks good. Might be very useful for improving DV camcorder > recordings. The screencaps on this site show the typical consumer > camcord

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Pro quality dvd streams for animation

2005-05-19 Thread Steven M. Schultz
Hi - On Thu, 19 May 2005, Matt wrote: > Additionally, you really don't need the book. > I happen to own a couple, and the 'net is nearly as good. > I buy them to support the folks that work at it! That's the reason I've bought other books in the past - to send some money to the

[Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace rejects 4:2:0 streams

2005-05-19 Thread Dik Takken
Hi, I'm having a bit of trouble using yuvdeinterlace. It happens from time to time that it refuses to process 4:2:0 streams. Even when I use ... | y4mscaler -O chromass=420_MPEG2 -S option=sinc:4 | ... to explicitely convert the stream from 4:1:1 (DV) to 4:2:0 (DVD) and eventually feed the resul

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace rejects 4:2:0 streams

2005-05-19 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Dik Takken wrote: > I'm having a bit of trouble using yuvdeinterlace. It happens from time to > time that it refuses to process 4:2:0 streams. Even when I use > INFO: [yuvdeinterlace] Y4M-Stream is 720x576(4:2:0 MPEG2) > **ERROR: [yuvdeinterlace] Y4M-Stream is not 4:2:0

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Gain on DV

2005-05-19 Thread E.Chalaron
> First - the work is being done in RGB so there's the (lossy) conversion > from Y'CbCr to RGB. Then the data has to be converted back and while > that's not lossy there is the problem of accumulated (roundoff) error > creeping in. I think the guy wants to write a YUV ver