On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Gregoire Favre wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:49:12PM +0100, Andrew Stevens wrote:
>
> > Sounds like your using an older version. There was a bug where the size for
> > -f 8 was effectively hard-wired to 2GB.
> >
> > This is certainly fixed in the development version
On Sunday 05 Jan 2003 2:25 pm, you wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:49:12PM +0100, Andrew Stevens wrote:
> > Sounds like your using an older version. There was a bug where the size
> > for -f 8 was effectively hard-wired to 2GB.
> >
> > This is certainly fixed in the development version and I t
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 06:09:33PM +0100, Bernhard Praschinger wrote:
> The CVS Version I use is a bit newer.
Then I should take the CVS also ;-)
And voila, that's it!!!
> If you want more chapters, you should create more editlistfiles. And
> encode more steams instead of that spliting. Splitin
Hallo
> > With that information I cannot exactly tell. I know that it works on my
> > machine with 100MB (I have no stream with more than 400 MB lying
> > around).
> > The only differnce I see with the information you reveal is that you do
> > not specifie each stream. That might be a differnece.
>
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:13:13PM +0100, Bernhard Praschinger wrote:
> With that information I cannot exactly tell. I know that it works on my
> machine with 100MB (I have no stream with more than 400 MB lying
> around).
> The only differnce I see with the information you reveal is that you do
>
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:49:12PM +0100, Andrew Stevens wrote:
> Sounds like your using an older version. There was a bug where the size for
> -f 8 was effectively hard-wired to 2GB.
>
> This is certainly fixed in the development version and I think I also merged
> in the (1 line) fix into
On Saturday 04 Jan 2003 9:01 pm, Gregoire Favre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use this:
>
> mplex -f 8 -S 400 -o name%d.mpg "001.mp*"
>
> to mux files together, but I alwasy get 2 Gb files :-(
>
> Any idea on how to use this option?
>
> Thank you very much and please CC to me as I am not on this ml!!!
>
>
Hallo
> > > mplex -f 8 -S 400 -o name%d.mpg "001.mp*"
> > > to mux files together, but I alwasy get 2 Gb files :-(
> > That is a correct behavior of mplex.
> >
> > > Any idea on how to use this option?
> > man mplex
> Well, do you really think I haddn't?
I have had in serveral years enought questi
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 07:32:40AM +0100, Bernhard Praschinger wrote:
Good morming ;-)
> > mplex -f 8 -S 400 -o name%d.mpg "001.mp*"
> > to mux files together, but I alwasy get 2 Gb files :-(
> That is a correct behavior of mplex.
>
> > Any idea on how to use this option?
> man mplex
Well, do
Hallo
> I use this:
>
> mplex -f 8 -S 400 -o name%d.mpg "001.mp*"
> to mux files together, but I alwasy get 2 Gb files :-(
That is a correct behavior of mplex.
> Any idea on how to use this option?
man mplex
auf hoffentlich bald,
Berni the Chaos of Woodquarter
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAI
Hello,
I use this:
mplex -f 8 -S 400 -o name%d.mpg "001.mp*"
to mux files together, but I alwasy get 2 Gb files :-(
Any idea on how to use this option?
Thank you very much and please CC to me as I am not on this ml!!!
Grégoire
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
